[00:00:02]
THERE'S SIX OF US HERE. SHALL WE BEGIN?
[Call to Order]
ALL RIGHT. THIS IS MEETING OF THE ANASTASIA DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. WITH IS ON-LINE.>> IS DIANE LEONARDO. THE JUNE 11TH, 2020 AND 2:00 P.M. BEING HELD IN COUNTY AUDITORIUM.
IN ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA. I WOULD LIKE TO CALL THIS MEETING TO ORDER. THE PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENTS
[Reading of the Public Notices statement.]
THIS THE PUBLIC HEARING WITH REQUIREMENT OF PUBLIC LAW.PUBLIC WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT IN THE JURISDICTION AT DESIGNATED TIME DURING THE HEARING.
MY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC WISHING TO SPEAK MUST INDICATE SO BY FILLING OUT SPEAKER CARD. ANY ADDITIONAL SPEAKER MAY BE HEARD AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIR.
PUBLIC SHALL SPEAK AT TIME DURING THE MEETING ON EACH ITEM FOR THREE MINUTES AS DESIGNATED BYTY CHAIR.
SPEAKER SHOULD IDENTIFY THEMSELVES WHO THEY REPRESENT AND STATE ADDRESSES FOR THE RECORD.
SPEAKER MAY OFFER SWORN TESTIMONY.
THE PERSON DESIGNS TO APPEAL A DECISION MADE RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERING THE HEARING SUCH PERSON WILL MEET A RECORD OF PROCEEDING AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THE VERBATIM RECORD IS HEARD. WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY ANDERS BY THE APPEAL TO BASED.
ANY EVIDENCE PRESENTED DURING THE HEARING SUCHERS DRAWING OR PHOTOGRAPHS IS PART OF THE RECORD.
RECORD WILL THEN BE AVAILABLE FOR OTHER BOARDS, ET CETERA FOR THE COUNTY AND REVIEW. BOARD MEMBER ARE REMINDED ALTERNATE THE BEGINNING OF EACH ITEM THEY STATE WHETHER THERE WAS APPLICANT. SUCH COMMUNICATION HAS BOARD MEMBER SHOULD THEN IDENTIFY THE PERSON INVOLVED IN THE MATERIAL CONTENT COMMUNICATION. CIVILITY CLAUSE.
WE WILL BE RESPECTFUL OF ONE ANOTHER EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE.
WE WILL DIRECT ALL COMMENTS TO THE ISSUED.
WE WILL AVOID PERSONAL ATTACKS. >>> ARE THERE ANY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC WHO ARE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH ONE OF THE APPLICANTS.
WE HAVE FOUR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA TODAY.
[Item 1]
WE WILL COMMENCE WITH I'M MADRB2020-01 ISLAND PREP ACADEMY PAINT COLORS. BUILDING EX-STEERER AT 4035A1ASOUTH. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE FOR THE I-LOS ANGELES PREP ACADEMY PAINT IS REQUEST LOCATED AT 4035A1A SOUTH AND REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF THE BUILDING PAINT FINISHES TO MATCH THE EXISTING FACILITY LOCATED TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH.
>> THIS IS THE EXISTING FACILIT PROVIDED SHOWING THE PAINT SCHEME. THE APPLICANT DID PROVIDE THE PAINT COLORS. UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS CUSTOM PAINT CODE. GIVEN A NAME OR ANYTHING WAS DIFFICULT. THIS WAS THE BEST WE HAVE FOR
THE PAINT COLORS. >> NOTING THAT THIS IS GOING TO PAINT THE BRICK AT BEACHSIDE FRONT AGE HERE.
CERTAINLY THAT WOULD APPEAR TO BE IMPROVEMENT.
THE ONLY QUESTION RAISES IS ISLAND PREP'S COLOR AMONG THE
APPROVED COLORS FOR THIS BOARD? >> THERE IS A SECONDARY LOCATION ALSO ON THE ISLAND. IT'S NOT THIS ONE.
I HAVE IT IN MY STAFF REPORT PICTURE.
IT WAS APPROVED AT SOME POINT. I WAS UNABLE TO FIND THE SPECIFIC PAINT COLOR. IT WAS SO APPROVED SEVERAL YEARS AGO. I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT DATE FOR
IT. >> WELL AS MUCH -- AS MUCH AS THIS IS CUSTOM COLOR IF WE APPROVE IT.
I THINK THEY SHOULD PROVIDE US WITH SPECIFICS REGARDING DESIGNATION OF THIS COLOR. SO THAT AT -- YES? [INAUDIBLE] HELLO MICHAEL ISLAND PREP.
[00:05:12]
THE COLOR THAT I SENT I HIT UP OUR TAYLOR PAINT WHO DID ALL OUR PAINTING. AND I ASKED HIM WHAT THE COLORS WERE. THOSE WERE THE -- THAT'S WHAT HE SENT ME. AND THAT IS SHERWIN WILLIAMS BRAND. WE USE SHERWIN WILLIAMS TO ESTABLISH OUR LIST OF APPROVED COLORS.AND I'M NOT SAYING WE DISAPROVE. WHAT I'M SAYING GOING FORWARD, WHAT I THINK WOULD BE MOTION APPROPRIATE IS TO HAVE A DESIGNATION OF THIS COLOR'S NAME.
>> OKAY. >> SO THAT IF WE APPROVE IT.
WE CAN THEN AS NECESSARY ADD IT TO OUR LIST OF APPROVED COLORS.
>> WHAT WE DID WHEN WE -- THE PROPERTY AT 4171ASA SOUTH, THAT'S OUR FIRST LOCATION. WE WENT THROUGH AN ARB MEETING AS WELL TO GET OUR SIGN APPROVED AND THE PAINT COLORS APPROVED.
AND WE JUST KEPT THE PAINT COLORS THAT WERE ON THE BUILDING. WE THOUGHT THAT WAS FINE.
THE ONLY THING WE WERE CHANGING WAS THE COLOR OF OUR SIGN.
WHEN THEY SAID THOSE COLORS WERE APPROVED.
WE JUST COLOR MATCHED THOSE COLOR.
THAT'S WHY I DON'T HAVE A NAME. WE COLOR MATCHED THE COLOR AND USED THEM IN THIS LOCATION FOR CONTINUITY AND USE THAT'S WHY WE PLAN ON USING IN THE NEW BUILDING.
>> ALL RIGHT. FOR THE TIME BEING WE'LL JUST
CALL IT I-BRAND PREP FINISH. >> I THINK THE OTHER COLOR IS THE SANDY COLOR ON THE VERY BOTTOM.
THERE'S LIKE A BOTTOM BAND FOUR FOOT UP.
>> MY OTHER QUESTION IS YOU TALKED ABOUT PAINT COLOR BEACH
SIDE HAD A BRIGHT BLUE ROOF. >> YEAH.
>> WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THAT. >> ARE YOU PLANNING ON DOING.
>> WILL CHANGE THE ENTIRE FACED. I DID SPEAK WITH EVETTE, I BELIEVE. AND THEN I SENT OVER THE MARKUPS WHAT WE WILL DO TO THE BUILDING. WE WILL TAKE THE BRICK FACED AND THE STOREFRONT WINDOW OFF THE STOREFRONT WINDOWS ARE OVER 35 YEARS OLD AND THEY ARE FAILING. WE ARE GOING TO BASICALLY MIMIC THIS EXACT DESIGN THAT WE HAVE ON THIS BUILDING WITH THE STUCCO TO MATCH THAT BUILDING. AND WE'LL DO THE SAME SAME CORRUGATED ROOF MATERIAL IN THE GALVANIZED TO MATCH AS WELL.
>> BASICALLY LOOKS LIKE AN EXTENSION OF THIS BUILDING.
NOT A SERIOUS PROBLEM EXCEPT THIS NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS APPLICATION OR NEW APPLICATION.
>> WE DID SUBMIT ALLS THE PLANS TO THE COMMITTEE FOR THAT
BUILDING. >> UNFORTUNATELY THE TIMING OF IT IS SUCH THAT FOR ONE WE WERE ADVERTISED JUST FOR PAINT ONLY.
AND THEN IT HASN'T BEEN REVIEWED OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
YOU CAN COME BACK WITH SECONDARY ONE.
>> I DON'T THINK HE NEEDS TO HAVE FEW FILING APPLICATION FEE.
>> DECISION OF THE CHAIR. WE CAN ADD APPROVAL TO THE
LANGUAGE. >> HE DOESN'T NEED A NEW FEE.
WE NEED TO ADD IT. WE WILL HAVE TO APPROVE IT AT THE NEXT MEETING. SORRY.
BUT IT HAS TO BE NOTICED. BUT LET'S PROCEED AND GET
EVERYTHING IN SHIPSHAPE. >> SIR IF YOU COULD REPEAT YOUR
NAME AND ADDRESS. >> MICHAEL GIVISDA.
MY ADDRESS IS 311 WEST ROAD ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA.
32080. >>> DIANE, WE'RE SHARING HEADLINES HERE. DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE WITH REGARD TO THIS?
>> HEAD NODDING HERE AS WELL. >> THE ONLY THINK I WOULD WONDER IF SHERWIN WILLIAMS CAN TELL US WHAT THE COLOR IS.
>> YES. WE ALL THIS THAT'S IMPORTANT.
IF THE STAFF WOULD MAKE AN EFFORT TO FIND OUT WHAT SHERWIN
WILLIAMS. >> I WILL DRIVE BE THERE ON THE WAY HOME AND SEE WHAT THEY CAN TELL ME.
>> THEY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO GIVE YOU COLOR.
BECAUSE IT'S A CUSTOM COLOR. >> TAKEN OFF --
>> WE ALSO HAVE THE COLOR SWATCHES.
IT SHOULD BE CLOSE WITHIN THOSE FANS OR SWATCHES.
I BELIEVE IT BREWSTERS ICE CREAM.
YOU HAVE SAME COLOR ACROSS THE STREET.
>> THIS IS JUST CON SIS CONSIST WITH ALL THE BUILDING IN TOWN.
[00:10:06]
>> JUST IN THE ISLAND ON THAT RUN.
THAT'S THE WAY WE LOOKED AT IT. WE'RE FINE THE COLORS.
THEY WERE APPROVED. WE DIDN'T SEEK TO CHANGE THEM.
WE JUST REPAINTED THE SAME COLOR.
>> THE BRICK IS COMING OFF. THE WINDOW ARE COMING OUT.
YOU WILL PUT PITCH ROOF IF >> NO PITCHED ROOF.
IT WILL HAVE SAME CORRUGATED LOOK AS THAT RICH THERE INSTEAD
OF TEAL BLUE. >> WHERE THE BLUE IS IT WILL BE
>> THAT'S GOING TO BE INTERESTING LOOK.
WHAT COLOR GOING TO BE? >> GALVANIZED STEAL.
IT WILL LOOK SIMILAR TO THE BUILDING THAT ARE COMING UP DOWN ACROSS THE STREET FROM THE WENDY'S ON THAT CORRIDOR.
>> I THINK PROBABLY IF WE GET OUR COLORS FOR HIM.
SO HE WOULD HAVE A CLUE AS TO WHAT MAYBE CLOSE TO THEM.
THEN HE CAN SAY OKAY. SHERWIN WILLIAMS THIS BASICALLY IN THIS SAME COLOR FORM. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE?
>> ISLAND PREP BEIGE WILL BE DESIGNATED AS BEING IN THE FAMILY OF SHERWIN WILLIAMS COLOR.
>> WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT APPROVE THE COLOR.
>> I MAKE A MOTION APPROVE THE ISLAND PREP CUSTOM COLOR.
>> THAT'S ALL WE NEED TO SAY. >> ALL IN FAVOR.
>> DO WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND SCHEDULE FOR THE REVIEW FOR THE -- [INAUDIBLE]
>> THANK YOU. >> ALL MY HOA MEETINGS HAVE TO TAKE PLACE VIA TELEPHONE. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2 IS -- >> I GOT IT.
>> YOU READY. >> LET'S MOVE ON TO AGENDA ITEM
[Item 2]
NUMBER 2. ITEM MADRB 2020-03-13904/CIRCLE K, WHICH I ASSUME IS DESIGNATION AND TO REPLACE EXISTING PILON SIGN PANELS AND TWO NEW LED LIGHT BOXES ON THE EXISTING CANOPY AT 4301 ASA SOUTH. I WANT TO SAY I DRIVEN BY ALL THE LOCATIONS THAT ARE ON THE AGENDA TODAY.HAVE NOT PHYSICALLY STOPPED AT ANY.
BUT HAVE SEEN THEM FROM THE ROAD.
>> I ACTUALLY PULLED INTO THE DRIVEWAYS.
>> I'VE BEEN TO THEM AS WELL. >> OKAY.
THE CIRCUMSTANCE WE HAVE HERE NO ONE IS HERE FROM CIRCLE K OR THE SIGN COMPANY WHICH ILLUUMINU PLUS.
THEY WANT TO REPLACE IT WITH PYLON INSERTS.
THIS DOES NOT DESIGNATE THAT I SAW IF ANY OF THESE ARE DIGITAL, FLASHING, CHANGING -- IF THIS JUST GOING TO BE OTHER THAN CHANGING THE PRICE OF UNLEADED GAS, IF THIS WILL BE LIT BY THE -- HOW DO THEY DESCRIBE IT? LED LIGHT BOXES, WHICH I ASSUME
[00:15:06]
ARE INTERIOR. IS THAT CORRECT?>> YES, SIR. THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING.
>> NO MOVING SIGNS. NO MOVING PARTS.
JUST THIS DISPLAY AND THE ONLY POSSIBLE DIGITAL COMPONENT IS
THE PRICE OF THE GAS. >> YES, SIR.
I DON'T BELIEVE I SAW ANYWHERE IN THERE PACKAGE THAT WOULD BE
DIGITAL. >> THERE BE NO ONE HERE FOR THE APPLICANT. DOES ANYONE ON THE BOARD HAVE
COMMENTS REGARDING THIS? >> I HAVE CURIOSITY QUESTION.
WHY WOULD THEY SPEND THAT MUCH MONEY [INAUDIBLE] THAT WAS MY QUESTION.
I'M GLAD YOU PULLED THAT UP. WELL, THAT KIND OF BUSINESS
DECISION IS NOT SOMETHING -- >> THAT'S THE REASON WHY I WONDER IF IT'S SOMETHING THAT COULD BE CHANGED?
>> THAT WOULD MAKE SENSE. >> I BELIEVE THAT YOU MAY MAKE A MOTION TO INCLUDE THAT PARTICULAR PORTION OF THE SIGN COULD BE CHANGED. IF YOU WERE TO APPROVE IT.
>> NOT UNTIL WE KNOW WHAT THEY CHANGE IT TO.
>> THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK, AGAIN.
THEY GET STUCK AGAIN. >> IF THAT'S THEIR CHOICE AND NO ONE HERE TO DISPUTE IT. I SEE NO REASON TO DISAPPROVE THIS. I WOULD MOVE THAT WE APPROVE
[Item 3]
NOW WE MOVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3.WHICH IS MADRB2020-04 WINN-DIXIE SIGNS TO REPLACE TWO WALL SIGNS AND PAINT WHITE ON THE AREAS OF THE BUILDING AT 3905A1A SOUTH.
BEFORE WE GO FURTHER I KNOW WE HAVE AT LEAST A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SIGN COMPANY HERE. AND I WOULD LIKE FOR THE STAFF TO PUT ON THE RECORD THEIR REASONING BEHIND THE RECOMMENDATION THAT WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.
AND I WILL MAKE COMMENTS THEREAFTER.
>> YES, SIR. >> SPECIFICALLY IN REGARDS TO THE SIGNS EXCEEDING THE SIZE ALLOWANCE.
THERE'S LANGUAGE IN THE OVERLAY THAT IS FOR EXEMPTIONS.
I WILL READ OFF THAT PARAGRAPH AND THE SPECIFIC EXEMPTION.
FOLLOWING ACTIVITY SHOULD EXEMPT FROM REVIEW AS REQUIRED IN THE PARK. IN THE EVENT OF THE EXEMPT ACTIVITY. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CAN DECIDE IF IT'S IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARK.
EXEMPTION 6. NONSUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WHICH DO NOT CHANGE THE CHARACTER DESIGN OR COMMONLY OBSERVED APPEARANCE OF THE SITE OR STRUCTURE. THAT WOULD BE THE PORTION THAT I REFERENCED FOR THE REPLACEMENT SIGN AS IT IS REPLACING CURRENTLY AN OVERSIZED SIGN. I FEEL THAT EXEMPTION IS
APPROPRIATE. >> BEFORE WE GO FORWARD.
WOULD THE REPRESENTATIVE SIGN COMPANY LIKE TO MAKE A
>> LOOKING WHAT'S BEEN PROPOSED. I MAKE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS.
FIRST OF ALL, THE WHITE BACKGROUND WITH THE RED LETTERING IS IN FACT, THE CHANGE IN THE COLOR WHICH COULD BE DISTINGUISHED AND THEN COULD BE CALLED A DESIGN CHANGE.
SECONDLY, THE SIGN FOR THE LIQUOR STORE, WHICH IS NOT VERY CLEARLY SHOWN BUT I KNOW IT'S THERE IS GOING TO BE AS FAR AS I
CAN SEE PRETTY MUCH NEW SIGNAGE. >>
>> AS THE CONSEQUENCE IT SAY RIGHT NOW SAYS LIQUOR.
I WILL SAY WINN-DIXIE BEER, WINE AND SPIRITS.
SO I AM NOT AT ALL SURE THAT THIS FITS WITHIN THAT EXEMPTION AND I THINK WHAT WE MAY BE LOOKING FOR HERE IS MORE APPROPRIATE A NONZONING VARIANCE REQUEST.
HAVE THEY MADE SUCH A REQUEST? >> APPLICANT HAS MADE SUCH A REQUEST AT THE DECISION OF STAFF BUT DIDN'T COME BEFORE THE
[00:20:02]
NUMBERS. >> IT WOULD BE UNDER THE IMPRESSION SUNS THIS APPLICATION WAS PROPERLY NOTICED AND INCLUDED OVERSIDE SIGNAGE AS PART OF THE PACKAGE THAT IF THE BOARD WAS OF THE LIKINGS, WE WOULD INCLUDE A NONZONING VARIANCE APPROVAL FOR IT. BUT I WILL LEAVE THAT DISCRETION
TO THE CHAIR. >> CAN WE DEAL WITH NONVARIANCE APPROVAL WITHOUT THE FACT THAT IT IS VARIANCE REAL.
>> WITHOUT LEGAL REPRESENTATION I WOULD SAY THAT I HAVE SEEN IN THE PAST WHERE ITEMS ARE CONSIDERED THAT WERE NOT THE ORIGINAL ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE.
BUT WERE OTHERWISE EXTREMELY RELATED TO THEM.
AND THE END RESULTS ALLOWED TO GO FORWARD.
NONVARIANCE? >> THEY DID BUT NOT NOTICED.
>> IF I COULD PIGGYBACK ON YOUR COMMENTS.
AS BOARD MEMBER GINGER MENTIONED THE OBJECTIVE OF THE OVERLAY IS TO PROTECT SURROUNDING RESIDENTIAL USES CLUSTER COMPLIMENTARY USES PROTECT SCENIC AND ENHANCE PHYSICAL APPEARANCE THROUGH DESIGN AND SIGNAGE CONTROL.
AND WITH THOSE THINGS CONSIDERED AS SHE MENTIONED, THE VIEW OF THIS, WHICH I INCLUDED IN STAFF REPORT.
I DON'T BELIEVE I HAVE A SLIDE FOR IT.
SHOWS HOW VISIBLE WINN-DIXIE IS BROADLY FROM THE SCENIC VIEW FROM THE ROADWAY. AND IT IS SUBSTANTIALLY BUFFERED NOT JUST FROM DIRECTION IT FACES BUT FURTHERMORE FROM TREE
BUFFERING. >> MY REAL CONCERN HERE IS THAT WE HAVE NOT JUST OVER 24-SQUARE FEET.
BUT A HUGE EXCEPTION TO THE 24-SQUARE FEET.
AND TWO SIGNS ON THE SAME FACED. >> SO THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO GRANT AN EXCEPTION I THINK IT NEEDS TO BE BY WAY -- IN MY OPINION IT NEEDS TO BE WAY OF VARIANCE.
AND IN ORDER TO DO THAT, I THINK WE NEED DOT EVERY I AND CROSS EVERY T IN THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT VARIANCE.
UNFORTUNATELY WE DON'T HAVE LEGAL TO TELL US.
I LIKE THE CHANGE PERSONALLY. [INAUDIBLE]
WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE SIGN? >> THE NEW SIZE.
>> YEAH. THE ONE FOR LIQUOR STORE -- [INAUDIBLE] THE NEW SIGN SAID WINN-DIXIE WINE AND SPIRITS IS 34-SQUARE FEET.
>> AND THE BIG SIGN IS -- THE BIG SIGN JUST REPLACING THE BIG
WINN-DIXIE ISN'T THAT BIG OF A BUILDING.
[00:25:12]
[INAUDIBLE] AGAINING I HATE TO GO BACK TO EXEMPTION. I FIND BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION IT'S TRYING TO SPEAK TO SITUATIONS LIKE THIS WHERE MAYBE WE'RE NOT SPEAKING TO BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR.BECAUSE THAT'S A CHANGE. WHEN WE COME IN AND WE ARE TALKING ABOUT WINN-DIXIE REPLACING A WINN-DIXIE SIGN WITH ONE THAT IS NEWER AND PROBABLY MORE TO CURRENT LOGO SPECIFICATION, I THINK THAT MAYBE BE CONSIDERED BY THE
BOARD. >> WHAT IS THE EXISTING SIGNS
SQUARE FOOTAGE? >> MY NAME IS SAMANTHA GENSLER.
THE EXISTING SIGN FOR THE MAIN SIGN IS 198 SQUARE FEET.
WE'RE TURNING INTO 166.3 SQUARE FEET.
THE SECONDARY SIGN THE EXISTING WAS 20 AND WE CHANGE IT 34.29 SQUARE FEET. [INAUDIBLE] AGAIN, IT'S JUST I WOULD ASK THE BOARD TO RECALL AFTERMATH YOU CAME THROUGH AND LOTS OF PEOPLE WANTED TO REPLACE SIGNS, THERE WAS A LOT OF DISCUSSION AS TO WHAT WAS ACTUALLY REPLACEMENT AND WHAT WAS A SIGN. --
>> WHAT WOULD SQUARE FOOTAGE BE OF WIN DINGSY BEER WINE AND
I BELIEVE 8.75 FEET. >> NOT 10 INCHES.
>> I DO THINK THAT WINN-DIXIE DESIGNATION ON THAT.
>> THE QUESTION IS IT GOING TO STICK LIKE THE BIG SIGN CAN WE APPROVE IT AND THEN THE LITTLE SIGN COME BACK ONCE IT GOES THROUGH NONVARIANCE? RD MAY DO PLEASE.
THE SECONDARY SIGN IS ALLOWED AS SECONDARY STOREFRONT BUT OBVIOUSLY, YES, IT EXCEEDS THE SIGN SIZE ALLOWANCE.
>> I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.
>> WE COULD GIVE THEM A VARIANCE.
JUST BECAUSE BECAUSE BEING FOO BIG.
UNDER MY INTERPRETATION YOU COPASS IT WITH THE EXEMPTION I MENTIONED OR YOU COULD WE CAN FINISH THE APPLICATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS FOR NONZONING AIRIANS AND APPROVE IT ALONG WITH THAT IF THIS BOARD SO CHOOSES.
>> I'M OKAY WITH APPROVING IT. >> I AM TOO.
>> I DON'T WANT THE VARIANCE TO BE A PROBLEM.
>> IF THE NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AND LEGAL CONSTRAINTS CAN BE DONE EX POST FACTO. WE COULD IMPROVE THE VARIANCE NOW I DON'T KNOW THAT'S POSSIBLE.
>> >> AGAIN THE APPLICATION GENERALLY SPEAKING WAS PROPERLY NOTICED AND ADVERTISED AND I UNDERSTAND THAT A NONZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION WAS NOT.
TIME FRAME WAS WHEN I DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT THE SPECIAL
[00:30:03]
NEED FOR NONZONING VARIANCE. THE TIME FRAME WAS VERY SHORT AND THE POTENTIAL THAT EVEN IF I HAD PASSED THROUGH TAP APPLICATION THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN ADEQUATE TIME TO IMPROVE IT IN THE PUBLIC NOTICING REQUIREMENTS.I DON'T -- DON'T REALLY KNOW WHAT TO ADVICE.
I BELIEVE THAT THERE'S BEEN PROPER PUBLIC NOTICE FOR THIS ITEM. AND BECAUSE OF THAT I THINK IF YOU WANT TO PURSUE A NONZONING VARIANCE FOR IT, THAT WOULD BE PRESENT OR WE CAN ADD A CONDITION.
WE WITH ADD WITH APPROVAL. I CAN REACH OUT TO LEGAL.
>>> WE WITH DO IT THE OTHER WAY. WE CAN'T APPROVE SUBJECT TO LEGAL TELLING US WE CAN'T. YES, SIR.
>> I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO PROVE IT.
I DON'T THINK YOU SAY IT'S NOT. >> WE CAN MAKE AN APPROVAL CONDITIONAL ON LEGAL TELLING US WE CAN DO IT.
I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE IT. SUBJECT TO AN OPINION OF LEGAL TELLING US THAT WE CAN HAVE THIS BE A NONZONING VARIANCE AS WELL
AS APPROVAL OF THE DESIGN. >> DO WE HAVE A SECOND?
THANK YOU. >> ITEM NUMBER FOUR.
[Item 4]
MADRB2020-05BBVA COMPASS. IT'S A BANK.REQUEST THREE INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED WALL SIGN REPLACEMENTS AT 3805 ASA SOUTH. THE INTERESTING THING IS THAT THIS BUILDING ACTUALLY MANAGES TO FRONT ON THREE STREETS.
SO THEY ARE ASKING FOR A SIGN ON EACH STREET.
ORTHAN THAT, THAT'S IT'S KUSH A CURE YOU YOUSITY AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH. I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT MIGHT BE ON THE LINE FOR US. JUST BE AWARE OF THAT IF YOU
WANTED TO CALL THEM. >> IS SOMEONE ON THE LINE FOR
>> IS THAT YOU DIANE? OR ARE YOU REPRESENTATIVE OF
OKAY. IS THERE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE
TO ADD TO APPLICATION. >> NO, SIR.
>> DIANE, DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS REGARDING
>> I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE KELLY GIVE US HER FULL NAME AND
CAN WE HAVE A VOTE ON THIS. I MOVE WE ACCEPT THE APPLICATION
>> WE HAVE MOTION TO ADJOURN. >> MOTION TO ADJOURN.
>> DIANE SECOND. >> I SECOND IT.
>> WE'RE ADJOURNED,
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.