[Infrastructure Delivery Team — CIP Request Review]
[00:14:31]
>> WE WOULD DO THE TYPICAL LED. IS SOMETHING WE CAN DO WITH
[00:14:35]
PARKS. IT IS PROBABLY GOING TO BE MORE[00:14:37]
GETTING THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO THE LOCATION VERSUS THE COST OFTHE ACTUAL LIGHTS. >> SO THAT'S PROBABLY MORE
EVALUATING FIRST. >> YOU GUYS THINK 100,000 WOULD
DO. >> THE EXPANSION SAME THING,
[00:15:06]
GETS OFF OF OUR FIVE-YEAR PLAN. THE EXPANSION.WE HAVE THE PROPERTY ACROSS THE STREET THAT WE ARE CURRENTLY DOING SOME PARKING AT BUT THIS WOULD BE QUITE A WAYS OFF FROM THAT. THAT IS RIVERDALE THAT WE HAVE PARKING ACROSS THE STREET. PALMO IS THE PROPERTY, THE BOAT RAMP, THE BOAT RAMP EXPANSION, IF YOU'VE NEVER BEEN OUT THERE, IT'S GORGEOUS. A BEAUTIFUL PROPERTY ON THE
RIVER. >> WE HAVE A BOAT RAMP.
THERE IS A PROPERTY THAT WE OWN. I'M ASSUMING IT WAS AN INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY AT ONE POINT IN TIME.
IT'S PRETTY MUCH JUST WAITING TO BE DEVELOPED AT SOME POINT IN
TIME. >> WOULD IT JUST BE ADDITIONAL
PARKING? >> PARKING, KAYAK LAUNCH.
IT HAS SOME LAND TO IT. PAVILION TYPE OF THING.
>> THAT'S PART OF THE WATERWAY ACCESS EXPANSION PROGRAM THAT WE PUT TOGETHER A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, AND THIS IS ONE OF THEM,
THE CAPACITY EXPANSION. >> IT WAS EVALUATED ON THAT PROCESS, WE DID EVALUATE THE BOAT RAMP SITES.
>> THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO COMMUNITY UPGRADE SINCE WE HAVE A PRIORITY OF COMPLETING ALL THE REGIONAL PARKS.
WE DEFINITELY PRIORITIZE THAT AND ALSO SIMILAR TO LIBRARY, IF WE ARE PRIORITIZING PUTTING IN THOSE NEW REGIONAL PARKS, IT WOULD BE GOOD TO EVALUATE A CAPACITY AND THE IMPACT ON THE NEED FOR EXPANSION FOR EXISTING PARKS.
AND I'M TALKING ABOUT THE UPGRADE, THE LIGHTING FOR THE PARKING LOT. SIMILAR TO THIS, WE ARE PRIORITIZING FAMILIES. SO I KNOW IT'S A FUTURE PROJECT BUT WE JUST NEED TO BE ON THE SAME PAGE.
>> 100%. >> PEACE PARK WAS PRESENTED.
>> THIS MAY BE A DUPLICATE. THIS IS PHASE TWO AND AGAIN THAT WAS ON THE RADAR BEFORE THE ORIGINAL PARKS CAME TO BE FUNDED THROUGH THE IMPACT FEES. THAT IS A RESTROOM AND BLEACHERS. SO THAT IS OFF OF OUR FIVE-YEAR
PLAN AT THIS POINT IN TIME. >> SO FUTURE YEAR FUNDINGS.
>> THERE IS DESIGN ALREADY FOR THAT.
RIVERTOWN IMPROVEMENTS IS A CONCESSION STAND AND RESTROOMS AT THE SITE. THIS SITE HAS SEEN SOME SIGNIFICANT UPGRADES IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS INCLUDING THE PARKING LOT EXPANSION AND LIGHTS TO THE FACILITY.
THIS WOULD BE ONE THAT I WOULD IDENTIFY AS POTENTIAL TO UTILIZE FOR WHEN WE LOOK AT FUNDS FOR OTHER PROGRAMING.
>> LIKE -- THE TTC AND IMPACT USE ARE BOTH BEING USED, $600,000 BUT IN REGARDS WHETHER IT'S FOR WALL DRAIN OR FOR LIGHTS, COUNTY-WIDE LIGHTS OR WHATEVER IT IS, THIS WOULD BE ONE THAT'S WHEN YOU LOOK AT PRIORITIZING THE DOLLARS, IT COULD BE BUMPED DOWN THE ROAD. AGAIN, IT DOES HAVE DESIGN IN PLACE SO IT CAN MOVE. IT WOULD BE SHOVEL READY.
>> THAT WOULD BE 2027. WE KNOW WE CAN BE READY TO GO WHEN WE HAVE THE FUNDS. DOES THAT SOUND GOOD TO EVE
EVERYONE? >> SCHOOLHOUSE UPGRADES IS AT THE FAIRGROUNDS. THAT IS UPGRADES TO THE BUILDING FACILITY THERE. THAT IS TTC CATEGORY THREE LIKE WHAT WE JUST TALKED ABOUT FOR RIVERTOWN.
HAVING THE CONVERSATIONS ABOUT FINDING THE FUNDS FOR AND PRIORITIZING, THIS WOULD GO TO THAT LEVEL THREE TO BE NOT PRIORITIZED AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
[00:20:06]
SHANDS BRIDGE PIER IS DOWN THE ROAD.THERE ARE SOME ELEMENTS OF IMPROVEMENT THAT WILL COME FROM THE STATE WHEN THIS COMES ON BOARD WE WILL STILL BE WORKING THROUGH THAT WITH THEM. WE'VE KIND OF JUST PUT THIS ON THE RADAR BECAUSE IT WILL BE COMING TO US BUT IT'S NOT IN THE
NEXT FUTURE YEARS AT ALL FOR US. >> AT SOME POINT, I CERTAINLY DON'T HAVE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT IS THE EXPECTATION BASED ON OUR AGREEMENT, WHEN WE DO TAKE OVER THE BRIDGE, DO WE HAVE TO PROVIDE SOME SORT OF RECREATIONAL FACILITY OR THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE HAVE DISCRETION TO DO ANYTHING WITH IT BECAUSE WE JUST NEED TO UNDERSTAND IF WE HAVE DISCRETION TO DO IT OR NOT DO IT. THAT WOULD BE LEGAL AT SOME
POINT. >> WE WILL FOLLOW UP WITH THAT.
THERE IS SOME ELEMENTS THAT THEY WILL BE PROVIDING WITH SOME PARKING AND ACCESS TO IT FOR I THINK THE TEAM'S INTERNAL THOUGHT WAS YOU ARE REPLICATING THE PIER ALONG THE RIVER.
>> THIS IS JUST A PIER, NOT A LAUNCH?
CORRECT. >> THE PARKING PERMITS, DID YOU
WANT TO TALK ABOUT THAT? >> THAT IS FUTURE YEARS, THAT'S THE SAME AS PLANTATION WEEK. THE SECOND PART OF THAT DESIGN WAS RESTROOMS AND BLEACHERS. I CALL IT STADIUM ESQUE.
IT'S NOT A STADIUM BUT IT'S USING BLEACHERS TO CREATE A SET UP FOR THAT PIER BUT THOSE ARE THINGS THAT WERE PART OF OUR FIVE-YEAR PLAN PRIOR TO BEFORE PARKS COMING ONLINE.
SO THEY ARE SHOVEL READY. IF WE EVER FIND A GRANT OR THE DOLLARS ARE ACCESSIBLE, THEY WOULD BE READY TO GO.
>> ALL OF THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE QUALIFIED FOR CRA
FUNDS, RIGHT? >> I WOULD THINK SO.
>> IF THERE ARE SMALLER AMOUNTS PRIORITIZED BY THE COMMUNITY, THE TURF FIELD WAS 2 MILLION SO IT WAS BIGGER.
BUT THAT CAME OUT OF GENERAL FUND.
SO THE IMPACT FEE -- >> THAT WAS TDT.
>> THE NEXT ONE, 600,000 CURRENTLY APPROVED.
THIS IS FOR ALTERNATES THAT WOULD BE THE DECKING AROUND IT, THERE ARE SOME EXISTING SUNSHADES AND IT IS TO RESURFACE THE SPLASH PAD THAT IS OVER THERE.
AND WE COULD HAVE A -- WE HAD A MEETING ABOUT A WEEK OR SO AGO TO DISCUSS SOME IDEAS THAT THEY HAVE THAT THEY ARE ALSO WILLING TO FUND, VERBALLY, THEY ARE WILLING TO FUND BUT PART OF IT IS WITH THE SPLASH PAD. SO IT'S PROBABLY A FURTHER CONVERSATION ONCE WE GET TO THAT POINT BUT WE ARE ABOUT TO PUT OUT FOR SOLICITATION THE ACTUAL SHELL, AND THEN WE WILL WORK WITH BRIAN'S GROUP ON THE TIMELINES BECAUSE WE DO HAVE A WINDOW TO ACTUALLY DO THIS WORK. SO THAT'S WHAT THE ADDITIONAL 200,000 IS FOR. SO IT'S PART OF THE OVERALL
PROJECT AND IT NEEDS TO STAY. >> IT DOES.
THE 600,000 IS SOMEWHAT OF AN ESTIMATE THAT IS CURRENTLY IN PLACE. WE CAN THINK IT IS BASED ON HISTORICAL INFORMATION, WE DO THINK IT'S SUFFICIENT TO DO THE SHELL. THIS WOULD BE TO DO THE
ANCILLARY STUFF. >> IS THIS ELIGIBLE FOR THAT AS
>> THERE ARE FUNDS. IT IS FAIRLY HEALTHY.
[00:25:12]
>> THEY HAVE SOME COST SHARING IN THEIR CONTRACT.
>> PART OF THAT CONVERSATION IS SPECIFIC TO THE SPLASH PAD.
SO AGAIN, THAT MAY BE PART OF THE BIGGER CONVERSATION.
>> SPLASH PAD IS LIKE SPLASH PARK.
WHO WANTS THAT? >> IT HAS BEEN THERE.
IT IS EXISTING. >> IT'S ALREADY THERE? SO THEY ARE NOT A BIG FANS MEANING THEY WANT TO REMOVE IT?
>> HIGH LEVEL, THEY WOULD LIKE TO PUT IN A POOL JUST TO TEACH YOUNG CHILDREN HOW TO SWIM SO THAT THEY CAN ISOLATE THEM FROM THE BIG POOL, WHICH IS VERY BUSY, IT WAS BUSY THE DAY THAT I WAS THERE BUT AGAIN, THEY ARE ALSO WILLING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE FUNDING FOR THAT. SO AGAIN, IT MAY BE A BIGGER
CONVERSATION. >> OKAY, THAT SOUNDS LIKE A BIG BENEFIT IF WE CAN MAKE THE FINANCES WORK.
REMOVE THE MAINTENANCE COST. >> EXACTLY.
>> 207, REGIONAL PARK. MOST OF IT IS BEYOND THE FIVE-YEAR PLAN THAT WOULD BE DESIGN OF THE PARK, THE 25,000 IS OUT OF IMPACT ZONE D, AND THAT IS PROVIDING SOME CLEARING ACCESS TO THE SITE. WE WILL START TO LOOK AT THE POTENTIAL TO UTILIZE THE SITE FOR AFFORDABLE, LIMITED RECREATION. THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING LIKE THE DISK GOLF OR SOMETHING THAT WOULDN'T BE A DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE THAT WE WOULD AT LEAST BE ABLE TO BE USING IT FOR THE FIRST FEW YEARS BUT THIS WOULD BE THE START OF THAT, BEING ABLE TO GET IN AND CREATE THAT ACCESS THERE.
>> WOULD IT BE PRUDENT TO CAPTURE THE TOTAL FUTURE COST? THAT THING IS GOING TO BE A 20. I THINK THAT GIVES YOU A BETTER, MORE ACCURATE PICTURE OF YOUR FUTURE UNFUNDED PROJECTS.
BECAUSE THAT IS OUR NEXT REGIONAL PARK ONCE WE ARE DONE
WITH THE OTHER COUNTY. >> WE WILL TAKE THE ACREAGE UPLAND AND YOU WOULD QUALIFY IT AGAINST SOMETHING THAT IS EXISTING, WHATEVER IT IS AND AS AN EXAMPLE, BASED ON $2026, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS AMOUNT OF ACREAGE -- I FEEL LIKE THAT MAY BE -- UPLAND IS VERY HIGH AND IT'S A CLOSED 40 ACRES.
>> DO WE KNOW HOW MANY ARE BUILDABLE?
>> I THINK IT'S NORTH OF 35. >> I WANT TO SAY IT WAS 33.
>> HOW MUCH IS IT? >> IT WILL PROBABLY BE CLOSER
BECAUSE IT IS A SPORTS PARK. >> GREENBRIAR POTENTIALLY WOULD BE BECAUSE IT'S ABOUT 25 ACRES OF ACTUAL BUILDABLE PARK BUT THERE IS THAT ENTRY SO WE COULD USE A PER ACRE COST.
IT'S BEST WE USE A PER ACRE COST.
>> BECAUSE OF THE LOCATION OF IT, IT MAY BE A GOOD TOURNAMENT LOCATION FOR SPORTS CONFERENCE THAN COMMUNITY.
BECAUSE THERE IS NOTHING AROUND IT.
COMMUNITY PARKS, FEATURES. >> IT IS HARD.
AS THE IMPACT -- WE SEE WHERE THE DEVELOPMENT IS.
>> I'M KIND OF TALKING OUT LOUD WITHOUT CONSIDERATION OF FUNDS JUST ABOUT THE FUTURE GOOD FOR LOCATION BECAUSE IT'S RIGHT OFF
THE 95. >> AND THE COMBINATION OF BEING ATTACHED TO THE FAIRGROUNDS CREATES A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY FOR
USE. >> HOW MUCH IS THE SILVER
LAKE COMPLEX? >> THAT IS HIGH 30S.
>> I'M SORRY, SILVER LEAF, IT IS THE HIGH 30S.
>> SO PROBABLY 30 AROUND. THAT IS A BIG FUTURE PROJECT
THAT WE NEED TO GET READY FOR. >> WE WILL WORK ON FINE TUNING
[00:30:05]
SOMETHING BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF WHAT WE HAVE EXISTING.>> LITTLE LEAGUE UPGRADES OFF THE FIVE-YEAR PLAN TALKING PARK IMPACT FEES AND TD T.. PRIORITIZING WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THE FOURMAC REGIONAL PARKS IN WALDRON.
THIS IS TO UPGRADE THE PARKING COMPONENT AS A MAJOR PART OF THAT THEY HAVE SOME GRASS PARKING AT THE SITE.
WE DID NEW RECENT UPGRADES AT LITTLE LEAGUE PARK WE DID THE OLD BALL FIELD LIGHTS. RIGHT WHEN WE TRANSITIONED TO YOU, JOY, THAT WAS YOUR FIRST BUDGET CYCLE.
SO THAT IS FAR DOWN THE ROAD AS WELL.
>> MY FIRST BUDGET CYCLE? WHEN WAS THAT?
>> WHEN YOU WERE FIRST AN ADMINISTRATOR?
>> I WAS GOING TO SAY, I'VE BEEN HERE FOR A LONG TIME BUDGET
CYCLE 2006. >> THAT WAS PROBABLY THE TOTAL BUDGET. TREE PARK EXPANSION.
-- TREATY PARK EXPANSION. A LOT OF THAT IS DOWN OFF OF THE FIVE-YEAR PLAN. THAT IS EXPANDING A POND WITH THE PUMP TRACK ET CETERA. TROUT CREEK EXPANSION, AGAIN, ORIGINALLY PLANNED OUT FOR PARK IMPACT FEE ZONE A.
THESE ARE ALL ON OUR FIVE-YEAR PLAN PRIOR TO TALKING ABOUT PAYING OFF THE BOND SERVICES. TWIN CREEKS EXPANSION, WE ARE WORKING WITH A DEVELOPER TO GET TO A POINT TO GET TO COMPLETION OF BUILDING THOSE FOURMAC PARKS. THAT WILL BE FOURMAC SOCCER FIELDS OR RECTANGULAR FIELDS WITH LIGHTS.
THAT IS ALL THE DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR.
THE TIMING OF THAT HAS BEEN KICKED DOWN THE ROAD FOR AT LEAST THE PAST FIVE YEARS HERE. IT'S HARD TO IDENTIFY WHEN THOSE DOLLARS WOULD BE NEEDED. BUT WHEN THAT HAPPENS, PARKING,
RESTROOMS ARE NOT INCLUDED. >> WE WANT TO PUT THEM IN JAIL.
>> THE SAME TYPE OF THING. WE DID A STUDY AND EVALUATED.
THIS WOULD BE TO ADD TO THE CURRENT FLOATING DOCK.
IT IS HEAVILY USED. DOING SOMETHING SIMILAR, WE HAVE OPTIONS THAT PROVIDED THE Q SHAPE AND THAT TALKS THROUGH THE COMPONENTS OF EXPANDING UPON COMMERCIAL USE AT THAT SITE AND ALLOWING FOR FOCUSED RECREATIONAL USE AT THAT SITE.
THOSE DOLLARS WERE PUT IN PLACE FROM THAT STUDY BUT AGAIN LOOKING AT THE WALDRON BOAT RAMP AS A PRIORITY TO GET COMPLETED CACTUS WOULD SLIDE DOWN OFF OF THE FIVE-YEAR PLAN.
THAT BRINGS US TO THE WALDRON FAMILY PARK AND THE BOAT RAMP.
RIGHT NOW, IN FISCAL YEAR 27, WE HAVE, THE DEPARTMENT HAS LOOKED TO ALLOCATE $500,000 FROM PARK ZONE C OVER A TIME.
AND PUT THAT IN OUR FIVE-YEAR PLAN AND THEN THE 1.5 MILLION IS A COMBINATION OF A LOT OF TT CATEGORY THREE CONTINGENCIES, REMAINING BUDGET, OFFICIAL -- CALHOUN TURF REMAINING BUDGET TO PUT IN THERE. WE CONTINUE TO WORK WITH -- TO TALK ABOUT WHEN IS THE APPROPRIATE TIME TO GO AND ASK FOR ADDITIONAL DOLLARS. WE ARE JUST TRYING TO FOR LACK OF BETTER TERMS SQUIRREL UP AS MANY DOLLARS AS WE CAN TILL WE GET TO THE POINT THAT WE FEEL THAT WE CAN PHASE.
WE ARE CURRENTLY IN THE VERY BEGINNING OF THE DESIGN PHASE AT THAT SITE THAT IS FUNDED AND THAT WENT OUT AND WE WILL BE AWARDING THAT BID AND CONTRACT IN THE NEXT FEW MONTHS THAT WILL REALLY IDENTIFY THE DOLLAR AMOUNT AND RIGHT NOW WE IDENTIFIED THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS OFF THE MASTER PLAN AS OPPOSED
OF THE DESIGN. >> AND THE ACCESS POINTS ARE
ESTABLISHED. >> ONE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[00:35:02]
RIGHT NOW. >> THAT OTHER ONE, IT WILL NEED ADDITIONAL WORK AS WE COME INTO THE PARK, PARK IMPROVEMENTS, TO ALLOW THE BOATS TO TRAFFIC DOWN THERE.
>> ONCE YOU HAVE THE BOAT RAMP SET UP, THAT WOULD BE PART OF
THE FOUNDATION, YES. >> THERE IS A APPROPRIATION, I THINK IT'S A POINT -- I. THINK IT'S 2.5 MILLION EARMARKED BUT IT'S VERY SPECIFIC FOR PUBLIC SAFETY VESSEL STORAGE OR
SOMETHING LIKE THAT. >> I KNOW THERE WAS A PUBLIC SAFETY VESSEL THAT WAS BROUGHT UP EARLIER.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT WOULD QUANTIFY WHEN YOU LOOK ACROSS THAT. I THINK YOU WOULD BE LOOKING AT SETTING UP A SIMILAR THING THAT WE HAVEN'T RELIED ON WITH THE ACCESS SO THEY CAN HAVE A VEHICLE STORED THERE AND YOU CAN
PROVIDE THAT ACCESS THERE. >> WOULD YOU MIND, I DON'T THINK
IT HAS BEEN FINALIZED YET. >> WE JUST WANT TO LOOK AT THE CURRENT YEARS. I KNOW IT WAS CONTINGENCY FUNDING BUT JUST TO SEE WHAT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE THERE, WHAT CONTINGENCY FUNDING MAY BE ALLOCATED FOR.
>> THIS IS IN ZONE C, WHICH IS NOT PAYING BACK TO THE BOND.
A AND B ARE PAYING BACK TO THE BOND SO IT DOES HAVE THAT FLEXIBILITY AND WE ARE LOOKING TO WITHDRAW A LOT OF THINGS BACK
ON IMPACT. >> YOU ARE MORE OR LESS LOOKING TO EARMARK FUNDING TOWARDS A FUTURE PHASE.
>> DESIGN AND ENGINEERING WILL COME IN AND SAY THE BIGGEST EXPENSE IS GOING TO BE PHASE ONE WHICH WILL BE BUILDING THE BOAT RAMP AND THE ACCESS, AND THAT'S GOING TO BE A MAJOR EXPENSE.
BUT IF THEY COME IN AND SAY TO GET TO THAT POINT FOR PARKING, ACCESS, IT'S X AMOUNT OF DOLLARS AND THAT WILL BE THE FIRST TO TRY TO GET THERE AND SEE IF WE WANT TO PHASE CONSTRUCTION THAT
WAY. >> SIMILAR TO THE FIRE TRAIN FACILITY. WE CAN GET SOME PRIORITY PROJECTS IN THAT AREA AND THEY CONTINUE TO BUILD OUT.
>> PROBABLY HAVE TO SPEND THE MONEY ON STORAGE FOR PUBLIC SAFETY. THAT'S GRANT FUNDING.
AND LATER DOWN THE ROAD -- THAT MAKES SENSE SPEAKING OF THAT, ONE OF THE CIP. I DON'T WANT TO FORGET ABOUT IT.
WE HAD A CONVERSATION. IN FACT, IT WAS BROUGHT UP ABOUT THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY. I THINK THERE MAY BE SOME MOVEMENT WITH THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY IN TERMS OF THE LEGISLATIVE CHANGE. BUT IN LIGHT OF THAT, WE HAVE HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT POTENTIAL CONTRACTORS THAT CAN BE INTRODUCED TO THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY.
THE REASON I BROUGHT IT UP WAS BECAUSE ONE OF THE INDUSTRIES THAT IS INCREDIBLY HOT RIGHT NOW IS SHIP MAKING, SPECIFICALLY FOR MILITARY AND SO WE TALKED TO JAX USA ABOUT OUR WATERWAY ACCESS AND OUR COASTAL WATERWAY. BUT IT NEEDS AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF DREDGING AND THAT'S VERY EXPENSIVE.
IF THAT IS THE INDUSTRY WE MAY POTENTIALLY BE INTERESTED IN IF WE EVEN HAVE THE INFRASTRUCTURE, WE HAVE TO LOOK AT NAVIGABLE WAYS TO GET THE PRODUCT OUT WHICH OUR BRIDGE, BRIDGE I DON'T BELIEVE IS OPEN -- ABLE TO OPEN. I THINK THAT'S THE ONLY BRIDGE YOU CAN GO OUT. SO WE CAN LOOK AT SOMETHING LIKE THAT BUT IF THAT IS AN INTEREST, THAT IS PROBABLY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.
BUT SOMETHING TO PUT ON THE TABLE TO LOOK IN THE FUTURE IT'S THE ABILITY TO BE PART OF THAT AND THAT WOULD BE VERY BENEFICIAL I WANT TO LOOK AT MEETING ADJOURNMENT TO LOOK AT
IDEALLY WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE. >> THAT IS INTERESTING.
>> THAT WOULD CHANGE SAINT JOHN'S COUNTY ON THE BACK OF MILITARY CONTRACTS WITH AIRPORT AND POTENTIAL ACCESS TO THE
[00:40:07]
OCEAN. >> THEY SAY THEY HAVE TWO CURRENT CONTRACTS LOOKING FOR A PLACE TO GO.
WE WOULD LOVE THAT. >> THAT WOULD BE AWESOME.
>> TRYING TO THINK WHAT WOULD THEY NEEDED FOR.
>> THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IS THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO GET IT OUT AND THEN WE DON'T HAVE A WAY TO GET THERE.
>> BYE BYE ASSUMPTION IS THAT FAIRLY NEW.
>> THE LAST ONE WE HAVE FOR PARKS AND REC IS WORLD COMMERCE CENTRE, OUTDOOR COURTS. THIS CURRENTLY DOES HAVE SOME FUNDING. THIS IS AN ADDITIONAL REQUEST OF
500000 FOR THIS YEAR. >> I HAVE A THOUGHT ABOUT THIS.
PICKLEBALL IS VERY POPULAR AND IT'S BECOMING A VERY PREVALENT ENTERTAINMENT, AND PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO PAY BECAUSE THERE'S NOT ENOUGH FACILITY. I WONDER IF WE SHOULD ESTABLISH A SPECIAL REVENUE FUND LIKE A GOLF COURSE AND RUN IT LIKE A BUSINESS MODEL BECAUSE WE ARE LOOKING AT THE FEE SCHEDULE UPDATE. WE ARE TRYING TO BE CLOSER.
WE WILL NEVER BE CLOSE ENOUGH BUT CLOSE -- CLOSER TO RECRUIT THE EXPANSE OF UTILIZATION TO MATCH THE EXPENSE THAT WE INCUR FOR PICKLEBALL, SOMETHING LIKE THAT, IT'S NOT JUST CHILDREN.
IT IS ALL AGES. VERY SIMILAR TO A GOLF COURSE, PEOPLE HAVE THE ABILITY TO PAY. I WOULD SAY IT'S NOT ESSENTIAL SERVICES BUT IT'S DEFINITELY ENHANCEMENT OF QUALITY OF LIFE CAN WE HAVE A PICKLEBALL SPECIAL REVENUE FUND AND WE CAN LOOK AT POTENTIALLY HAVING BONDABLE REVENUE TO DO INDOOR FACILITY BECAUSE THOSE FACILITIES ARE SOUGHT AFTER AND PEOPLE ARE WILLING TO PAY A LOT TO RENT THE SPACE.
JUST A THOUGHT. >> WE HAD INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS ON THAT WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT A FACILITY HOW YOU WOULD MAXIMIZE USE OF THAT SO I THINK THE COMPONENT HAS THE ABILITY TO DO THAT THE OUTDOOR COMPONENT WOULD BE A LITTLE CHALLENGING AND THERE IS NO DOUBT, IT'S NOT GOING AWAY.
PEOPLE TRIED TO SAY THAT PICKLEBALL IS GOING AWAY.
IT IS VERY WELL ESTABLISHED AT THIS POINT IN TIME.
>> GIVEN THE UTILIZATION OF THE OUTDOOR BASED ON OUR WEATHER, IT MAY BE GOOD TO JUST LOOK AT A REALLY LARGE INDOOR FACILITY TO
RUN A SPECIAL REVENUE FUND. >> THE WORLD COMMERCE CENTRE AS AN FYI, WE CALLED IT THE RECREATION DESERT AND WORLD VILLAGE AREA A WHILE BACK AND WE PUT IT IN THE SPORTS COMPLEX.
>> I WAS THINKING, IT'S NOT A BAD IDEA.
WE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT IT. >> IT'S MULTIPLE STORIES.
>> IS YOUR PLAYING LEVEL BASED ON --
>> SERIOUSLY THOUGH, CAN WE ASSIGN SOMEONE TO EVALUATE THE SITE, EVALUATE THE COST AND EVALUATE THE BUSINESS MODEL? WHATEVER HAPPENS OUT THERE, I THINK A PICKLEBALL INDOOR FACILITY IS NOT GOING TO BE A WASTE.
IT WILL BE HIGHLY UTILIZED. MAYBE WE COULD MAKE SOME MONEY.
>> WE'VE GOT A CAFE, A NICE COFFEE SHOP, A JUICE BAR.
>> I LOVE IT. >> WE CAN DO AN INTRODUCTORY LOOK AT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND SAY HOW MANY COURTS CAN
[00:45:03]
POTENTIALLY GET IN THERE. >> THE IMAX.
>> THE E GAMES. >> OR YOU COULD GO AND WATCH A
MOVIE. >> ON HOW TO PLAY PICKLEBALL.
>> YOU DON'T PLAY? >> MORE OF A RACQUETBALL GUY.
WE COULD CLASSIFY THIS AS A TWO. WE DO HAVE SOME FUNDS THAT WE WOULD DO AS MUCH AS WE CAN WITH THE FUNDS AT THAT SITE.
SO WE COULD PHASE IN THAT SITE, SO WE WOULD GET THE EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DOLLARS WITH THE PLAN AND LET'S SAY LET'S BUILD AS MUCH AS WE CAN AND LEAVE IT LAID OUT TO POTENTIALLY COME BACK IN THE FUTURE. SO YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO HAVE BASKETBALL, TENNIS, PICKLEBALL AT THE SITE ALONG WITH A
RESTROOM. >> WOULD YOU WANT TO ADD A NEW CIP INDOOR HALL OF FAME PICKLEBALL FACILITY AND RANK
NUMBER 1? >> I WOULD SAY LET'S DO THE EXERCISE FIRST AND TAKE A LOOK AT --
>> WE COULD TAKE A LOOK AT THAT AND ANALYZE.
>> AND THE LIBRARY HUT ON THE SIDE.
THE LIBRARY -- THE AREA HAS BEEN LOOKING FOR A LIBRARY.
>> WE'VE COMPLETED RECREATION. WE STILL HAVE QUITE A WAYS TO GO. MOVING ON TO PUBLIC WORKS.
>> ATLANTIC VIEW DRAINAGE. THIS WAS IDENTIFIED THROUGH A LOT OF COMPLAINTS. ATLANTIC VIEW IS LOCATED EAST OF A 1A IN THE CRESCENT BEACH AREA. IT DOES NOT HAVE A DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN PLACE. THERE IS SOME FLOODING IN MAJOR RAIN EVENTS. IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT A $10 MILLION PROJECT. THE TEAM WAS ABLE TO COME DOWN AND REDUCE THE COST TO $8 MILLION FOR THE DESIGN IS NEAR COMPLETION. THIS HAS BEEN A KNOWN AREA FOR
QUITE SOME TIME. >> WE HAVE GONE THROUGH ALL OF THE STEPS. THE CANAL BOULEVARD SIDEWALK.
WE ARE COMPLETING THE SIDEWALK FROM A ONE A BASICALLY TO THE BRIDGE. SO YOU'LL HAVE CONNECTIVITY ALL THE WAY THROUGH. THIS IS TO ADD ADDITIONAL CONNECTIVITY. ONE OF THE QUESTIONS THAT CAME UP PREVIOUSLY IS CAN WE USE IT FOR THIS TYPE OF PROJECT.
WE DID REACH OUT TO OCA ABOUT THAT.
THEY FEEL IT'S REASONABLE. THEY ARE STILL LOOKING INTO IT A LITTLE BIT MORE BUT SINCE IT'S PART OF OUR TRANSPORTATION NETWORK, THEY THINK THIS IS A GOOD USE OF IMPACT FEES.
BUT IT'S NOT 100%. THE COUNTY WIDE BRIDGE AND CULVERT SAFETY. THE COUNTY MAINTAINS OVER 16 DIFFERENT BRIDGES. THEY ARE INSPECTED EVERY OTHER YEAR BY THE DOT THAT PROVIDES RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REPAIRS OR FOR MAINTENANCE ITEMS. WE PUT A MILLION DOLLARS IN THERE ANNUALLY BUT NEXT YEAR WE ASKED FOR 1.5 BECAUSE WE HAVE A PROGRAM CREATED BASED ON REPORTS THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE DOT.
THIS IS KIND OF A NEW PROGRAM FOR US.
WE'VE ONLY HAD IT IN PLACE FOR FOURMAC YEARS NOW.
IT DOESN'T HAVE A COUNTY WIDE. WE ARE STILL CATCHING UP FROM SOME OF THE REPORTS WE DIDN'T HAVE IN PLACE OR DIDN'T RESPOND TO. SO WE FEEL LIKE A MILLION DOLLARS ANNUALLY WILL ALWAYS KEEP OUR BRIDGES IN GOOD RECOGNITION. WE DO HAVE AN INDEX.
WE ARE WORKING ON SOMETHING WITH OUR BRIDGES TO SHARE WITH THE PUBLIC TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE COMFORTABLE WITH THE CONDITIONS OF OUR BRIDGES AND HOW WE ARE MAINTAINING THEM.
THIS IS JUST MAINTENANCE. IT'S NOT REPLACEMENT.
BRIDGES THAT HAVE TO BE REPLACED WE PUT THEM IN A STAND-ALONE.
LUCKILY, WE DON'T HAVE MANY OF THEM LEFT.
COUNTY WIDE DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE CACTUS IS ANOTHER PROGRAM THAT HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A LONG TIME CURRENTLY, WE ARE LOOKING AT CORRUGATED METAL PLATES THAT ARE ALONG OUR
[00:50:02]
STREETS AND MAJOR LINE OF COLLECTORS.LOOKING AT THE CONDITION, THEIR AGE AND THE APPROPRIATE MEASURES. THAT'S THE LOWEST COST -- WE SPENT THE 3.5 MILLION ANNUALLY EACH YEAR FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS BECAUSE OF THE AMOUNT OF PIPES IN THE GROUND THAT WE HAVE TO MAINTAIN. WE REVIEW THIS THROUGH OUR FIRST EYES IN THE FIELD, OUR SUPERVISORS.
WE ALSO HAVE OUR PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO TRY AND GET OUT IN FRONT OF THAT A COUPLE OF YEARS TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL DRAINAGE IS COMPLETE BEFORE WE PAVE.
THE THIRD ONE IS WE HAVE A MODEL WITH ALL THE INFORMATION WE CURRENTLY HAVE TO REVIEW THAT AND IDENTIFY DIFFERENT AGES AND TYPES OF MATERIAL THAT WE NEED TO REVIEW AND ADDRESS.
>> ARE THEY ADEQUATELY FUNDED WE.
>> WE WOULD SPEND A LOT OF MONEY ON THIS ANNUALLY BUT WE FEEL LIKE THAT KEEPS US IN WORKING CONDITION.
>> THE REASON I ASK IS I KNOW WE TALKED ABOUT STORMWATER ASSESSMENT AND THOSE ADDITIONAL REVENUE OPTIONS COULD POTENTIALLY BE AVAILABLE IF THE FUNDING BECOMES AN ISSUE.
>> ONE OF THE THINGS IN SAINT JOHNS COUNTY, THERE'S A LOT OF INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S AGING. OF COURSE THERE ARE A LOT OF AREAS THAT DON'T HAVE STORMWATER SYSTEMS OR THEY HAVE STORMWATER SYSTEMS THAT AREN'T ADEQUATE. THEY WERE BUILT BEFORE PERMITTING SO THEY CAN'T HANDLE THE TYPE OF EVENTS THAT WE HAVE HERE. IT'S LIKE THREE DIFFERENT BUCKETS. THIS IS PURELY FOR REPLACING OF THE EXISTING ONES, WHETHER IT'S NEW ONES THAT DON'T HAVE ANYTHING, WE -- THOSE ARE GREAT TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH BECAUSE THEY ARE LOCALIZED BENEFITS FOR THE COMMUNITY.
WE ARE SHARING THE COST ACROSS THE COUNTY THESE HAVE BEEN USED IN THE PAST WE TALKED ABOUT THAT IN THE PAST BUT IT'S
CHALLENGING. >> I THINK AND I THINK JESSE HAD SOME THOUGHTS BUT I THINK ONCE YOU START THE STORMWATER MODEL IDENTIFYING NEW PROJECTS, NOT REPAIR REPLACEMENT, MAY BE DEDICATED STAFF TO USE IT AS A OPTION, ACTUALLY A PREFERRED OPTION TO EVALUATE THE LEGALITY, THE FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR THE RESIDENTS, ESTABLISHED A BENEFIT FOR THEM.
THAT MAY BE THE APPROACH WE HAVE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH SINCE COUNTY WIDE FUNDS ARE ONLY FOR STORM WATER.
AND THEN THE IMPACT FEE -- >> WE HAVE LOOKED AT A UTILITY RATES. WE'VE LOOKED AT IT, WE HAVE A GUIDELINE OF HOW THAT WOULD WORK MOVING FORWARD.
WHO WOULD BE EXEMPT, WHO WOULD BE PART OF IT SO WE ARE NOT STARTING FROM SCRATCH HERE IT COMES UP EVERY SEVEN TO TEN
YEARS. >> I ALMOST FEEL LIKE OUR ID NEEDS A SEPARATE TOPIC JUST TO TALK ABOUT MSVU, MSTU FOR DIFFERENT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS BECAUSE IT'S ALSO APPLICABLE TO COAST MANAGEMENT AND STORMWATER BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL LOCALIZED BENEFITS. SO WE MAY WANT THESE PEOPLE TO ALWAYS THINK IS THERE A WAY TO FUND THIS THROUGH MSVU, AND THAT PREVENTS THE LANE. YOU HAVE A FUNDING MECHANISM IN
PLACE THAT CAN BE HEALTHY. >> IT COULD BE HEALTHY.
A LOT OF THE DRAINAGE IS A BENEFIT IN THAT COMMUNITY PEER YOU ARE THE ONES BENEFITING FROM THIS PROJECT.
SOME OF THE NEWER COMMUNITIES PAY FOR IT ALREADY THEY PAY THROUGH IT THROUGH THE PURCHASE OF THEIR HOUSE PEER SOME OF THE OTHER ONES, IT WAS NEVER PART OF THE HOUSE PURCHASE BECAUSE IT
DIDN'T EXIST AT THE TIME. >> AND IT'S A ONE TIME CAPITAL EXPENSE. SIMILAR TO BEACH OR NOURISHMENT THAT WE DID, THERE IS GOING TO BE ASSESSMENT BUT IT'S NOT IN PERPETUITY AND THEN YOU HAVE AN ASSET THAT WE ARE GOING TO INCLUDE AS OUR COUNTY WIDE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
MAYBE IT'S TIME TO START IDENTIFYING THOSE PROJECTS.
ONCE WE HAVE A PROJECT, THAT CAN BE REPLICATED IN OTHER PARTS OF THE COUNTY. IT MEANS WE HAVE SOMETHING TO OFFER BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IF WE HAVE A NEED, WE DON'T HAVE A WAY TO OFFER IT BECAUSE THE FUNDING IS NONEXISTENT.
[00:55:02]
>> THEN WE MOVE DOWN TO COUNTY WIDE SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS WE USE THAT FOR THINGS THAT COME UP THROUGHOUT THE YEAR IT'S HARD TO PROGRAM THAT OUT BECAUSE WE'RE CONTINUOUSLY LOOKING AT OUR INFRASTRUCTURE AND AREAS WE NEED TO ADDRESS.
WE PUT IN SOME NEW BEACONS AND CROSS BUMPERS WHERE STUDENTS ARE GOING BACK AND FORTH. THAT COULD BE USED OUT OF THIS.
AND OUR COUNTY WIDE SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION.
>> LET'S GO BACK TO SAFETY IMPROVEMENT.
THAT WOULD BE THE PROGRAM AS THE IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE FOR THE COUNTY WIDE SAFETY STUDY WE ARE DOING AND HOPEFULLY CAN BE REPLENISHED WITH SOME GRANT FUNDING.
>> WE PUT THAT IN THE OPERATING BUDGET.
>> I MEANT DOWN THE ROAD IF YOU HAVE TO DO IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND RESPOND TO THE STUDY, THAT'S WHERE WE WOULD BE.
>> IT WOULD BE IN THERE DEPENDENT ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS. A LOT OF THESE THINGS, IT'S GOING TO BE THE LITTLE THINGS THAT YOU ARE SAYING.
>> OUR COUNTY WIDE SIDEWALKS PROGRAM.
THAT IS WE HAVE TWO DIFFERENT THINGS.
THE NEW TOWNHOMES OVER THERE, WE WERE ABLE TO DO A PORTION OF SIDEWALKS WHICH CREATED A GAP SO WE COULD PULL THAT IN CREATING MORE ACROSS THE COUNTY AS IT EXPANDS AS WELL AS MAJOR REPAIRS ON OUR CURRENT 620,000 SIDEWALKS.
ANYTHING THAT WOULD TAKE OVER A WEEK FOR THEM TO ADDRESS A LONG STRETCH, WE WOULD USE THIS TO CONTRACT THAT OUT.
COUNTY WIDE SIGNAL RETIMING IS A CONSTANT BATTLE.
WE ARE OUT THERE LOOKING AT CORRIDORS, STARTING NORTH AND SOUTH AND WE CONTINUE LOOKING AT RETIMING OF THESE CORRIDORS AS NEW IMPROVEMENTS OR CHANGES IN A ROADWAY SYSTEM.
CHANGE WITH 22 '09 COMING IN TYING INTO 16.
IT'S NEVER A COMPLETED PROJECT. IT'S A CONSTANT CYCLE OF REDOING WHAT WE DID. AND THEN STORMWATER MODELING, THIS WILL GET US BACK WHERE WE WERE A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO.
WE HAD SOME MONEY IN THERE TO KEEP MAINTENANCE AS DEVELOPMENT COMES IN PEER AS DEVELOPMENTS COME IN, THEY TAKE THE MODEL AND SEE THE IMPACTS OF WHAT THEY WOULD HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. THEY HELPED US IN THE PAST FOR BUILDING, THEY HELPED US FUND THIS PROGRAM.
THAT'S WHAT WE ARE LOOKING TO DO AGAIN THIS COMING YEAR, GET THIS BACK TO A STATE WHERE IT WAS BEFORE.
I THINK I PASSED OVER THE COUNTY WIDE SIGNALIZATION PROGRAM.
WE PUT THIS IN A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO BECAUSE OUR SIGNALS, HOW DO WE GET AN ABILITY TO MAKE QUICK RESPONSES TO ISSUES THAT ARISE.
THESE ARE USED FOR VETERANS, WE CAN PULL THE DOLLARS OUT OF HERE TO START THE DESIGN AND THEN USE THIS AS SOME OF THE FUNDING TO MATCH THE OTHER FUNDING TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT.
>> WE HAVE THE PROGRAM HOPEFULLY WE ARE GETTING SOMETHING FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE. THAT WOULD BE A PERFECT WAY THAT WE COULD MATCH IT. COUNTY WIDE STRIPING, WE HAD A PROGRAM THAT EVERY FOUR YEARS WE ARE LOOKING AT A QUADRANT IN SAINT JOHNS COUNTY TO RESTRIPE ALL OF THE MAJOR AND MINOR CONNECTOR ROADS TO ENHANCE SAFETY AND TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE VISIBLE AS WELL AS THE REFLECTIVITY THINGS YOU SEE IN THE ROAD. ONCE THEY GO AWAY AND COME BACK, IT'S AMAZING HOW MUCH SAFETY THEY PROVIDE FOR OUR COUNTY ENGINEER CAME UP WITH THIS PROGRAM.
[01:00:08]
WE JUST HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE COORDINATE AND AS DEVELOPMENT COME IN, IF THEY HAVE IMPROVEMENTS COMING OUR WAY, MAKE SURE WE ARE NOT DOING SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO BE REPLACED IN THE NEAR FUTURE. DND LS, IF YOU REMEMBER TEN YEARS AGO, THIS WAS A HIGH FLIER TYPE OF PROJECT WE ARE TALKING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. WE WANT TO KEEP AN EYE ON IT.THAT'S WHY WE KEEP $75,000 IN THERE WE NEED TO KEEP UP WITH THE CURRENT STATE OF IT. SO THAT'S WHY WE HAD TO MINIMAL DOLLARS IN THERE TO MAKE SURE WE ARE AWARE OF WHAT'S COMING OUR WAY AND HOW DO WE MAKE SURE WE ARE OUT IN FRONT OF IT.
>> TOTAL MAXIMUM? >> BASICALLY NITROGEN AND
PHOSPHORUS. >> IF THERE'S A STORM WATER -- STORMWATER ASSESSMENT, DO YOU THINK IT WOULD BE FUNDING?
>> I THINK IT WOULD BE A GREAT IDEA.
TRAFFIC COMMON CACTUS IS $100,000 THIS IS WHEN COMMUNITIES COME TO US AND ASK US TO REVIEW THEIR AREA FOR TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES. WE CONDUCT AN INTERNAL STUDY.
IF THERE IS A NEED FOR TRAFFIC CALMING, IT GOES BY THE PROCESS AND IT'S APPROVED BY THE COMMUNITY.
THESE ARE AVAILABLE TO INSTALL, SPEED BUMPS, FEEDBACK SIGNS OR ANY OTHER AREAS THAT WILL HELP REDUCE -- IT'S MOSTLY CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC. THE OTHER PLACE THAT WE PUT SOME OF THIS STUFF IN BESIDES OVER HERE ON HERITAGE IS US ONE COUNTY MENDEZ. PEOPLE WERE CUTTING THROUGH AN OLDER COMMUNITY SO WE PUT IN SPEED BUMPS.
BUT MOST OF THE TIME, ONCE THEY HEAR SPEED BUMPS -- PEOPLE WILL STILL SPEED BETWEEN THE SPEED BUMPS BUT IT'S A GOOD PROGRAM IT'S A PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE SO WE FUND IT.
>> YOU WILL ALWAYS HAVE REQUESTS AND THEY THINK IT'S THE
SOLUTION. >> RIGHT, JUST LIKE WE WERE TALKING ABOUT, PEOPLE ARE OVER GETTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND SPEED TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES NEEDED THERE. THE COUNTY WIDE UNDERDRAIN INFRASTRUCTURE. THIS IS ONE OF THE THINGS, UNDERDRAIN IS SOMETHING INSTALLED THROUGHOUT SAINT JOHNS COUNTY. IT'S JUST A WAY TO REDUCE THE GROUNDWATER TABLE AND CONSTRUCT OR IF THERE ARE IMPROVEMENTS OR REPAIRS REQUIRED TO KEEP UP WITH IT.
IT DOES IMPACT OUR ROADWAYS. IT USED TO BE A MILLION DOLLARS EACH YEAR. WE DID REDUCE THIS TO 500.
I KNOW WE HAVE SOME MOUNTAIN AIR PROJECTS HERE -- THIS IS A CONTRIBUTION FROM A DEVELOPER. I THINK WE ARE STARTING TO SEE EXPRESSWAYS AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS AND HAVE A BETTER DEFINED AREA WITH THIS FOURMAC MILLION DOLLARS.
THIS IS SOMETHING EITHER THROUGH THIS PROCESS OR EARLY NEXT YEAR, WE WOULD SAY, HEY, WE WOULD LIKE TO USE THIS ON THIS PROJECT.
>> DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT'S THE PROJECT?
>> RIGHT NOW, IT COMES INTO 16 A AND SOME OF THESE AREAS OUT THERE, SOME EXPANSION OF 16 A WOULD BE BENEFICIAL FOR THE
>> SO WE ARE LOOKING IN THAT GENERAL AREA RIGHT NOW.
PLUS IT'S PROBABLY SET UP IN THAT GENERAL AREA.
SOME PEOPLE IN THE PAST -- THAT WOULD BE CHALLENGING BUT WE CAN LOOK ALONG 16 A AND SEE IF THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE THAT WE CAN DO. OUR INTERCHANGE, WE HAVE 6 MILLION IN THE BUDGET RIGHT NOW THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE STATE. WE ARE CURRENTLY ASKING THE BOARD FOR THE SAFE RAILROAD GRANT PIERRE CHRISTIN AND HER TEAM ARE PUTTING THAT TOGETHER FOR US.
[01:05:03]
OH, MY GOD GOING ACROSS US ONE OR 210, I CAN SEE THE NEED TOEXPAND THE 210. >> WHAT IS THE GRANT.
>> THE 6 MILLION WAS A STATE APPROPRIATION.
IT WAS 24 OR 23. >> THAT IS RIGHT.
WE WERE GOING TO USE THAT TO MATCH THE RAILROAD GRANT FROM FEDERAL AND THEN THAT GRANT WAS DELAYED.
SO THAT FUNDING IS STILL THERE. >> EVEN WITH 6 MILLION WE SEE IMPROVEMENT COMING. AND THEN 210, ALL THE WAY BACK DOWN TO 16 A -- JUST REALLY WANT TO SEE HOW THE FIRST EXPRESSWAY AFFECTS IT. 210 I-95 TO E PAPI, THE 10 MILLION I THINK IS INCORRECT. THIS WOULD BE ADJUSTED FOR THE FY28. THEY ARE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT THIS FOR US AS PART OF THE 210 INTERCHANGE AND WILL IDENTIFY SOME OF THE IMPROVEMENTS AS WELL AS ANY LAND ACQUISITION NECESSARY. I THINK IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE A MILLION DOLLARS FOR NEXT YEAR SO WE WOULD HAVE THE ABILITY TO PURCHASE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE STUDY.
>> AND THAT IS A VERY SMALL SECTION.
>> IT'S A SECTION WE COMPLETE UP TO 210 IN FRONT OF THE TRUCK STOP AREA. THEY WILL PROBABLY TAKE ANOTHER FULL 12 MONTHS TO COMPLETE THE EVALUATING.
>> I PUT A TWIST ON IT. THAT ONE IS DONE.
>> THAT IS PROBABLY A FUTURE PHASE, EXPANDING IT FURTHER.
>> THERE HAVE BEEN SOME PRELIMINARY TALKS THAT WE ARE SET UP FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS. WE'VE GOT THE 208.
WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT REDECKING.
IT'S OUT THERE. IT'S STILL ON OUR MIND.
22094 LANE TO SIX. THIS IS THE 210 NORTH TO THE 9B CONNECTION. AS WE GO THROUGH THE 210 AND 22 '09 INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS -- THE DESIGN FOR THOSE PROJECTS.
THIS IS IMPACT FEES IDENTIFIED FOR THESE IMPROVEMENTS.
IMPACT FEES PROBABLY WON'T BE THERE.
IT'S GOING TO BE CHALLENGING TO HAVE THIS FUNDED THROUGH IMPACT FEES. AND THEN WE HAVE OUR CURRENT 220-9210 INTERSECTION WE ARE GOING THROUGH.
PROGRAM $15 MILLION NEXT YEAR. THIS IS SOMETHING THAT I NEED TO SIT DOWN, 15 MILLION CACTUS IS TF DOLLARS IDENTIFIED FOR THE CURRENT COST ESTIMATE IS ABOUT 17 MILLION AND THERE ARE OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING TO PUSH THIS PROJECT UP BECAUSE I THINK THIS IS A HIGHER PRIORITY FOR THIS PROJECT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE CAN BUILD IT. BUT THIS IS A ZERO ON THE SCALE.
I THINK THIS IS OUR NUMBER 1 PRIORITY AND EXPECTATION.
DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITE. DEBRIS MANAGEMENT SITES, SOMETHING THAT SCARES ME ALL THE TIME, MAKING SURE WE CAN TAKE OUR DEBRIS TO A LOCATION. IT SEEMS THAT WE ARE GETTING TIGHTER AND TIGHTER AS WE GO ALONG.
BEING ABLE TO SECURE SOME PROPERTY, EVEN 10 ACRES, WE TALKED ABOUT 6 ACRES OFF OF VETERANS.
I'M ALWAYS WORRIED ABOUT BLOCKING STUFF DOWN.
THAT'S WHY WE HAVE IT HERE. IT'S NOT A MAJOR PRIORITY BUT
[01:10:01]
IT'S SOMETHING FOR US THAT WHEN WE NEED IT, WE NEED IT IN A BAD WAY. THEN WE HAVE DORADO DRIVE DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. THIS IS THE STUDY FOR NEXT YEAR.THIS IS WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT LOOKING AT THE MSP USE FOR A DRAINAGE AREA. EVEN -- THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE TRY TO WORK WITH MATTHEW AND SEE IF THERE WAS ANY RESILIENCY OR ANY GRANT DOLLARS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT A PROJECT LIKE THIS.
AND I THINK ALL OF OUR DRAINAGE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN DELIVERED.
>> ANY PRIORITY ON THIS? >> REALLY I PUT IT IN AS A
BRIDGE. >> WE WANT TO EVALUATE PROJECT FEASIBILITY CHARACTER THEY ALSO EVALUATE FINANCING OPTIONS.
>> YES. WE SIT DOWN WITH THEM TO DO THE CRITERIA ABOUT PROJECTS AND WHAT SHOULD WE SPEND ON.
>> IT MAY BE NOT BE A BAD IDEA IF THEY ARE LOOKING AT THE FEASIBILITY STUDY, IF THEY CAN ESTABLISH PARAMETERS BECAUSE THEY ARE ALREADY IN THE STUDY AREA AND THEY CAN MAKE THE RECOMMENDATION BECAUSE IT IS AN ISOLATED BENEFIT.
>> FISH ISLAND OUTFALL, THIS IS A PHASE TWO PROJECT.
RIGHT NOW, THE FUNCTION IS VERY LOW.
THIS SEEMS TO BE CHALLENGING WITH LAND ACQUISITION.
THIS IS THE $2 MILLION THAT WE RECOMMEND FOR THE PROCESS THAT WE WOULD DIVERT OVER BACK TO 22 '09 OR 210 NEXT YEAR.
MOVE THIS A COUPLE YEARS OUT AS WE GET INTO THE PROCESS.
AS WELL AS CONTINUE TO LOOK TO SEE IF THERE'S ANY RESILIENCY DOLLARS FOR IT AS PART OF THE PROCESS.
4-MILE ROAD SIDEWALK, THAT'S PROBABLY A DUPLICATE GREENBRIER
WIDENING. >> WE DID FUND IT 15 MILLION -- WE FALL UNDER THE SAME CONTRACT THEY REIMBURSE US FOR ALL OF THE
IMPROVEMENTS OUT THERE. >> THEIR FUNDING WILL FLOW
THROUGH US. >> THEY KIND OF DELAY PROJECTS.
THEY REALLY WANTED IT TO GO TO US BECAUSE IT'S A LOT EASIER FOR THEM. BUDGETING MAINTENANCE, WE ARE LOOKING AT 2 MILLION ANNUALLY RIGHT NOW TO SEE IF WE WILL GET GRANT FUNDING FOR THE MAINTENANCE.
HASTINGS PEDESTRIAN MOBILITY AND ADA IMPROVEMENTS -- THAT'S FUTURE DOLLARS. SHOULD BE REALLOCATED TO OTHER
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS. >> AND THAT'S NOT NEEDED?
>> THERE ARE IMPROVEMENTS AND THERE'S OTHER TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENTS THAT FAR OUTWEIGHS. >> THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT
THEY COULD POTENTIALLY -- >> ABSOLUTELY.
AND THEN HOLMES BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT CACTUS IS A PLANNING PHASE RIGHT NOW BECAUSE WE UNDERSTAND THE DOT WILL PROBABLY -- WE NEED TO START LOOKING AT WHAT IMPROVEMENTS COULD BE MADE
[01:15:02]
BETWEEN 312 AND 4-MILE INTERSECTION TO START TO SET THE CITY FOR HOW MUCH THE IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE, WHAT KIND OF LAND ACQUISITION WOULD BE REQUIRED.WE NEED TO COME UP WITH AN ALTERNATE TO DO LANES FOR THAT SEGMENT. WITH THE INTENT THAT WE ARE SETTING UP TO GET THE MONEY FROM THE DOT WHERE THEY CAN OFFSET COST AND ADD THAT INTO COUNTY IMPROVEMENTS BECAUSE IT'S A LOT CHEAPER FOR HOLMES BOULEVARD THAN 312 WHICH IS BASICALLY A BRIDGE. IN ROAD IMPROVEMENTS IS A FUTURE PROJECT. KING'S ESTATE ROAD CORRIDOR CACTUSES WERE CURRENTLY ACQUIRING PROPERTY, PHASE ONE IS STARTING CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW. IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
THE $10 MILLION PROVIDES PHASE TWO CONSTRUCTION AS WELL AS CONTINUED LAND ACQUISITION. WE HAVE A TOTAL OF FIVE PHASES FOR KING'S ESTATE. THIS IS FROM WEST TO EAST.
THIS WILL BE PHASE TWO LAND ACQUISITION FOR LEE ROAD IS A FUTURE ONE LEMASTER IS ANOTHER ONE THAT IS THE CURRENT LOCATION IS ABSOLUTELY DESTROYED. THIS IS THE REPLACEMENT OF IT.
IT'S MORE ESTHETICS, TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH.
THERE MAY BE OTHER NEEDS OR ESTHETICS BUT THIS IS ANOTHER ONE THAT WE WOULD IDENTIFY AS A POSSIBLE RELOCATION.
ANOTHER TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT.
>> FOR THIS ONE IN PARTICULAR, IS IT RELATED TO TEAR DOWN AND REBUILD OF HOLMES? IS IT ALL RELATED TO THAT OR IS
IT JUST -- >> I THINK IT'S JUST THE AGE, TO TELL YOU THE TRUTH. I WISH IT WAS SOMETHING LIKE THAT THAT WE COULD PUT BACK ON SOMEONE ELSE BUT WE WILL TAKE A LOOK AT THAT. BUT I THINK IT'S PRETTY BEAT UP.
LONGLEAF PINE PARKWAY, ANOTHER SIGNAL.
ROAD DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION IN 28.
>> THIS IS THE WIDENING. >> MIRANDA ROAD BRIDGE CACTUS IS ANOTHER ONE, $400,000 TO LOOK AT.
MAJOR IMPROVEMENTS BUT WE ARE GOING TO TALK ABOUT DECOMMISSIONING THIS MAKING IT A PEDESTRIAN ALLEY AND TRYING TO REDUCE THE COST. THAT WILL TAKE A LOT OF INPUT FROM THE COMMUNITY. IT IS NOT A CRITICAL ROADWAY.
THERE'S A POSSIBILITY OF US IT TO PEDESTRIAN ZONE.
>> THE -- THE 2.4. >> WE HAVE TO DO SOME MAJOR REPAIR. NOT A TOTAL REBUILD BUT.
>> WHERE IS THAT? >> THIS IS IN PINE BEACH BETWEEN SAN JUAN DRIVE AND A ONE KIND OF A MAJOR BOULEVARD.
>> THE IMPACT FEE, ARE WE ADDING.
>> WE WILL ADD CAPACITY. YOU MAY RECALL THIS CACTUS AS ONE WE WERE LOOKING FOR A GRANT OPPORTUNITY AND THIS THERE'S STILL A LOT OF QUESTIONS OF THE BENEFIT OF SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
>> THERE IS STRONG COMMUNITY OPPOSITION ON THIS ONE.
>> BECAUSE THERE WOULD BE A LOT OF ACQUISITION OF LAND.
NORTH ROSCOE IS ANOTHER ONE THAT WE COULD SAY WE ARE GOING TO PUSH TO A DIFFERENT PROJECT. THIS IS $3 MILLION THAT REALLY WE SHOULD ONLY SEEK FREEING OPPORTUNITIES FOR THIS.
>> THE RESIDENT DOESN'T WANT IT. >> THE RESIDENTS DON'T WANT IT THIS DOES FLOOD. SO WE NEED TO KEEP AN EYE ON IT.
THE COMMUNITY STILL HASN'T ACCEPTED IT.
>> THAT MAY BE A MSBU PROJECT BECAUSE IT'S A LOCALIZED BENEFIT AND REQUIRES HEAVY INPUT WHEN THEY DO, THERE IS A MECHANISM IN
[01:20:10]
PLACE. NPDES, THAT IS OUR PERMITTING.>> NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM.
IT JUST KEEPS OUR PERMITS IN GOOD STANDING.
OYSTER CREEK DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.
THAT IS $7 MILLION. >> IS THAT AN OLD COMMUNITY THAT
DOESN'T HAVE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS? >> THAT IS THROUGH WEST AUGUSTINE. IT'S GOT SOME AREAS IMPACTED THROUGH IT BUT WE'VE DONE SOME LOCALIZED --
>> IS THAT THE ONE WE APPLIED FOR A GRANT?
>> WE DID GET A GRANT FOR SOME IMPROVEMENTS OUT THERE.
WE BUILD A POND. ROAD AND 208, THIS IS A SECTION PICKING UP IN TRAFFIC AND A SIGNAL WARRANT SHOWS THERE'S A NEED FOR A SIGNAL APP THERE. THAT'S WHAT THIS IS FOR.
PALM VALLEY MULTIUSE PATH CACTUS TRYING TO GET DOLLARS FROM THE STATE AND OTHER AREAS. THIS IS WHAT IT WOULD COST.
>> THAT WAS WHEN REP STEPHENSON WAS STUDYING THAT.
>> PALM VALLEY ROAD SIDEWALK, WE COULD PROBABLY TAKE THIS OFF FOR FUTURE. THE FOLDING OF PALM VALLEY ROAD TO MICKLER TO THE A ONE A INTERSECTION IS A GREAT PROJECT.
IT WILL BENEFIT THE AREA. I WOULD NEVER GET RID OF IT BECAUSE IT COULD HELP THE AREA BUT IT IS IN FUTURE YEARS.
AND THE SAME WITH THE ROSCOE TO MICKLER, A BUNCH OF PROJECTS
THERE. >> WHAT ABOUT THE PALM VALLEY
ROUNDABOUT. >> THAT IS IN HERE.
THAT IS FUNDED THIS YEAR. 3.2 MILLION.
OUR EXPECTATION IS THAT LITTLE BIT OUT IN THE NEXT THREE OR FOUR MONTHS. THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT, WE HAVE $13 MILLION A YEAR AND THAT IS STEADY ON THAT ONE.
WE ARE KEEPING AN EYE ON THE COST OF ASPHALT TO SEE WHAT IT DOES TO THE PROJECT AND HOW MUCH IT IMPACTS US HERE RIGHT NOW WE HAVE A CONTRACT SO IT CAN'T BE TOO MUCH.
$13 MILLION BUT LET'S KEEP AN EYE ON THE PAVEMENT CONDITION INDEX WHICH IS A VERY GOOD STANDARD.
>> WHO IS THE CONTRACTOR? >> WE HAVE MULTIPLE.
IT DEPENDS. WE HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF TREATMENT. A ONE A IS FUTURE YEARS.
OUR HEAVY EQUIPMENT, WE PROGRAMED IT OUT UNDER THE FIVE YEAR WORK PROGRAM TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ARE KEEPING UP AND WE DON'T CRUSH OUR BUDGET IN ANY ONE GIVEN YEAR.
PUBLIC WORKS IS IN GOOD STANDING.
PUBLIC WORKS WAREHOUSE, WE HAVE $500,000 IN THERE.
LOOKING AT TREATING THE WAREHOUSE AT PUBLIC WORKS, THE CENTRAL RECEIVING OFFICE FOR PUBLIC WORKS, ESPECIALLY WITH OUR SYSTEM IN PLACE, CHECKS AND BALANCES OF THINGS COMING IN AND COMING OUT BUT ALSO GOING TO THE POINT WITH THE SYSTEM, UTILITY HAS THAT WORK. AND IT GIVES MORE ACCOUNTABILITY AS THINGS ARE COMING THROUGH AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR.
RACETRACK AND DO S ONE IS SOMETHING WE CAN LOOK AT GETTING RID OF. THEY HAVE SOME IDEAS.
[01:25:20]
ROADWAY LIGHTING CACTUS IS ANOTHER AREA WE ARE TRYING TO CENTRALIZE ROADWAY LIGHTING WHICH IS A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT.THIS PROBABLY COULD FALL UNDER SAFETY BUT TARGETED AS A ONE YEAR PROJECT. IS NOT A FULL PROGRAM BECAUSE I THINK WE HAVE THREE ROUNDABOUTS THAT WE WANT TO INSTALL AT.
IF YOU'VE DRIVEN THERE, YOU SEE CARS DRIVING THROUGH IT WITH LIGHTING, WE HOPE TO REDUCE THAT.
>> SO THIS IS STREET LIGHTS. >> THESE ARE STREET LIGHTS.
AT A VERY CENTRALIZED LOCATION. THE NEXT ONES ARE ROBERTS ROAD, FUTURE, FUTURE THAT ONE IS ABOUT TO START.
WE'LL LOOK AT THE $2 MILLION BUT I DON'T KNOW IF WE NEED THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE GRANT AND WE ARE UNDER CONSTRUCTION RIGHT NOW WE ARE CURRENTLY MOVING ON THAT PROJECT.
SANTA ROSA IS AN AREA THAT WE RECEIVED A GRANT IN THE PREVIOUS COUPLE OF YEARS BUT THIS TIME $500,000 WOULD LET US FINISH OFF THE NEXT PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. SHAW BOULEVARD SIDEWALK THERE IS AN AREA THAT THERE IS A GAP IN THE SIDEWALK DOWN THERE.
THIS IS A THREE. SAINT JOHN'S PARKWAY, WE ARE LOOKING TO ADD DOLLARS INTO OUR 20092010 PROJECTS.
I PUT THIS AS A THREE AND THEN WE CAN GET THROUGH TO THE WEST KING STREET PIER THERE IS AN ALL SET DOWN THERE, A LOT OF THAT COMING BACK TO THE BOARD WE HAD THE DOT SINCE GOS1.
THEY ARE GOING TO CONDUCT THE ANALYSIS, THE INTERSECTION CONTROL EVALUATION AND PROVIDE US THE AREA.
>> I PUT IT AS A TWO FOR NEXT YEAR.
>> THE FACILITY IMPROVEMENT, WE ALSO HAVE TILMAN RIDGE AND SCALEHOUSE IMPROVEMENTS. THE MILLION DOLLARS FROM THE TILMAN PROJECT LOCATED AT 431 -- 432.
STRATTON IS THE HIGHEST VOLUME TRANSFER STATION.
TILMAN IS WORKING FINE FOR THE TIME.
WE CAN DEFER SOME OF THOSE IMPROVEMENTS.
IF WE CAN REDUCE THAT FROM 1.8 MILLION, I THINK THE RECOMMENDATION MAY BE ZERO NEXT YEAR BECAUSE WE HAVE DOLLARS THIS FISCAL YEAR FOR REPAIRS. THEY COULD START PAYING BACK THE FUND A LITTLE BIT MORE AND A LITTLE MORE SAVINGS.
OUR GOAL IS TO TRY TO PAY THAT BACK AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN.
IN OUR BUDGET, WE ARE LOOKING AT $1 MILLION A YEAR BUT 28 YEARS -- WE HAVE A PROGRAM TO PAY IT BACK BUT OUR GOAL IS TO TRY AND PAY IT BACK AS QUICKLY AS WE CAN AND REDUCE OUR FEES.
>> THANK YOU. >> THE FIRST ONE THERE, THROUGH
[01:30:40]
SENATE BILL 64, THIS IS SOMETHING WE HAVE TO DO IS COMPLY BY 2032. THAT'S A REQUIREMENT, ALL OF THE MONEY YOU SEE IN THE ENTERPRISE FUND THAT CARRIES OVER, IT GOES UP ON INFLATIONARY DOLLARS. THESE ARE ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM. WE HAVE MONIES THROUGH OUR OPERATIONAL BUDGETS THROUGH THE CIP BECAUSE THE CIP PROJECTS DO MANAGE ANY MAINTENANCE THAT COMES THROUGH THE ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM BUT THEY ARE CAPITAL DOLLARS.THE 214 WATER TREATMENT PLANT, THAT IS THE FIRST PROJECT, THE 6 MILLION CALLED THE RELIABILITY PROJECT.
WE ONLY HAVE -- EACH PRODUCES ABOUT 2 MILLION GALLONS.
THEY ARE KIND OF REDUNDANT. NO LONGER ANY MORE.
THE SECOND SKED IS ON HALF THE TIME.
WE ARE DEFINITELY PUTTING ANOTHER ONE THERE WITH $6 MILLION PER YEAR SO THAT'S AN ADDITIONAL SKED.
THE GOOD NEWS IS WHEN WE BUILT IT, WE HAD ROOM FOR IT.
THAT'S WHY IT'S A MINIMAL PROJECT OTHERWISE THAT WOULD NOT BE A $6 MILLION PROJECT FOR THE WELL FIELD IS WHAT SUPPORTS THE WATER PLANT. THIS IS WHERE WE DRAW WATER FROM. THE ENTERPRISE VERSION WHAT YOU SEE THERE, THE 236 AND SO FORTH, WE HAVE A CERTIFICATION PROGRAM WHERE WE GO TO THESE WELLS AND IT'S A GREAT PROGRAM THAT MANAGES AND MAINTAINS THE LIFE OF THOSE WELLS AND ALLOWS BETTER EFFICIENCY. THE $2.8 MILLION YOU SEE IS FOR ONE WELL. THAT IS A NEEDED ONE.
ONE OF THE THINGS YOU WILL SEE THROUGHOUT THIS PROGRAM TODAY INCLUDING 14 NORTHWEST AND OTHER WELL FIELDS, ANYWHERE WE HAVE A WELL FIELD WE ARE GOING TO PUT MORE WELLS FOR REDUNDANCY, THE DISTRICT CAME TO US A YEAR AND A HALF OR THREE YEARS BACK AND SAID THAT THE DRAW ON THESE AQUIFERS HAS BEEN SLIGHTLY MINIMIZED AND ALLOWS US TO PUMP LESS ON EACH WELL AND PROVIDE MORE WELLS. SO IT'S MORE A REDUNDANT KIND OF A PLANNED PROGRAM TO PROTECT THE ESSENCE OF OUR AQUIFER.
THE ENGINEERING STUDIES IS A PROGRAM THAT WE HAVE FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS, THE ENGINEERING STUDIES YEAR OF THE, WE'VE HAD MANY OF THESE STUDIES IN THE LAST TWO YEARS THAT'S WHY WE SEE A NUMBER OF 900,000 BUT THAT WILL SUPPORT -- IT PROVIDES MASTER PLANS FOR VARIOUS COMMUNITIES, NORTH BEACH, HASTINGS, THOSE WOULD ALSO BE COVERED.
IT ALSO PROVIDES MODELING EFFORTS.
FOR EXAMPLE, WE INTRODUCED THE FIRE SERVICE PROGRAM.
WE WOULD BE ADDING A LOT OF MODELING TOWARD THAT PROGRAM.
IT SUPPORTS THAT, IT ENTAILS THE 900.
HISTORICALLY WE'VE HAD CHALLENGES TO COMPLETING ALL THE MONEY THERE BUT I THINK WE WERE REALLY GOOD LAST YEAR IN COMPLETELY ENTERPRISING AND ENCUMBERING ALL OF THOSE FUNDS.
WE ANTICIPATE EVERY FUND WE ENCUMBERED LAST YEAR, FROM LAST YEAR AND THAT CARRIES THROUGH, THIS IS A CATEGORY THAT WE NEED REALLY WELL. THIS IS WHERE MOST OF OUR STUDIES GO. FOR EXAMPLE, BIOSOLIDS COMES IN.
WE HAD A STUDY, AT SOME OF GREG'S PROGRAMS, YOU NEED THAT MONEY BUT YOU DON'T KNOW WHEN YOU NEED IT SO YOU KIND OF MANAGE IT YEAR BY YEAR BUT WE ANTICIPATE THAT AMOUNT AND NEEDED THROUGHOUT THE FIVE YE YEARS.
FORCE MAINS. THESE ARE MAINS THAT PUMP OUR SEWAGE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. THE BIG ONE YOU SEE THERE IS A 214 PROJECT THAT WE NEED REALLY BAD THAT CONVERGED SOME OF OUR WATER MAINS. WE HAVE AN OLD WATER MAIN THAT WE ARE TRYING TO CONVERT TO A SEWER FORCE MAIN.
[01:35:02]
THAT COMPENSATES THAT PROJECT. OTHER THAN THAT, IT'S AN ONGOING PROJECT THROUGHOUT OUR UTILITY SERVICE AREA.I CAN GO THROUGH THE DETAILS FOR EACH ONE OF THEM BUT IT KIND OF COVERS MOST OF IT. GIS, WE PROVIDE A LOT OF STUDIES THERE. A LOT OF THE MONEY GOES INTO DASHBOARDS AND PROVIDING TECHNOLOGY, INDOOR SYSTEMS AND ALSO PROVIDES SOME ENTERPRISE FUND DOLLARS FOR SUPPORTING OUR LICENSEES AND SO FORTH. THAT'S AN ONGOING THING THAT WE HAVE BEEN CONSISTENT, UTILIZING 400 EACH YEAR IN OUR GIS AND I KNOW I'M NOT TRYING TO GIVE YOU NUMBERS HERE 123, MOST OF THESE ARE ESSENTIAL SERVICES THAT ARE ALL HAVING A FUNDING SOURCE.
I WANT TO STOP THERE FOR A MINUTE TO SAY THERE IS THREE OF THEM. ONE IS OUR RESERVES WHICH IS THE RETAIL VOLUME WE GET FROM USUALLY ABOUT 20, 30 MILLION.
WE HAVE THE CONNECTED FEED AND THEN WE HAVE TIME TO TIME BOND DOLLARS. A LOT OF THESE PROJECTS ARE ABOUT $300 MILLION BOND IN THE BOARD FOR THE NEXT FEW YEARS.
27, 28 AND 29 WE'LL SEE THAT. I JUST WANT TO MAKE THAT STATEMENT. HASTINGS CACTUS IS OUR INI PROGRAM. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT.
IT'S SORT OF AN RNR PROGRAM. INFILTRATION IS A PROCESS WHERE WE HAVE WATER UNDERNEATH THE GROUNDWATER THAT INFILTRATES INTO OUR GRAVITY SYSTEM AND INFLOW IS SOMETHING THAT COMES WHEN COMMUNITIES GET FLOODED, THAT WATER GOES INTO THE SEWER SYSTEM, AND WE DON'T WANT THAT TO OCCUR.
SO WE HAVE A PROGRAM THAT MANAGES MAKING SURE, THESE ARE THE SMOKE TEST THAT YOU MAY HAVE HEARD.
WE MANAGE THIS PROGRAM TO AVOID INFILTRATION AND INFLOW TO MAXIMIZE EFFICIENCY. OTHERWISE THEY WILL GET INUNDATED WITH RAINWATER OR GROUNDWATER AND TAKE AWAY A LOT OF OUR CAPACITY THAT'S A PROGRAM.
I SERIOUSLY FEEL IT'S NOT ENOUGH MONEY BUT IT'S ONE AREA WE TRY TO DIAL DOWN COMPARED TO THE OTHER AREAS THAT WE NEED MONEY.
AND THIS IS SOME STATEMENT I MADE IN THE BUDGET ABOUT WE TYPICALLY TRY TO USE 10% OF OUR DOLLARS WE ARE ABOUT 6% SLOWLY RAMPING UP TO EIGHT. BUT THOSE ARE THE DIAL TONES WE DIAL DOWN TO MANAGE THE NEEDS OF OUR PROGRAM YEAR BY YEAR.
SO THAT IS A CONSTANT ONE, 2 MILLION NEED IN THAT PROGRAM INLET BEACH, IT'S A WATER PLANT. THE DOLLARS YOU SEE IN THE FIRST CACTUS 65 CACTI 67 ARE THE ASSET MANAGEMENT DOLLARS IDENTIFIED EACH YEAR TO MANAGE THE ASSETS. THE $4 MILLION IS A BOOSTER TANK. WE FEEL WE NEED THAT.
THE BOOSTER TANKS ARE TYPICALLY TO STORE WATER AND PROVIDE IT WHEN IT'S REALLY NEEDED, ESPECIALLY FIRE FLOWS.
IT ALSO HELPS INCREASE THE LEVER OF SERVICE TO OUR CUSTOMERS.
BOOSTER TANKS ARE A BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY AND WE HAVE IDENTIFIED IT THROUGH AN ENGINEERING STUDY THAT WE NEED ONE THERAPEUTIC LIFT STATIONS, AGAIN THAT IS AN AREA, THAT'S WHY WE HAVE A SEPARATE CATEGORY FOR LIFT STATIONS.
ALL OF THOSE DOLLARS ARE BACKING ON DOLLARS.
WE HAVE MORE THAN 500 BOOTH STATIONS -- 500 LIFT STATIONS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. THIS IS THROUGH OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM WHERE WE MAKE SURE THAT LIFT STATIONS ARE EITHER REHABBED OR IN SOME CASES REVAMPED FOR CAPACITY PURPOSES.
SO THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE AVERAGE, FOUL TO 6 MILLION A YEAR. THAT'S ALSO A PROGRAM THAT WE COULD USE A LOT MORE BUT WE MANAGE IT.
I WOULD SAY EARLY 2015 TO 2020, WE PUT A LOT OF DOLLARS THAT HAS REDUCED THE NEED THERE. IT'S A GREAT JOB BY STAFF ON HOW WE MANAGE THAT PROGRAM. WE HAVE FOUR OR 500 LIFT STATIONS SO IT'S ALWAYS IN NEED. MARSH LANDING WATER PLANT.
WE DON'T HAVE ANY PARTICULAR NEED THERE OTHER THAN ASSET MANAGEMENT PART OF IT THAT IS ALWAYS NEEDED YEAR TO YEAR.
THAT'S ONE THING I WANT TO MENTION ABOUT THE ASSET MANAGEMENT. SIMILAR TO WHAT GREG DOES IN PUBLIC WORKS. IT'S A GREAT WAY TO MANAGE OUR ASSETS THAT WE DON'T HAVE A HIGHER ONE YEAR.
IT'S A VERY RUDIMENTARY PAUSE ON WHAT WE FEEL MANAGES DOLLARS THROUGHOUT THE PROGRAM FOR US. THE WASTEWATER PLANT, THAT IS PART OF OUR SENATE BILL $64, THE $16 MILLION YOU SEE, THAT'S
[01:40:04]
WASTEWATER FACILITY THAT HAS TO BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE 64 STANDARD SPIRIT THAT IS A PART -- I'M NOT SURE IF THAT'S A BOND PROJECT BUT IT WILL BE POSSIBLY THE 2028 BOND FOR THAT THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD PER METER CHANGE OUT, I THINK WE MENTIONED THIS IN OUR BUDGET HEARINGS. THERE ARE TWO PARTS OF IT.WE REPLACED ABOUT ONE AND A HALF MILLION A YEAR IN OUR METERS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY. METERS USUALLY LAST TEN TO 15 YEARS. IF YOU PUT THEM BEYOND THOSE 15 YEARS THEY DON'T READ WELL AND THAT IS A BIG LOSS OF REVENUE FOR US. YOU START GETTING BELOW THAT 90% AND SO IT'S A GREAT RETURN OF INVESTMENTS FOR US, THE REMAINDER OF THE 2.6 FROM THE ONE AND A HALF ARE THE TOWERS THAT WE ESTABLISHED FOR OUR AMR WHICH IS THE AUTOMATED READING SYSTEM. ALL OF OUR METERS ARE AUTOMATED.
THEY GET SIGNALS FROM THESE TOWERS AND SO THEY ARE AGED AND THEY NEED TO BE REPLACED SO THAT COVERS THOSE TWO.
NORTH BEACH UTILITIES, THAT IS I WILL HAVE TO LOOK TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT THAT IS. WE HAVE A CONCENTRATE MAIN.
WE ARE TRYING TO TAKE OUT THE CONCENTRATE FROM OUR -- DELIVERING IT TO THE INTERCOASTAL.
IT'S A SPECIFIC PROJECT. THAT'S 1.9, TWO AND A HALF BILLION INCLUDING THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF IT.
ANOTHER IS THE AERATOR DECK WHICH IS PART OF OUR WASTEWATER FACILITY THAT'S ALSO GETTING UPGRADED.
WE THINK THAT PROJECT -- AND THE LAST ONE IS THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT WHICH IS ABOUT $2 MILLION FOR THE WATER TREATMENT PLANT FOR THAT. THAT'S A TOTAL OF 8.4.
NORTHWEST WELLFIELD. IT COVERS MORE OF THE NORTHWEST GROWING COMMUNITY. THE $10 MILLION WORTH OF PROCEEDS YOU SEE IS FOR THE 12 WELLS, 11 AND 12 THOSE ARE COMING FROM THE DEBT PROCEEDS AND THE 6 MILLION IS ALSO FOR ADDITIONAL WELLS. I THINK WE ARE ADDING FOURMAC WELLS TO THE SYSTEM. THE ONGOING DOLLARS YOU SEE FOR THE 107, 111 ARE FOR THE ASSET MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.
WE ARE UTILIZING OUR IMPACT FEE DOLLARS THERE INCLUDING ON THE PROCEEDS PRESENTED TO THE BOARD ON THAT.
NORTHWEST WASTEWATER FACILITY. THIS IS OUR BIGGEST PROJECT.
THE BIGGEST AMOUNT, THE EXPANSION, WE ARE WATCHING OUR CAPACITY VERY WELL, NOT JUST RENTING THE EXPANDING FACILITIES. IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE WORKED WITH BUDGET FOR A LONG TIME AND WE ARE TRYING TO PUT WHAT WE CAN. IT'S VERY CHALLENGING TO NOT DOUBLE WASTEWATER FACILITY. THIS IS A 3.7 MILLION-GALLON PER DAY FACILITY IN THE NORTHWEST. THE IDEAL THING WOULD BE SEVEN AND A HALF BUT WE'RE TRYING TO SEE IF WE CAN PUT IT AROUND 6 MILLION. OTHERWISE THIS WOULD BE 130, $140 MILLION. THE MAJORITY OF THE DOLLARS THERE YOU ARE SEEING FOR THAT. OTHER THAN THAT, THE 107 YOU SEE IS FOR THE ASSET MANAGEMENT PART OF THE PROGRAM.
NORTHWEST WATER PLANT, THIS IS GOING TO BE OUR EXISTING WATER PLANT. LET ME TAKE THAT BACK.
THIS IS A NEW WATER PLANT. IT IS -- THAT'S THE 43 MILLION YOU SEE FOR THAT INCLUDING THE WELL AT THE WATER PLANT.
THERE IS A NEW PLANT FOR THE NORTHWEST FACILITY AND THIS IS ONE OF OUR PROJECTS, IT'S NEEDED TO BE ONLINE BY MID 2029 CALCULATED BY 2030 TO MAKE SURE WE MAINTAIN LEVELS OF SERVICE.
THAT IS A PROJECT THAT WE JUST WE JUST PUT AN RFQ FOR SO WE ARE HOPING TO NAIL THAT BEFORE OCTOBER 1 AND START THAT PROJECT THE PLANTATION WATER PLANT IS PART OF OUR ASSET MANAGEMENT DOLLARS. I EXPLAINED THAT EARLIER.
SAME THING WITH THE WASTEWATER FACILITY.
IT IS ALSO A MAJOR WASTEWATER FACILITY THAT WE RECENTLY PUT IN
[01:45:07]
ABOUT FIVE, SIX YEARS BACK. THESE ARE MAINS THAT PROVIDE RECLAIMED WATER. THE BIGGEST PROJECT HERE, I'D HAVE TO LOOK AT THE DETAIL. I WILL HAVE TO GET BACK ON THAT BECAUSE IT IS KIND OF COMBINED AND I'M FORGETTING WHAT THAT PROJECT IS BECAUSE YOU COMBINED IT AND I HAVE IT AS A LINE ITEM.I CAN COME BACK. IT IS A DEBT PROJECT.
I THINK IT SHOULD BE A PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD PROJECT THAT WE RECOGNIZE. THE SAWGRASS FACILITY, THIS IS SOMETHING WE ARE GOING TO COME BACK TO YOU IN A SEPARATE MEETING. THAT WAS AN OLD FACILITY THAT WE DECOMMISSIONED BUT WE HAVE A WATER PLANT THERE AND WASTEWATER. AND THAT PROJECT, A GREAT JOB CLEANING THAT THING UP. THIS IS WHERE THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE IS GOING TO PUT A SATELLITE FACILITY.
WE HAVE AN INTEREST OF PUTTING SOME WAREHOUSES.
IT'S VERY CENTRALIZED AND ALL YOU NEED FOR THE PROJECT IS FOR THE FUTURE BUT WE WANT TO WORK WITH THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND WORK WITH ADMIN ON THAT I KNOW OUR DOLLARS ARE IN THE FUTURE YEARS BUT WE CAN WORK WITH YOU ON THAT.
THE SAWGRASS WATER TREATMENT PLANT IS ASSET MANAGEMENT DOLLARS. IT'S PRETTY MUCH ASSET MANAGEMENT WITH THE EXCEPTION OF 2.5.
THAT'S THE PLANT UPGRADE TO BRING IT TO A HIGHER CAPACITY BY PUTTING SOME DISINFECTION IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL ALLOW US TO QUALIFY FOR A BIGGER FACILITY, IT'S THE BEST WAY TO -- IT'S THE LOWEST AMOUNT OF DOLLARS WE ARE PUTTING IN TO INCREASE THE CAPACITY THESE DAYS.
STAFF FOUND A WAY TO DO THAT. THAT WILL BE A HUGE UPGRADE FOR US THAT FACILITY. OTHER THAN THAT, THOSE ARE ASSET MANAGEMENT DOLLARS. THE 640 YOU SEE IS THE DESIGN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE 2.5 MILLION.
29 IS DESIGNED, 30 IS CONSTRUCTION.
207 WASTEWATER FACILITY CACTUS IS A BRAND NEW FACILITY WE PUT IN. THE BIGGEST PROJECT THE UTILITY AND THE COUNTY HAS DONE FOR $191 MILLION THOSE ARE TYPICAL DOLLARS THAT WE HAVE THAT WE THINK WE NEED.
I KNOW IT'S A NEWER FACILITY. I WOULD NOT NORMALLY SAY THIS BUT THIS IS ONE PROJECT THAT I COULD SAY WE MAY NOT NEED BECAUSE IT'S A BRAND NEW FACILITY.
ASSET MANAGEMENT TYPICALLY STARTS LATER ON BUT I THINK STAFF WANTS TO PUT SOME DOLLARS IN CASE SOMETHING HAPPENS.
THE 4.9 IS FOR THE MASTER, THE OLD 207 PLAN WHICH WILL HELP TO ALLOW US TO PROVIDE MORE CAPACITY FOR THE SOUTHERN SIDE OF OUR AREA. THE TELEMETRY FUND IS SOMETHING THAT IS SORT OF OUR COUNTY WIDE FUND FOR MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE THE BEST EFFICIENCY THROUGH THE SYSTEM.
THOSE ARE OUR AUTOMATION DOLLARS THAT MAKE US SMARTER, FASTER AS A UTILITY. THAT'S WHAT WE'VE BEEN UTILIZING AND AVERAGING. THE WATER BOOSTER STATIONS, THIS IS THE $18 MILLION, LET ME SEE, THERE ARE SO MANY PROJECTS, THAT IS THE $18 MILLION IS A PIPELINE.
LET ME TAKE THAT BACK, IT IS A BLENDING STATION AT 214.
ONE OF THE THINGS WE ARE DOING, WE ARE TRANSFERRING WHAT WE CALL THE CHEAPER WATER FROM THE NORTHWEST TO THE SOUTHERN AREAS, RATHER THAN UPGRADING OUR WATER PLANTS WHICH IS THE 214, IT WOULD BE MUCH MORE EXPENSIVE. THAT'S A REVERSE OSMOSIS SYSTEM COMPARED TO THIS THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW US TO TRANSFER THREE AND A HALF 4 MILLION GALLONS OF WATER FROM THE NORTHWEST THAT WE FEEL IT'S MORE EFFICIENT IN THAT SYSTEM.
THE OTHER TWO BIG NUMBERS YOU SEE, THE 2.2 AND 2.3, WE HAVE BOOSTER STATIONS THROUGHOUT THE COUNTY.
ONE IN THE SHORT AREA, ONE IN THE 16.
THOSE ARE VERY OLD SYSTEMS. THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS ARE OLD,
[01:50:04]
NOT AS AUTOMATED AS THE NEWER SYSTEMS. SO THOSE ARE VERY MUCH DUE THERE TO DO.THE WATER TRANSMISSION MAIN, WE PUT MAINS THROUGHOUT OUR SERVICE AREAS FOR REDUNDANCY AND RELIABILITY AND IN SOME CASES, NEW SERVICES. THE $24 MILLION YOU SEE IS FOR PART OF THAT OTHER PROJECT THAT I MENTIONED EARLIER THE 18 MILLION. THIS IS THE PHYSICAL WATER MAIN FROM ALONG 209 THAT WILL CONNECT NORTHWEST THROUGH THE SOUTH.
THE $18 MILLION WAS A BLENDING STATION.
WHEN YOU MIX TWO DIFFERENT KINDS OF WATERS, YOU HAVE TO HAVE A PROPORTION OF SHARE OF HOW YOU DO IT AND YOU HAVE TO BLEND IT WITH CERTAIN CHEMICALS TO MAKE SURE THE WATER THE WATER QUALITY IS SUSTAINED SO THE 18 MILLION IS THE TRANSFER.
>> SPEAKER-08: -- TRANSFER STATION, THE 24 MILLION IS THE
PIPELINES. >> THE UTILITY IMPACT FEE, THAT'S NOT PART OF OUR OVERALL IMPACT FEE? IT'S PART OF YOUR OWN RESOLUTION.
>> IT'S PART OF OUR ORDINANCE. THE STATE STATUTE REQUIREMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT LIKE IMPACT FEE IS, WE HAVE RULES FROM THE STATUTE THAT REQUIRES US TO LOOK AT IT FROM A TIME IN AND TIME OUT AND THOSE REFLECTS THE NATURE OF THE GROWTH IN THE COMMUNITY AND NEED OF PROJECTS IN THE COMMUNITY.
AND THAT'S WHY THEY ARE DIFFERENT FROM WATER AND
WASTEWATER. >> AND THAT'S THE UPDATE AS WELL, JUST LIKE OUR REGULAR IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE.
>> 100%. WAS RECENTLY DONE WHEN WE PRESENTED THE BOARD FOR THE BOND.
WE RECENTLY UPDATED. AND I BELIEVE THE BOARD IN MAY, WE HAD THE IMPACT FEES TO MAKE SURE THEY WERE CONSISTENT WITH
WHAT IS NEEDED FOR. >> ARE THOSE IMPACT FEES SUBJECT TO TRANSFERABILITY AS WELL? IN TERMS OF OUR TRANSPORTATION, THE IMPACT FEE, GETTING TRANSFERRED FOR IMPACT ZONES.
BUT THIS IS SPECIFIC. >> WE DON'T HAVE ZONES WE'VE NOT ESTABLISHED THOSE. THERE'S ONLY ONE ZONE FOR US.
THEY ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE TO -- WATER STAYS IN WATER, WASTEWATER STAYS IN WASTEWATER. RECLAIMED TENDS TO GO INTO WASTEWATER BECAUSE AS PART OF WASTEWATER BUT THEY ARE NOT TRANSFERABLE. THEY ARE RESERVED.
WE HAVE A SPECIAL RESERVE FUND FOR IMPACT FEES THAT BUDGET
KEEPS UP WITH. >> ARE THEY TRANSFERABLE FROM
DEVELOPMENT TO DEVELOPMENT? >> YES.
THEY ARE COUNTY WIDE. WE DON'T HAVE TO USE THE IMPACT FEES, THE UNIT CONNECTION FEES -- AS LONG AS THE PROJECT QUALIFIES, THE CAPACITY DRIVEN PROJECT SO SIMILAR TO GREGG'S, THEY HAVE TO PROVIDE CAPACITY TO THE SYSTEM.
THEY CANNOT BE USED FOR R AND R. SO I CANNOT RETROFIT A LIFT STATION WITH THE CONNECTION FEES.
I HAVE TO MAKE SURE WE ARE PROVIDING CAPACITY AND SERVICE.
THEY HAVE BEEN COLLECTED TO PROVIDE CAPACITY.
IT'S THEIR WAY -- >> WOULD THE DEVELOPER RECEIVE
CREDIT FOR IMPACT FEE? >> YES, THEY WILL APPEAR THE DEVELOPER QUALIFIES FOR A CREDIT.
TYPICALLY, WE REIMBURSE THEM. IF YOU TAKE A DOLLAR OFF THE UNIT CONNECTION FEE, 66% OF THAT $1.66 GOES TO TREATMENT, SAME WITH THE WATER. ANYTHING WITH WASTEWATER OR WATER TREATMENT, THE $0.33 GOES TO THE TRANSMISSION.
MOST OF THE TIME, DEVELOPERS TEND TO GET REIMBURSED IF THEY PUT A PROJECT FOR THE $0.33. THEY TYPICALLY DON'T GET REIMBURSED FOR THE TREATMENT COMPONENT, ALTHOUGH THERE ARE EXAMPLES WHERE THE DEVELOPER HAS HELPED US PROVIDE LAND FOR A WASTEWATER FACILITY AND THERE'S A PORTION OF THAT.
>> SO IT'S MORE OF A FINANCING MECHANISM TO HAVE TRANSMISSION LINES TO BE BUILT BEYOND WHAT THEY NEED.
>> WE ALSO HAVE A RATE STABILIZATION MODEL FOR HOW WE STABILIZE OUR RATES TO MAKE RATES COMPETITIVE.
I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT AMOUNT BUT IT USED TO BE ABOUT 1 MILLION EACH FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER WHEN WE PUT THAT MONEY IN OUR ENTERPRISE FUND, WHICH IS ALLOWED TO DO THAT BECAUSE REMEMBER, THESE FEES ARE ALSO UTILIZED TO PAY FOR DEBT DOLLARS. SO THAT'S HOW WE UTILIZE THOSE FUNDS. WHAT THAT DOES IS STABILIZES OUR
[01:55:03]
RATE BASE. NOT MANY UTILITIES CAN DO THAT BUT WE'VE BEEN DOING THAT FOR QUITE SOME TIME.I WOULD SAY AT LEAST TEN TO 15 YEARS HERE AND WE ARE ABLE TO DO THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT REVENUE PICK.
>> THAT'S IT. >> LOOK AT THAT.
>> THANK YOU. WHAT WE DIDN'T FINISH, WE CAN CONTINUE FRIDAY.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.