[Call meeting to order]
[00:00:10]
>> HI. GOOD AFTERNOON. WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER.
IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND STANDING UP, WE'RE GOING TO SAY THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. DR. HILSENBECK, WILL YOU PLEASE READ THE PUBLIC NOTICE STATEMENT?
THERE IT IS. THIS IS A PROPERLY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING HELD IN CON KURNS WITH REQUIREMENTS OF FLORIDA LAW. THE PUBLIC WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT ON TOPICS RELEVANT TO THE AGENCY'S AREA OF JURISDICTION, BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO OFFER COMMENT AT A DESIGNATED TIME DURING THE HEARING.
THE PUBLIC SHALL SPEAK AT A TIME DURING THE MEETING ON EACH ITEM AND FOR A LENGTH OF TIME AS DESIGNATED BY THE CHAIRPERSON, WHICH SHALL BE THREE MINUTES.
SPEAKERS SHOULD IDENTIFY THEMSELVES, WHO THEY REPRESENT, AND THEN STATE THEIR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.
SPEAKERS MAY OFFER SWORN TESTIMONY. IF THEY DO NOT THE FACT THAT THE TESTIMONY IS NOT SWORN MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE AGENCY IN DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OR TRUTHFULNESS OF THE TESTIMONY. IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERB TIMM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE WHICH RECORD INCLUDES TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED.
ANY PHYSICAL OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE PRESENTED DURING THE HEARING SUCH AS DIAGRAMS, CHARTS, PHOTOGRAPHS OR WRITTEN STATEMENT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CLERK FOR INCLUSION INTO THE RECORD.
THE RECORD WILL THEN BE AVAILABLE FOR OTHER BOARD, AGENCY, COMMITTEE OR OTHER COUNTY IN REVIEW OF APPEAL RELATING TO THEM. AGENCY MEMBERS ARE REMINDED AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH ITEM THEY SHOULD STATE WHETHER THEY HAD ANY COMMUNICATION WITH THE APPLICANT OR ANY OTHER PERSON REGARDING THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ITEM OUTSIDE THE FORMAL HEARING OF THE AGENCY.
IF SUCH COMMUNICATION HAS OCCURRED, THE AGENCY MEMBER SHOULD THEN IDENTIFY THE PERSONS INVOLVED AND THE MATERIAL CONTENT OF THE COMMUNICATION. CIVILITY CLAUSE.
WE WILL BE RESPECTFUL OF ONE ANOTHER EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE. WE WILL DIRECT ALL
[PZA Meeting Minutes for Agency Approval: 06/26/25, 07/17/25, and 08/07/25]
COMMENTS TO THE ISSUES. WE WILL AVOID PERSONAL ATTACKS.>> THANK YOU, DR. HILSENBECK. AGENCY MEMBERS, YOU HAVE MINUTES BEFORE YOU THAT ARE FROM JUNEJUNE TH, JULY 17TH AND AUGUST 7T H.
CAN I GET A MOTION FOR APPROVAL? OKAY. IS THERE A SECOND?
ANY DISCUSSION ON THOSE MINUTES? SEEING NONE, CAN I GET -- ALL IN FAVOR SAY AYE? ANY OPPOSED? ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION CARRIES.
[10. SUPMAJ 2024-10 Crosby Family Venue. Request for a Special Use Permit to allow for an indoor/outdoor wedding and special event venue, meeting the general special use criteria of Land Development Code Section 2.03.01.A; specifically located at 855 Cherry Tree Road.]
BEFORE WE GO INTO PUBLIC COMMENTS ON ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA, I SEE MR. BURNETT. WOULD YOU PLEASE COME FORWARD FOR ITEM NUMBER 10? IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE APPLICANT WISHES TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION -- EXCUSE ME, WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION.>> I JUST DON'T WANT TO HOLD YOU UP. DOUG BURNETT, ST. JOHNS LAW GROUP HERE IN ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA. YES, MY CLIENT FOR APPLICANT -- MY CLIENT AND THE APPLICANT FOR AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 10 HAS WITHDRAWN THE APPLICATION OR WOULD REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE APPLICATION. AND WE PUT THAT IN WRITING IN AN E-MAIL TO YOUR STAFF AS WELL.
PERFECT. THAT BEING SAILED, CAN I GET A MOTION TO ACCEPT HIS WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPLICATION, PLEASE? OKAY.
ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT? ACTUALLY, BEFORE WE -- WE'RE GOING TO HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT BEFORE WE VOTE ON THAT.
BUT IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT IS HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THE WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPLICATION? NOW, BEFORE YOU COME UP PLEASE NOTE THAT HE IS WITHDRAWING THE APPLICATION. WE ARE NOT HEARING IT.
IT IS NOT EVEN IN THE SYSTEM ANYMORE.
IT WILL BE CLOSED OUT IN THE COUNTY SYSTEM AND NOT COMING UP FOR ANY KIND OF HEARING ANYTIME.
IS THAT CORRECT, JACOB? OKAY. SO IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE WITHDRAWAL? YES, SIR.
>> YES, THANK YOU. MY NAME IS MATTHEW MANSEL.
I'M THE PRESIDENT OF OAKBROOK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND I'M REPRESENTING ALL OF THE OWNERS WITHIN THE ASSOCIATION TODAY AT THE REQUEST. I'M AT 3305 SOUTH -- OR NORTH SILVER TREE WAY IN ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA.
WE'RE HAPPY TO SEE THAT THE APPLICATION WAS WITHDRAWN.
WE DEFINITELY HAD A LOT OF OPPOSITION WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. THERE IS A PETITION WITH OVER 450 SIGNATURES ON IT RIGHT NOW THAT OPPOSED THE
[00:05:01]
APPLICATION. SO WE'RE VERY HAPPY TO SEE THAT THE APPLICANT HAS WITHDRAWN THAT. AND WE THANK YOU FOR TAKING THAT BUSINESS UP TODAY.>> THANK YOU. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE ARE BACK INTO AGENCY. IF WE HAVE NO FURTHER DISCUSSION WE CAN JUST VOTE ON THE MOTION TO ACCEPT. AND -- HOLD ON ONE SECOND.
MR. LABANOWSKI, DID YOU HAVE SOMETHING TO
>> OKAY. LET'S GO AHEAD AND REGISTER YOUR VOTE. ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION PASSED. SO THAT ITEM HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN.
AND WE ARE GOING TO MOVE ON TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
IF YOU ARE HERE TO SPEAK ON ANY ITEM THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA, NOW IS THE TIME TO COME UP AND DO SO. ALL RIGHT.
[1. SUPMIN 2025-01 Smith Mobile Home. Request for a Special Use Permit pursuant to Section 2.03.08 of the Land Development Code to allow for the placement of a Manufactured/Mobile Home in Residential, Single-Family (RS-3) zoning, specifically located at 1088 W. 15th Street.]
SEEING NONE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 1.WOULD THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME FORWARD?
>> GOOD AFTERNOON, EVERYONE. MY NAME IS TRACY SMITH.
>> CAN I INTERRUPT YOU FOR ONE
>> I FORGOT ONE THING. IS THERE ANY EX PARTE FROM AGENCY MEMBERS? MISS
I DID DO A SITE VISIT AND I DID HAVE A BRIEF CONVERSATION WITH THE APPLICANTS.
>> YES. I MADE A SITE VISIT ON THE 15TH.
>> OH, NO PROBLEM. MY NAME IS TRACY SMITH.
MY PROPERTY IS AT 1088 WEST 15TH STREET. AND I APPRECIATE Y'ALL TIME THIS AFTERNOON. GIVE ME A SECOND TO GET UP TO HOW TO PROPERLY DO THIS, WHICH DIRECTION THE SLIDES ARE GOING IN.
OKAY. WE'RE REQUESTING A SPECIAL PERMIT. AND THE ACTUAL PROPERTY ISIS HERE. I'M NOT USED TO ALL THIS NICE TECHNOLOGY THAT LETS YOU DRAW ON IS THE PROPERTY RIGHT HERE.
IT'S ON THE CORNER OF 15TH AND CLAY.
AND THIS IS A ZONING VIEW OF THE SAME PROPERTY.
MIXED USE AND RESIDENTIAL. OKAY.
THIS IS BASICALLY WHAT YOU SEE WHEN YOU GET AN OVERVIEW, BASICALLY IS A NICE LOT WITH LOTS OF TREES, OAK TREES AND WHATNOT. AND LOOKS LIKE A LOT OF TRADITIONAL ST. AUGUSTINE. THE LAST PART, WHICH IS THE SITE PLAN, IS NOT ON HERE. SO THE SITE PLAN IS GOING TO BE RIGHT HERE ON THE OVERHEAD. AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, JUST REALLY BRIEFLY, THIS IS THE DRAIN FIELD RIGHT BACK HERE. THE UNIT IS GOING TO BE HERE FACING EAST AND WEST.
AND THIS IS CLAY STREET AND 15TH STREET. AND THIS WILL BE A DRIVEWAY.
>> ANY QUESTIONS FOR APPLICANT? MR. OLSON.
PRESS YOUR BUTTON. IT'S COMING.
>> JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS. I NOTICED THAT THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDINGS HAD PRIMARILY SITE- BUILT HOMES INCLUDING ONE THAT LOOKS VERY NEW, A TWO- STORY THAT'S ON THE ADJACENT SIDE --
>> YEAH. JUST ABOVE YOUR DRAIN FIELD.
SO YOU'VE CONFIRMED THAT YOU'RE DOING A DOUBLE WIDE WITH A
SLOPED ROOF. >> WELL, IT'S NOT -- I'M SORRY.
GO AHEAD. FINISH WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.
>> WILL IT BE ON A PERMANENT FOUNDATION?
>> NO, IT WILL NOT BE ON A -- ARE YOU ASKING ABOUT A SLAB
YES. >> NO, IT WILL NOT BE ON A SLAB FOUNDATION. IT WILL BE ON A REINFORCED, RAISED KIND OF FOUNDATION.
>> WHAT TYPE OF SUPPORT WILL THE STRUCTURE HAVE?
>> I'D BE GUESSING. BUT WHEN YOU SAY SUPPORT --
>> WELL, WHAT WILL BE -- BETWEEN THE ACTUAL -- WHAT'S BETWEEN THE ACTUAL OCCUPIED FLOORFLOOR GROUND AREA THAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE --
>> IF I'M CORRECT, BLOCK REINFORCEMENT WITH SOME SORT OF -- SOME SORT OF SUPPORT GOING BETWEEN THE BLOCKS.
>> OKAY. JUST AS A SIDE, THE REASON I'M ASKING SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS IS THAT A MANUFACTURED -- PREMANUFACTURED HOME, IF IT'S TREATED IN CERTAIN WAYS THEY'RE NOT -- I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE IMMEDIATE ENVIRONMENT
[00:10:02]
RELATIVE TO ANY DIMINISHED VALUE OF SURROUNDING SITE- BUILT HOMES. AND THE TYPICAL THING IS THAT IF IT'S TREATED -- IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS IF IT'S TREATED LIKE WITH A LANDSCAPING AND AROUND THE FOUNDATION, BUFFERING, THAT IT GENERALLY DOES NOT IN MOST CASES HAVE ANY SIGNIFICANT DEPRECIATION OF SURROUNDING PROPERTIES FROM A VALUE STANDPOINT.THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING YOU AS TO HOW THE FOUNDATION IS TREATED AND THE LANDSCAPING AROUND IT.
AND I GUESS MY OTHER QUESTION IS NOT A PHYSICAL ONE, BUT WILL THIS STRUCTURE BE TREATED AS A LICENSED MOBILE HOME OR AS PART THE AD VALOREM VALUE OF THE
PROPERTY? >> THAT LAST LINE AGAIN.
>> WILL THE STRUCTURE BE TREATED AS A LICENSED MOBILE HOME OR WILL IT BE TREATED FOR TAXATION PURPOSES AS A PART OF THE AD VALOREM, THE VALUE -- TAXABLE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY? FOR COUNTY TAX REVENUE.
>> I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND THETHE PROBABLY IN THE WAY YOU'RE ASKING IT.
>> OKAY. MAYBE I'M NOT ASKING IT
CORRECTLY. >> ARE YOU ASKING IF HE'S GOING TO PAY PROPERTY TAXES ON HIS
BECAUSE YOU KNOW, MOBILE HOMES ARE GENERALLY TAXED DIFFERENTLY THAN SITE- BUILT STRUCTURES.
>> MAYBE SOMEONE ON THE PANEL HERE -- %-Ć LITTLE EXPERIENCE WITH THIS.
SO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ERECTING A MOBILE HOME AND THERE ARE CONDITIONS TO THIS ORDINANCE ARE THAT THE TOWING GEAR BE REMOVED.
SO BASICALLY YOU HAVE THE UNDERSTRUCTURE OF THE MOBILE HOME TYPICALLY SITTING ON PIERS THAT ARE ON A FOOTER.
THE ACTUAL UNDERNEATH OF THAT MOBILE HOME, THEY ACTUALLY CREATE A LITTLE CREST OF DIRT UNDER IT SO THAT WATER DOESN'T GATHER UNDER IT BECAUSE THAT USED TO BE A PROBLEM. AND THEN OUR CODE TYPICALLY REQUIRES SKIRTING AROUND IT SO THAT YOU CAN'T SEE THE UNDERBELLY OF IT, SO TO SPEAK. THERE IS NO NECESSARILY ABOVE AND BEYOND LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENT. AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT IF YOU WERE TO SEE THE WAY IT'S SECURED TO THE GROUND, ABOUT EVERY THREE FEET THERE'S THESE SCREWS THAT LONG THAT THEY SCREW INTO THE GROUND WITH A MACHINE AND THEN THAT'S ATTACHED TO A STRAP TO THE UNDERBELLY OF THE MOBILE HOME AND IT WORKS PRETTY WELL. WE HAVE TWO OF THOSE ON OUR PROPERTY.
>> OKAY. WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT DETAIL.
I GUESS -- WELL, I GUESS WE DON'T -- I MEAN, I'M NOT SURE HOW IMPORTANT FROM OUR STANDPOINT IS THE TAX SITUATION.
OH. >> THE MOBILE HOME IS CONSIDERED PERSONAL PROPERTY. SO IT'S NOT SUBJECT TO REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEN IT'S AFFIXED TO THE GROUND IN THAT FASHION. THE GROUND IS STILL TAXED, WHATEVER THE LOT IS WORTH, BUT NOT THE MOBILE HOME.
>> OKAY. I GUESS I'M MOST THEN CONCERNED THAT THE FOUNDATION AREA AND THE SITE IS PROPERLY LANDSCAPED TO NOT GIVE THE APPEARANCE TO THE OVERALL NEIGHBORHOOD OF ANYTHING THAT WOULD DIMINISH THE IMMEDIATE ADJACENT SITE- BUILT THE VERY NEW ONE IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THETHE NORTH. AND AS I ASK THAT QUESTION I RECOGNIZE THAT THIS NEIGHBORHOOD DOES HAVE MOBILE HOMES ON SEVERAL LOTS BUT IT ALSO HAS A NUMBER OF NEW SITE- BUILT CONSTRUCTION HOMES HAPPENING IN THIS NEIGHBORHOOD WHICH LOOKS LIKE A SUBSTANTIAL NEW INVESTMENT HAPPENING. SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOUR PLANS ARE FOR LANDSCAPING TO MAKE THIS PROPERTY BLEND IN MORE WITH THE SITE-BUILT HOMES THAT IMMEDIATELY SURROUND IT.
>> ACTUALLY, I PICKED THE HOME PRIMARILY BECAUSE OF THE DESIGN. IT IS A MODULAR.
SO IT'S GOING TO LOOK SOMEWHAT LIKE A MOBILE HOME.
BUT IT'S GOING TO HAVE A PORCH. IT'S GOING TO BE LANDSCAPED.
IT'S BASICALLY GOING TO LOOK LIKE A SMALL -- ALMOST LIKE SOMEONE WOULD CALL IT A WEEKENDER, BUT IT'S JUST A SMALL FRAME HOME, UNDER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. SO MY GOAL IS TO MAKE IT LOOK AS BLENDED WITH THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS POSSIBLE JUST FOR THE VALUE'S SAKE AND FOR PROPERTIES THAT I HAVE IN
[00:15:01]
THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT I WANT TO BUILD TOO.SO IT DOES ME GOOD TO MAKE SURE IT LOOKS PRESENTABLE.
>> JUST REAL QUICK, PREVIOUSLY THERE WAS A MOBILE HOME ON THAT PROPERTY?
>> NOW THERE'S A BEAUTIFUL TREE THAT SETS RIGHT THERE.
>> THAT'S ALL I NEED TO KNOW. THANK YOU.
>> I WAS WAITING TO MAKE A MOTION AS SOON AS WE HAVE --
>> AND ALSO UNDER PAGE 6 ITEM D UNDER THE SECTION 2.03. 06 IT TALKS ABOUT THE EXTERIOR SKIRTING. I THINK SOME OF THE QUESTION'S BEEN ASKED PRETTY MUCH ON PAGE 6 OF OUR STAFF REPORT.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT.
THANK YOU, SIR. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBERNUMBER 1? SEEING NONE WE'RE BACK INTO THE AGENCY FOR A MOTION. MR. GREEN?
>> LET ME GET BACK TO WHERE THE MOTION -- HERE WE GO.
WE. MADAM CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SUPMIN2025- 01 THE SMITH MOBILE HOME BASED ON EIGHT FINDINGS OF FACTS AND TEN CONDITIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED IN OUR STAFF
REPORT. >> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL.
>> SECOND BY DR. HILSENBECK. ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE. ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION PASSES 7-0.
[2. SUPMAJ 2025-08 Cheerworks. Request for a Special Use Permit, pursuant to Section 2.03.43 of the Land Development Code, to allow for Commercial Recreation in Industrial Warehousing (IW) zoning, specifically located at 501 Marshall Circle Units 505 & 506.]
>> THANK YOU. YOU HAVE A GOOD AFTERNOON.
>> YOU TOO. ITEM NUMBER 2, WOULD THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME FORWARD? AND IS THERE ANY EX PARTE? MR. LABANOWSKI.
>> YES, MADAM CHAIR, I VISITED THE SITE ALSO.
>> I VISITED THE SITE AND THEN I HAD QUESTIONS AND CONTACTED MISS WRENCH ABOUT MY QUESTIONS.
SORRY, I'M REALLY NERVOUS. I'M AT 117 BROOKFALL DRIVE.
AND I'M HERE TODAY TO REQUEST AN AAPPROVAL FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO RUN CHEERWORKS OFF DOBBS ROAD.
SO WE ARE CHEERWORKS. WE WANT TO BE LOCATED AT 501 MARSHALL CIRCLE IN SUITES 505 AND 506.
TO THE RIGHT IS OUR LOGO AND OUR COLORS ARE TEAL, PINK AND GOLD. CHEERWORKS IS A YOUTH- FOCUSED ATHLETIC FACILITY DEDICATED TO CHEERLEADING, TUMBLING AND PERFORMANCE SKILLS. WE HAVE PROGRAMS FOR AGES 3 TO 18. OUR TUMBLE CLASSES ARE FOR ALL SKILL LEVELS.
WE FOCUS ON SKILLS, TEAMWORK AND CONFIDENCE.
WE HAVE AWAY FAMILY- FRIENDLY INDOOR- ONLY FACILITY.
AND ALL OF OUR TEAMS ARE LED BY TRAINED, BACKGROUND- CHECKED COACHES. THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW OF 501 MARSHALL CIRCLE. THE CIRCLE IN RED IS WHERE 505 AND 506 ARE LOCATED.
TO THE RIGHT ON THE SCREEN I DID PUT IN OUR HOURS OF OPERATION. WE ARE 3:00 TO 9:00 P.M.
MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY. SATURDAYS 9:00 A.M. TO 9:00 P.M.
AND SUNDAYS BY APPOINTMENTAPPOIN TMENT ONLY.
THERE ARE MOST -- OUR MOST NEIGHBORING BUSINESSES ARE CLOSED DURING OUR PEAK HOURS, REDUCING PARKING AND TRAFFIC IMPACT.
I DID PUT ABOUT THREE BUSINESSES UP THERE MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY, AND LOOKS LIKE ALL OF THEM ARE CLOSED SATURDAY AND SUNDAY.
AM I ALLOWED TO MAKE A COMMENT ON THAT?
>> THERE ARE NINE BUSINESSES IN MARSHALL CIRCLE.
I ONLY PULLED UPUP THREE. FOUR BUSINESSES CLOSE BETWEEN 3:00 P.M. AND 5:00 P.M. AND FIVE BUSINESSES CLOSE BETWEEN 5:00 AND 6:00 P.M. JUST WANTED TO ADD THAT IN THERE. SORRY. HERE IS A PICTURE OF THE FRONT OF 505 MARSHALL CIRCLE.
WE HAVE TEN DEDICATED SPOTS -- SORRY, SPOTS FOR CHEERWORKS.
WE ARE A DROP-OFF- ONLY FACILITY, SO MOST PARENTS DROP OFF THEIR ATHLETES AND THEN RETURN LATER, MINIMIZING THE PARKED CARS.
IT'S REALLY JUST GOING TO BE US STAFF IN THERE.
OH, YEAH, SORRY, WE HAVE TEN ON- SITE SPACES DEDICATED FOR CUSTOMERS AND STAFF USE.
WE DO HAVE STAGGERED CLASS TIMES. SO IT LIMITS OVERLAPPING THE DROP-OFF AND THE PICKUP.
WE DO UNDERSTAND THERE ARE OTHER BUSINESSES THERE.
SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT HOGGING UP THE LANE. WE DO HAVE EVENING PEAK HOURS.
SO THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES ARE CLOSED, ENSURING AMPLE AVAILABLE PARKING. HERE IS ANOTHER AERIAL VIEW WITH THE -- SORRY. THIS IS THE WAY THAT THE PARENTS WILL BE DIRECTED TO USE THE TRAFFIC FLOW FOR DROP- OFF
[00:20:02]
AND PICKUP TO ALSO AVOID THE CONGESTION. THEY WILL BE DROPPING OFF THEIR KIDS ON THE RIGHT SIDE AND CIRCLING RIGHT OUT.THIS IS A GOOGLE SEARCH I DID. THIS IS FOR CHEER GYMS IN ST.
AUGUSTINE. UNFORTUNATELY, WE DON'T HAVE A LOT FOR THE KIDS. WHEN I LOOKED UP THE CLOSEST ONES I HAD SPARK ATHLETICS, WHICH IS ABOUT 14 MILES AWAY. ZONE CHEER IS 19 MILES NORTH.
AND IF YOU WANT TO GO SOUTH, THE NEXT CLOSEST GYM IS IN PALM COAST AND THAT'S 23 MILES AWAY. I BELIEVE CHEERWORKS IS FILLING A LOCAL NEED. THERE ISN'T A DEDICATED CHEER TUMBLING FACILITY CURRENTLY EXISTING IN THIS PART OF ST.
AUGUSTINE. LIKE I SAID EARLIER THE NEAREST COMPARABLE GYMS ARE 14 TO 23 MILES AWAY, CREATING BARRIERS FOR MANY FAMILIES. THEY'RE DRIVING TO JACKSONVILLE. THEY'RE DRIVING TO DAYTONA, ORLANDO. WE CAN HAVE THEM RIGHT HERE AT HOME. WE HAVE LIMITED LOCAL ACCESS TO SAFE EQUIPPED TRAINING SPACES FOR YOUTH ATHLETICS.
IT'S VERY HARD TO COME ACROSS A PRACTICE FACILITY FOR KIDS.
WE BELIEVE IT'S GOING TO BE A BENEFIT FOR THE COMMUNITY. WE ARE PROVIDING A SAFE SUPERVISED ENVIRONMENT FOR CHILDREN AND TEENS AFTER SCHOOL AND ON WEEKENDS.
SORRY. WE'RE ENCOURAGING PHYSICAL FITNESS, DISCIPLINE, TEAMWORK AND CONFIDENCE. WE'RE CREATING LOCAL PART- TIME JOBS AND SUPPORTING NEARBY BUSINESSES THROUGH INCREASED TRAFFIC. AND WE'RE STRENGTHENING COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT THROUGH EXHIBITIONS, OPEN HOUSES AND PARTNERSHIPS WITH LOCAL BUSINESSES.
WE ARE COMMITTED TO BEING A POSITIVE AND RESPECTFUL NEIGHBOR IN ST. AUGUSTINE. WE WILL BE OPERATING IN A WAY THAT IS SAFE, ORGANIZED AND COMMUNITY-FOCUSED. AND WE WILL BE PROVIDING OPPORTUNITIES FOR YOUTH TO GROW, LEARN AND SUCCEED.
>> THANK YOU. ARE THERE ANY QUESTIONS? MR. MATOVINA.
>> STAFF HAS SUGGESTED THAT THIS, IF APPROVED, WOULD NOT BE BE TRANSFERRABLE AS ONE OF THE CONDITIONS. IS THAT A CONCERN AT ALL TO YOU? WHEN SOMEBODY ELSE WOULD BE TAKING OVER THE BUSINESS.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SEEING NONE, IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 2? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE'RE BACK INTO THETHE AGENCY FOR COMMENT.
>> YOU DID A GREAT JOB. ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT CHEERWORKS, IT'S OBVIOUS YOU'RE REALLY PASSIONATE ABOUT THIS AND THAT'S A REALLY GOOD THING FOR OUR COMMUNITY.
I THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA, AND I THINK THE LOCATION IS GOOD ALSO. IT IS A LITTLE TUCKED AWAY SO YOU'RE NOT GOING TO HAVE JUST RANDOM TRAFFIC GOING BY, PUTTING THE KIDS IN HARM'S WAY. I THINK IT'S GREAT, AND I DON'T FLOW.
I'M PREPARED TO MAKE A MOTION IF ANYBODY DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO
SAY. >> I WILL MAKE THE COMMENT, MY DAUGHTER GOES TO ZONE AND IT'S PACKED TO THE BRIM WITH PARENTS AND KIDS COMING FROM AIN'T AUGUSTINE.
SO IT WILL BE A NICE NEED IN THAT AREA.
GOOD THING FOR THE KIDS. ANYTHING FOR THE KIDS TO DO I
>> OKAY. ANYWAY, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SUPMAJ 2025- 08 CHEERWORKS BASED UPON EIGHT FINDINGS OF FACT AND TEN CONDITIONS AS PROVIDED IN THE
STAFF REPORT. >> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. IS THERE A SECOND?
>> MR. OLSON, DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING?
ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE.
ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU, MISS WRENCH.
[3. SUPMAJ 2025-10 SEA Community Help Resource Center Expansion. Request to revise a previously approved Special Use Permit (SUPMAJ 2022-11), allowing a Resource Center in Residential, Single Family (RS-3) zoning, to add four (4) new lots and a storage building to the proposed project boundary, specifically located at 6284 Armstrong Road.]
>> THANK YOU SO MUCH. THANK YOU.
>> ON TO ITEM NUMBER 3. WOULD THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME FORWARD? AND IS THERE ANY EX PARTE? MR. LABANOWSKI.
>> YES, I DID A SITE VISIT. HAD A LITTLE CONVERSATION WITH A COUPLE OF NEIGHBORS, A PHONE CONVERSATION WITH MALINDA PEEPLES, AND THEN JUST HAD AN IN- PERSON CONVERSATION WITH MISS PEEPLES AS WELL.
>> SITE VISIT ON AUGUST 17TH. AND I BICYCLE THROUGH THAT AREA REGULARLY.
>> OKAY. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT.
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. KAREN TAYLOR.
I HAVE A NEW ADDRESS FOR YOU. IT'S 18 NORTH ST. AUGUSTINE BOULEVARD. THAT'S ST. AUGUSTINE, 32080.
ANYWAY, I JUST MOVED INTO MY OFFICE TO MY HOUSE. AND MALINDA AND I ARE JUST KIND OF HERE TO -- AND THIS MIGHT BE A LITTLE BIT OF AN OVERKILL OF A POWERPOINT.
I'VE GOT TO GRAB THAT. I KNOW MOST OFOF YOU THIS
[00:25:07]
THE LAST TIME, SO YOU KIND OF KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING ON IT.SO THIS IS THE REQUEST TO REVISE AND ADD TO THAT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SPECIAL USE THAT PROVIDED FOR THE RESTORATION AND RENOVATION OF THAT HOME WHICH WAS CONSIDERED HISTORIC, BUT IT'S BASICALLY A RANCH- STYLE HOUSE BUT IT WAS BUILT IN THE '50S. SO THAT'S HISTORIC, LIKE I AM.
AND THAT'S FOR MEETING SPACE MUSEUM SPACE FOR THE GULAGICHI ARTIFACTS.
AND BY THE WAY, ARMSTRONG HAS OVER 100GULAGICHI RESIDENTS. I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT NUMBER.
I THINK IT CHANGES. SO THAT KIND OF ALLOWED FOR THAT. AND THE RESOURCE CENTER. AND NOW WE'RE ADDING THE FIVE NEW LOTS THAT WERE DEEDED TO THE COUNTY.
I MEAN, DEEDED FOR THE COUNTY. FOUR OF THOSE ARE TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A STORAGE BUILDING. THAT'S KIND OF PART OF WHAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING THE AT THE CHURCH FOR YEARS.
AND THAT WILL BE A BUILDING IN A COVERED AREA TO DO ALL THE DISTRIBUTION AND ALL THE THINGS THAT THEY DO.
SO WE'RE ADDING THE . 48 ACRES. AND IT IS ON RAILS TO TRAILS ASAS KNOW.
THE LOCATION KIND OF SHOWS YOU WHERE IT IS.
A LITTLE CLOSER YOU KIND OF SEE HOW YOU GET INTO ARMSTRONG.
THAT'S THE SAME WAY YOU GET OUT BECAUSE IT BASICALLY ENDS IN TIMBERLAND. AND THE BLUE IS WHAT WE CAME TO YOU BEFORE WITH AND THE RED IS WHAT WE'RE HERE FOR TODAY.
AND GOING BACK TOO YOU CAN SEE THE RELATIONSHIP TO THE PARK. AND THIS IS THE PARK AND THIS IS THE PARK HERE. AND THAT'S THAT SPUR THAT'S OFF THE TRAIL. IT'S AI.
YOU SEE THE PUBLIC FAIRGROUNDS ARE PRETTY MUCH THE ONLY OTHER THING IN THE AREA.
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY 3, WHICH IS WHY WE HAVE TO BE HERE. IT DOES HAVE FRONTAGE THROUGH THE OTHER . 55 ACRES ON ARMSTRONG ROAD AND OBVIOUSLY ON THAT TRAIL. SO AGAIN, IT'S FOR THAT . 48 ACRES. AND THIS SITE -- THESE WERE PLANTED IN 1913. SO THEY'RE ACTUALLY, IF YOU START LOOKING AT THE SITE PLAN, YOU'LL SEE THEY LOOK LIKE THEY LEAN.
AND THEY DO. THEY'RE NOT PERPENDICULAR.
SO AGAIN, THE SITE'S TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR RESOURCE CENTER FOR ALL OF THE THINGS THAT THEY DO AND ALSO TO HELP THEM WHEN THEY DO THEIR GLLA GEECHEE FESTIVAL. THAT'S JUST A LITTLE BACKGROUND, AND THESE ARE JUST A FEW OF THE THINGS THAT THEY DO. THEY DO COMMUNITY MEALS, MIGRANT FARMWORKER MEALS, THEY HAVE A FOOD PANTRY, SCHOOL SUPPLIES. THEY DISTRIBUTE FOR THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS. THERE'S A CLOTHES CLOSET. THERE'S AFTER- SCHOOL ACTIVITIES. JUST ALL SORTS OF THINGS.
AND THEY ALSO INCLUDE ALL THE MOBILE THINGS.
SO THIS SITE IS WHERE THE BLOOD BANK WOULD BECOME OR THE LIBRARY OR WHEREVER AS WELL. THE ORIGINAL THING IS FOR THE DISPLAY OF THE ARTIFACTS AND FOR OFFICE SPACE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE.
AND AT THE TIME WE THOUGHT POSSIBLY BICYCLE REPAIR ITEMS. WE'LL PROBABLY USE THAT, THE STORAGE SHED MORE FOR THAT. MAKES SENSE.
MALINDA'S BEEN COLLECTING BICYCLES FOR A FEW YEARS.
AND SO THAT'S UNDER WAY. IT'S GONE A LITTLE SLOWER THAN WE'D LIKE. BUT WE'RE GOING TO CHANGE THAT, GET THAT FIGURED OUT.
THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT THE STAFF WAS NICE ENOUGH TO PREPARE FOR US OR WHATEVER. THAT BUILDING MAY MOVE A LITTLE BIT TO THE NORTH BECAUSE WE WANT TO HAVE THAT DRIVE COME UP TO THE BUILDING AND THINGS SO THAT PEOPLE CAN COME UP AND TURN AROUND AND THEN LEAVE. AND EVENTUALLY WE WOULD LIKE TO TAKE IT ALL THE WAY AROUND IF WE CAN GET ACCESS THROUGH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES. SO THAT'S WHAT WAS APPROVED AND HAS BEEN APPROVED. AND THIS I JUST KIND OF PUT IN. THIS IS WHAT THE HISTORIC
[00:30:02]
GRANT IS FOR, IS RESTORING THIS LITTLE HOUSE. AND THE ARCHITECT WAS CONNOR DOWLING WITH OPEN CITY ARCHITECTURE, CITY ENGINEER JEREMY CALLAWAY.LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT JEREMY MARQUEE WITH MLH.
SURVEY, FLINT SURVEYING AND MAPPING.
RYAN CARTER HELPED US WITH IT. AND THE CONTRACTOR ON THIS IS ERIC SAKS. AND HE HAS A NON- PROFIT OPERATION LIFELINE IS HIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. AND IT'S ALL VETERANS OR WHATEVER. AND IT'S VOLUNTEER WORK FOR MOST OF THEM.
THAT'S WHY IT MAY TAKE A LITTLE LONGER AS WE WORK THROUGH IT. JUST A CLOSER LOOK AT THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
LITTLE LANDSCAPE PLAN. SO EVENTUALLY, I'VE GOT IT IN RED, DOTTED LINE, THAT'S THE LOTS WE WOULD LIKE TO GET. AND I THINK THAT'S COMING WHETHER IT'S AN EASEMENT FROM THEM OR WHATEVER THAT'S BEEN INVOLVED IN A FAMILY DISPUTE BECAUSE THERE WASN'T ANY WILL WHEN THE PERSON DIED.
THIS IS SPECIAL USE IS DEFINED AS SOMETHING THAT WOULDN'T BE APPROPRIATE GENERALLY WITHOUT RESTRICTION THROUGHOUT THE ZONING DIVISION. A RESOURCE CENTER ISN'T ANYTHING THAT'S SPECIFICALLY LISTED IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE.
IT DOESN'T ALLOW FOR PICNIC AREAS AND COUNTRY CLUBS, THINGS LIKE THAT. WHEN WE ORIGINALLY CLAIM THEY CALLED IT A NOT LISTED SPECIAL USE.
SO WE'RE OUR OWN SPECIAL USE. GOING THROUGH COMP PLAN AMENDMENT AND SUCH. BUT WE DO HAVE ENOUGH ACREAGE NOW, AND ESPECIALLY IF WE GET TO ADD THE OTHER PIECE I'LL BE BACK FOR AND YOU WE'RE JUST GOING TO REZONE IT TO OR WHICH ALLOWS THESE KIND OF EVENT SPACES AND STORAGE AND ALL THOSE KINDS OF THINGS. SO YOU MAY SEE US HERE NOT TOO FAR. AND YOU KNOW ALL THESE THINGS.
I'LL JUST KEEP COMPATIBILITY WITH IT. IT'S BEEN HERE, THE PLACE THAT THEY OPERATE HAS BEEN THERE.
IT'S PART OF THE COMMUNITY. AND THESE FIRST PICTURES ACTUALLY ARE FROM THE FIRST TIME I WENT OUT THERE BECAUSE WHEN I WENT OUT THE OTHER DAY TO TAKE PICTURES IT'S SO COVERED WITH VEGETATION THAT YOU CAN'T SEE ANYTHING.
SO I USED THESE JUST TO KIND OF SHOW YOU, THAT'S ACROSS THE STREET, LOOKING ALONG THE BICYCLE TRAIL.
THAT WAS SOME RECENT DRAINAGE THINGS THAT THE COUNTY HAD DONE THEN. SO THAT'S GREAT. IT'S FUNCTIONING FOR THIS.
THAT'S THE TRAIL. BUT YOU CAN TELL THIS IS MORE IN THE FALL THAN RIGHT NOW IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SUMMER. CAN'T REALLY SEE THROUGH IT.
AND THAT WAS THE LITTLE HOUSE BEFORE IT STARTED BEING DEMOLISHED. NOW THAT'S WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT DID GO OUT THERE YO KNOW WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.
THE NEXT TWO THINGS ARE TO POUR A NEW FLOORING IN IT AND PUT THE TRUSSES ON AND GET THE ROOF ON.
WE'RE HOPING THAT HAPPENS PRETTY SOON. THAT'S KIND OF JUST A PICTURE WHERE THE SEPTIC TANK IS IN THE BACK LOOKING TO THE STREET.
AND THAT JUST SHOWS YOU SOME OF THE PART -- THE SITE THAT'S GOING TO BE ADD ED. THERE'S NO SUBSTANTIAL TREES.
WE DID SAVE SOME. ON THE ORIGINAL SITE THERE WERE SOME REALLY NICE TREES. THIS IS MOSTLY JUST SMALL.
THEY DON'T EVEN SHOW UP ON A TREE SURVEY.
KIND OF THE WHOLE THING. AND NOTICE EVERYTHING WAS POSTED AS IT WAS. THEN THEY HAVE THIS SIGN ON THERE TOO THAT SOMEBODY CAN KIND OF GO UP AND DONATE IF THEY WANT TOO. AND READ ABOUT THE PROJECT, YES.
THIS IS THE ARMSTRON PARK FACILITIES THAT ARE RIGHT DOWN. AND THE TRAILHEAD THERE. AND JUST WHERE THEY HAVE ALL THEIR ACTIVITIES.
USUALLY WHEN THEY DO HAVE THE GULLAH GEECHEE FESTIVAL THAT'S HERE. THIS IS THE CHURCH AREA WHERE THEY'VE BEEN DOING ALL THE OTHER STUFF.
YOU PICK UP MEALS THERE. THEY STORE EVERYTHING THERE.
AND AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S KIND OF MAKESHIFT. IT HAS BEEN FOR A LONG TIME.
AND SO THOSE -- ALL OF THESE THINGS WILL NOW BE UNDER COVER AND IN A NICE CENTRAL PLACE.
WE FEEL LIKE IT'S COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA. AND A LOT OF PEOPLE RELY ON IT AND PARTICIPATE IN GIVING AND DOING THINGS.
CONSISTENT WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AND
[00:35:05]
THE POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THEY DO HAVE A GRANT FOR THE ORIGINAL BUILDING AND THEY'RE GETTING AN EXTENSION ON THAT.AND THEN THEY HAVE ANOTHER GRANT NOW THAT WILL HELP BUILD THIS STORAGE SHED. WE'RE JUST REQUESTING YOUR APPROVAL. WE'RE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. I'D LIKE MALINDA TO SAY SOMETHING BEFORE WE FINISH.
>> I'M MALINDA PEEPLES. 68231 ARMSTRONG ROAD, ELKTON, FLORIDA. AND I JUST WANT TO SAY WE APPRECIATE Y'ALL HELP AND WE HAVE BEEN WORKING OUT IN ARMSTRONG FOR MANY YEARS FOR MANY SERVICES.
AS SHE SAYS, WE'VE BEEN DOING IT FROM THE PARKING LOT OF OUR CHURCH AND ONCE WE GOT THE LAND THAT WE ACCUMULATED NOW WE JUST WANT TO EXPAND IT TO DO MORE SERVICES. WE DO A LOT OF SERVICES.
MIGRANT, LOW- INCOME FAMILIES. WE JUST DID A BACK TO SCHOOL EVENT WHICH WE DID ABOUT 300 BOOK BAGS, SCHOOL SUPPLIES FOR THE KIDS.
TOMORROW, FRIDAY WE DO FOOD BASKET GIVEAWAY EVERY FRIDAY, MEALS.
THANKSGIVING, CHRISTMAS. HEALTH UNIT.
WE TRY TO DO EVERY LITTLE THING THAT WE CAN TO HELP IMPROVE SOMEONE LIFE. SO THANK YOU ALL FOR HELPING US, MAKING THIS REALITY COME TO FULL PLANS.
THANK Y'ALL. WE REALLY APPRECIATE THE HELP.
AND Y'ALL WILL BE HELPING US TO CONTINUE TO HELP OTHERS THAT ARE IN NEED.
>> THANK YOU, MA'AM. I THINK WE MIGHT HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS. MR. LABANOWSKI?
>> JUST REAL QUICK, I'M DEFINITELY IN SUPPORT OF THIS THING.
BUT I HAD ONE QUESTION. YOU HAD STATED THAT THE STORAGE BUILDING ITSELF MAY BE MOVED A LITTLE BIT MORE NORTH?
>> FROM WHERE IT SHOWS ON THE SITE PLAN?
>> CLOSER TO THE WALKING PATH?
>> BECAUSE YOU CAN'T GO ANY FARTHER TO THE LEFT THERE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE YOUR SEPTIC SYSTEM IS. THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING.
>> I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE.
>> YEAH. BUT THOSE LOTS TOO ARE NOT AS DEEP AS THE OTHER ONES BECAUSE THE COUNTY KEPT THAT. AND ACTUALLY THE PATHWAY IS NOT IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
THE PATHWAY IS IN THAT 20 FEET THAT THEY TOOK OFF THE LOTS.
WE CAN'T GO ANY FARTHER THAN THAT, AND WE DO HAVE TO MEET MEET
SETBACKS. >> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, WE'LL ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. IS THERE ANYONE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 3? ALL RIGHT.
WE'RE BACK INTO THE AGENCY FOR A MOTION.
>> WELL, I WAS EXCITED TO FIND OUT ABOUT THIS.
I DID NOT KNOW. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU DON'T KNOW. SO THAT'S EXCITING.
I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO FINDING OUT MORE ABOUT THIS PROJECT AND SEEING HOW WE CAN ALL WORK TOGETHER AS COMMUNITY AND MAKE LIFE BETTER FOR PEOPLE. THAT'S GOOD.
I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION IF THAT'S OKAY.
I'D GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SUPMAJ 2025- 10SEA COMMUNITY HELP RESOURCE CENTER EXPANSION BASED UPON EIGHT FINDINGS OF FACT AND EIGHT CONDITIONS AS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT.
>> WE HAVE MOTION FOR APPROVAL AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE. ALL RIGHT.
[4. ZVAR 2025-12 6951 Charles Street (Detached Garage). Request for a Zoning Variance to Section 6.01.03.E.3 of the Land Development Code to allow for a reduced second Front Yard setback of three (3) feet in lieu of the required fifteen (15) feet for a Corner Lot located in Residential, Single Family (RS-2) zoning to accommodate construction of a detached garage.]
THAT MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU, MISS TAYLOR. ON TO ITEM NUMBER 4. IS THERE ANY EX PARTE? DR. HILSENBECK.>> I MET WITH PAT HAMILTON AND KETO BURNS.
KETO IS HEAD OF SACA THE SOUTH ANASTASIA COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, ON MONDAY THE 18TH. AND THEN I VISITED THE SITE WITH PAT SHORTLY THEREAFTER. WE KROEF DROVE DOWN THERE. LABANOWSKI.
>> I VISITED THE SITE AS WELL THIS PAST SUNDAY.
>> I DID A SITE VISIT. I HAD A PHONE CONVERSATION WITH JEN LUMBROOK.
>> I VISITED THE SITE AND RECEIVED SEVERAL COMMUNICATIONS, WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS.
>> NICK SEIBERT ONE OF THE OWNERS OF 6951.
I'D ACTUALLY LIKE TO ASK FOR A CONTINUANCE ON THIS ITEM TO A FUTURE DATE UNKNOWN DUE TO SOME NEW INFORMATION TO BRING OUR APPLICATION INTO CODE COMPLIANCE.
>> OKAY. IS THAT IN REFERENCE TO THE FENCE THAT WAS ON YOUR YARD?
>> CORRECT. >> ARE YOU GOING TO PROBABLY AMEND YOUR APPLICATION TO INCLUDE IT?
>> ALL RIGHT. HE'S REQUESTING --
>> I'M SORRY. WHAT WAS -- TO INCLUDE WHAT?
[00:40:02]
WHAT IS TO BE INCLUDED INCONTINUANCE? >> THERE IS AN EIGHT- FOOT WALL OR PARTITION THAT HE'S BUILDING AND THAT WOULD NOT BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE RIGHT NOW. AND SO HE IS ASKING FOR A CONTINUANCE TO COME BACK TO INCLUDE THAT AS PART OF HIS APPLICATION THE NEXT TIME HE
SO THAT WOULD BE THE MAIN CHANGE --
>> AND DO YOU HAVE A DATE FOR THAT? I GUESS THAT'S SCHEDULED WITH THE COUNTY. OKAY.
>> SO WE'LL DO A DATE UNCERTAIN.
OKAY. MR. GREEN, DID YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS?
>> THAT WAS MY QUESTION, WAS STAFF, WHETHER THEY'VE GOT ENOUGH TIME. BUT IT'S UNCERTAIN.
>> HOLD ON. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENTFIRST. BUT WE HAVE A COUPLE MORE QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS. MISS SPIEGEL.
>> I WAS JUST ASKING ABOUT -- I THINK THERE ARE PEOPLE HERE TO TALK ON THIS. I JUST DIDN'T KNOW HOW THAT
WORKED. >> YEAH, I'LL ASK FOR PUBLICPUBLIC
SIR, IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND JUST SITTING DOWN FOR ONE SECOND WE'RE GOING TO ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT AND THEN WE'LL GO BACK INTO AGENCY.
>> IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 4?
>> MY NAME'S BILL HAMILTON. I LIVE AT 7000 CHARLES STREET. I APOLOGIZE. I JUST WALKED IN THE DOOR. SO I DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING. IS HE GOING TO REDRAW AND
HE'S ASKING FOR A CONTINUANCE SO HE CAN COME BACK AND HAVE A SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT APPLICATION.
>> FAIR ENOUGH. SO THERE'S REALLY NO REASON FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON THIS APPLICATION BECAUSE IT'S NOT GOING TO BE THE SAME.
THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE IT. ANYONE ELSE? OKAY. WE'RE BACK INTO THE AGENCY FOR A MOTION.
>> I JUST -- ADDITIONAL COMMENT TO THE APPLICANT.
MAKE SURE THAT -- WHEN I VISITED THE SITE, THE HEARING NOTICE SIGN HAD BEEN TRAMPLED DOWN.
SO WHEN IT'SIT'S RESCHEDULED, WE JUST HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT SIGN IS NOT AS -- VERY VISIBLE AND NOT TRAMPLED DOWN.
>> I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE HERE ARE CLEAR, I DIDN'T HEAR THE APPLICANT SAY THAT HE'S GOING TO MOVE THE GARAGE.
I HEARD THE APPLICANT SAY HE'S GOING TO MODIFY HIS REQUEST TO ADD A REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FOR AN EIGHT-FOOT- TALL WALL. SO I DON'T WANT A GROUP OF PEOPLE TO LEAVE HERE TODAY THINKING HE'S MOVING THAT GARAGE IF THAT ISN'T HIS INTENTION.
>> I DIDN'T HEAR ANYTHING ABOUT A GARAGE.
>> ISN'T THAT WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT? I'M SORRY. YEAH.
>> SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU ALL UNDERSTAND THAT HE DIDN'T NECESSARILY SAY HE'S MOVING THE GARAGE IN THE REQUEST FOR THAT VARIANCE. HE'S GOING TO ADD A REQUEST FOR AN ADDITIONAL VARIANCE.
>> SO WE'LL COMMENT ON BOTH ITEMS AT THE NEXT MEETING?
>> IT WOULDN'T BE -- IT WOULD BE AT A CERTAIN TIME.
WE DON'T KNOW WHAT DATE THAT WILL BE.
BUT AT THE NEXT MEETING IN WHICH HIS APPLICATION COMES FORWARD, YES.
BOTH OF THOSE WOULD BE TAKEN UP IN ONE APPLICATION.
>> CORRECT. SO WE'LL COMMENT ON THE GARAGE AT THAT TIME WITH THE EXCEPTION
FOR THE EIGHT-FOOT WALL. >> CORRECT.
>> SO AGAIN, NO REASON FOR PUBLIC COMMENT TODAY.
SO WE'LL JUST DO IT AT THE MEETING SOMETIME IN THE
ALL RIGHT. WE'RE BACK INTO THE AGENCY FOR A MOTION. MR. MATOVINA. OH, SORRY.
>> MOTION TO CONTINUE -- I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO CONTINUE VARIANCE 2025- 12 6951 CHARLES STREET TO A DATE UNCERTAIN.
>> ALL RIGHT. THE MOTION TO CONTINUE AND A SECOND. ANY DISCUSSION? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE. ALL RIGHT.
THAT MOTION TO CONTINUE IS PASSED. SO IT WILL BE BACK ON THE AGENDA AT SOME POINT, BUT YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED.
[5. ZVAR 2025-10 341 Lures Lane. Request for a Zoning Variance to Section 2.02.04.B.4 of the Land Development Code to allow for the eave height of an accessory metal building structure (18') to be greater than the eave height of the Main Use structure (11') along with a request to allow the square footage of 4,000 to exceed the main use of 2,064 square feet.]
WE'RE ON TO ITEM NUMBER 5. IS THERE ANY EX PARTE? MR. LABANOWSKI.YESTERDAY. >> ANYONE ELSE? MR. KIMMEL?
>> YES. MY NAME IS ALEX KIMMEL.
I LIVE AT 341 LURES LANE ST. AUGUSTINE, FLORIDA 32095.
[00:45:03]
I'M SEEKING A VARIANCE TO ALLOW ME TO BUILD A DETACHED METAL THAT EXCEEDS THE EAVE HEIGHT AND THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF MY DWELLING. I'VE OWNED THE PROPERTY SINCE 2011. I'M GOING TO DO THE SLIDES. SO I'M OFF OF U.S. 1. IF YOU GO DOWN STOKES LANDING YOU TURN LEFT ONTO WATERWOOD LANE WHICH IS A DIRT ROAD, IT'S A PRIVATE DIRT ROAD, YOU HAVE TO TURN RIGHT ON LURES LANE, WHICH IS ANOTHER DIRT ROAD.ONCE YOU GET ALMOST TO MY PLACE AN EASEMENT.
IT'S NOT A ROAD. WATERWOOD OR LURES ISN'T MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. WE DON'T GET -- POSTAL PACKAGES DON'T GET DELIVERED. ANYWAYS, I'M BACK IN THE WOODS WHERE WE'RE KIND OF FORGOTTEN ABOUT. SO ACCORDING -- LIKE I SAY, I BOUGHT THIS PROPERTY IN 2011. IT'S GOT TWO DWELLINGS ON IT.
THE DWELLING I LIVE IN. AND THEN AN OLDER SINGLE-WIDE MOBILE HOME. EVER SINCE I BOUGHT IT MY PLAN WAS TO REMOVE THE MOBILE HOME AND REPLACE IT WITH A GARAGE. I DIDN'T REALIZE I GUESS UNTIL NOW THAT THERE'S A -- ACCORDING TO THE LAND USE CODE YOU CAN'T PUT A GARAGE ANY BIGGER THAN YOUR HOME UNLESS IT'S BEHIND YOUR HOME. SO I'M OPEN RURAL ZONING.
THIS IS AN AERIAL VIEW. I DON'T THINK I HAVE A BIGGER -- NO, I DON'T.
OKAY. SO YOU CAN'T SEE IT, BUT THE MOBILE HOME IS -- WELL, YOU CAN'T EVEN SEE THAT. IS THERE A WAY TO BLOW THIS UP OR NO?
>> RIGHT HERE I DON'T KNOW IF YOU CAN SEE THAT, THAT'S WHERE THE SINGLE WIDE IS. THAT'S WHAT I WANT TO REPLACE AND PUT A METAL BUILDING IN ITS PLACE.
ABOUT FOUR YEARS AGO I BURIED ALL MY POWER.
BECAUSE I'M A FIREMAN, SO I GET RECALLED TO WORK DURING STORMS AND HURRICANES AND STUFF. AND WHEN WE LOSE POWER IN MY AREA IT CAN TAKE A WEEK TILL WE GET POWER BACK.
SO THE ORIGINAL POWER, IT RUNS DOWN LURES LANES AND COMES DOWN THE EAST SIDE OF MY PROPERTY. BUT IN ORDER TO BURY IT I HAD TO HAVE A POLE SET AND A TRANSFORMER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. I HAD TO HAVE AN FPL ENGINEER COME OUT. IN ORDER TO DO THAT WE HAD TO CROSS THE EASEMENT AND THEN SPLIT IT OFF TO BOTH DWELLINGS. AND THE REASON I DID THAT IS BECAUSE OF THE OAK TREES AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
IF I'M AT WORK AND A LIMB FALLS, I COULD BE WITHOUT POWER AND, YOU KNOW, REFRIGERATORS DIE, STUFF LIKE THAT.
WHICH I GOT MARRIED THREE YEARS AGO.
I HAVE TWO LITTLE BOYS. SO IT'S EVEN MORE IMPORTANT NOW IF I'M STUCK AT WORK. I DON'T WANT MY WIFE TO BE WITHOUT POWER. SO FOR ME TO PUT THE BUILDING BEHIND MY HOUSE ACCORDING TO FOLLOW THE LAND USE CODE IT'S TOO FAR FROM ANY AVAILABLE POWER.
ACCORDING TO FPL, THE ENGINEER, SHE SAID THEY WON'T BURY MORE THAN 200 FEET.
AND I DON'T HAVE ANY OVERHEAD LINES TO EVEN BURY FROM TO THAT AREA OF MY PROPERTY. ANOTHER THING IS I ALREADY HAVE 200 AMP SERVICE THAT'S BRAND NEW WHERE THAT SINGLE WIDE IS THAT I WAS PLANNING ON USING.
ANOTHER REASON I WOULD LIKE TO NOT PUT IT BEHIND MY HOUSE IS THAT WHOLE BACK HALF OF MY PROPERTY IS ALREADY AN ESTABLISHED PASTURE THAT'S FENCED.
I DON'T CURRENTLY HAVE LIVESTOCK ON IT BECAUSE I HAVE TWO LITTLE KIDS BUT ONCE THEY GET A LITTLE OLDER I WOULD LIKE TO GET SOME COWS AND KIND OF -- KIND OF THE WAY I WAS RAISED, YOU KNOW, WE HAD COWS AND STUFF GROWING UP. ANOTHER PROBLEM IS MY NEIGHBOR, MR. NEWTON, LIVES ON THE WEST SIDE OF MY PROPERTY. HE'S LIVED THERE 52 YEARS.
AND IF I PUT THE BUILDING BEHIND MY HOUSE IT WOULD PUT IT RIGHT NEXT TO HIS HOUSE, WHICH I'D RATHER NOT DO. I'M ASSUMING I'M PROBABLY GOING TO BE ASKED WHY SUCH A BIG BUILDING OR THE HEIGHT OR ANYTHING ELSE.
I HAVE A PRETTY LARGE COLLECTION OF ANTIQUE CARS AND MOTORCYCLES. AND RIGHT NOW THEY'RE ALL STORED -- OR MOST, PROBABLY HALF OF THE STUFF IS STORED AT MY MOM'S PROPERTY IN HER GARAGE, WHICH SHE'S 70 YEARS OLD AND AT SOME POINT SHE'S GOING TO SELL OR, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING'S GOING TO HAPPEN AND I'M GOING TO HAVE TO MOVE THAT STUFF.
SO I'M TRYING TO HAVE A BIG ENOUGH BUILDING TO STORE EVERYTHING I OWN. AND AS FAR AS THE HEIGHT I WANT TO PUT 14-FOOT DOORS. ACCORDING TO THE STEEL BUILDING COMPANY YOU HAVE TO HAVE AT LEAST A TWO- FOOT ABOVE YOUR DOOR ADD HEIGHT WHICH WOULD PUT ME AT 16 FOOT. THEY RECOMMENDED 18 FEET BECAUSE THAT OPENS UP THE OPTIONS OF A MEZZANINE OR A LOFT OR ANYTHING IF YOU WANT TO TRY TO ADD ADDITIONAL SPACE INSIDE THE BUILDING. IT GIVES YOU THE HEAD HEIGHT TO
[00:50:01]
DO IT. AND FOR ME IF I HAVE TO GET A VARIANCE FOR 16 FEET I MIGHT AS WELL DO IT FOR 18. THAT WAY I HAVE AS MUCH USABLE SPACE AS I POSSIBLY CAN FOR IN THE FUTURE.AGAIN, YEAH, I HAVE A LOT OF STUFF.
I WROTE IT DOWN IN CASE YOU'D CARE, BUT I HAVE NINE VEHICLES, SEVEN MOTORCYCLES, THREE TRACTORS, A CAMPER, A BOAT, AND A COUPLE TRAILERS ON TOP OF -- I HAVE ALL MY DAD'S -- MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN 2013.
>> HE LEFT ME ALL HIS -- ANYWAYS, I'VE GOT A LOT OF STUFF.
>> SOUNDS LIKE YOU'VE GOT A LOT OF TOYS.
>> YEAH. AND A LOT OF IT'S SENTIMENTAL. IT'S NOT SOMETHING I JUST WANT TO GET RID OF.
>> OKAY. WE MIGHT HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS.
>> JUST REAL QUICK, YOU'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE ONE ACCESS, YOUR DRIVEWAY, THAT THE HOUSE IS GOING TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE SHED, CORRECT? OR THE GARAGE.
>> HOW MANY TREES ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE TO PULL OUT IN ORDER TO BUILD THAT OR ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE TO TRY TO KEEP IT --
>> I'M TRYING TO KEEP AS MANY AS I CAN. THERE IS ONE ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING MOBILE HOME THAT IT WOULD BE IN THE FOOTPRINT -- WELL, I CAN SHOW YOU.
IN THE FOOTPRINT. IT'S LIKE RIGHT HERE.
IT'S IN THE FOOTPRINT. BUT IT'S GOT A -- IT'S ALREADY GOT A SPLIT IN THE BASE OF IT.
SO IT'S KIND OF ONE HURRICANE AWAY FROM COMING DOWN. AND IT'S HANGING OVER THE MOBILE HOME.
THAT'S WHY I HAVEN'T CUT IT DOWN, BECAUSE IT WILL FALL ON THE MOBILE HOME IF I TRY TO REMOVE IT.
>> SO YOU HAVE A LOT OF TOYS AN% YOU'RE A GOOD FAMILY PLAN.
I LIKE THAT. I LIKE FAMILY. IT'S IMPORTANT. SO REALLY THE REASON THAT YOU EVEN HAVE TO BE HERE RIGHT NOW IS BECAUSE YOU'RE IN A MANUFACTURED HOME THAT ONLY IS 11 FEET TO THE EAVES, RIGHT?
>> SO THIS BUILDING IS NOT EVE AS TALL AS A NORMAL SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE WOULD BE.
>> I DID -- THIS IS ACTUALLY ACROSS THE STREET FROM MY FIRE STATION. THAT'S 50 BY 80 BY 18, JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. AND I TOURED THAT WHEN THEY WERE BUILDING IT. SO THAT KIND OF GAVE ME AN IDEA OF WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, HOW MUCH SPACE IS INSIDE THAT ACTUAL SIZE BUILDING. AND HONESTLY, THAT'S AS BIG AS I CAN AFFORD. I MEAN, I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE EVEN BIGGER, BUT YOU KNOW, IT'S --
>> DOESN'T LOOK LIKE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A WHOLE BUNCH OF PEOPLE DRIVING BY CHECKING IT OUT BACK WHERE YOU ARE.
>> I'M AT A DEAD END. SO I DON'T GET TRAFFIC ON MY
ROAD. >> YOU HAVE SONS, TWO BOYS?
>> TWO BOYS. THEY'RE A YEAR AND A HALF AND 2 1/2.
>> YEAH, I GUESS MY -- IT'S IN A -- ON A VERY LARGE PROPERTY AT THE END OF THE ROAD VERY MUCH. AND SEPARATED FROM ANY - - A LOT OF SEPARATION FROM ANYTHING ELSE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS FAR AS HOMES. SO I THINK IT MIGHT BE ONE OF THOSE UNUSUAL SITUATIONS WHERE SOMETHING LIKE THIS WOULD PROBABLY BE -- WORK WELL. I GUESS MY OTHER QUESTION IS WILL YOU NEED TO COME BACK FOR A SPECIAL USE FOR THE CATTLE YOU WANT TO ADD OR NOT?
>> I MEAN, I'M OPEN RURAL. SO I DON'T --
I DON'T KNOW WHETHER THE CODE ALLOWS THAT OR
NOT. >> I MEAN, ACCORDING TO WHAT I'VE READ IN THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT CODE, OPEN RURAL YOU CAN HAVE AGRICULTURAL, YOU CAN HAVE RESIDENTIAL, YOU CAN ALMOST DO ANYTHING YOU WANT EXCEPT BUILD A BUILDING THIS SIZE.
>> OKAY. THEN I GUESS THERE WILL BE NO COMMERCIAL USE OF THE PROPERTY.
>> NO, SIR. IT'S JUST FOR MY STUFF AND FOR ME TO MAINTAIN MY CARS AND THAT KIND OF STUFF INSIDE THE BUILDING. THAT'S IT.
>> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION IF EVERYONE'S READY.
>> I WOULD NEED TO ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT FIRST.
IS THERE ANYONE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 5? YES, SIR.
>> MY NAME IS RICHARD NEWTON. I LIVE AT 337 LURES LANE. I'M ALEX'S NEIGHBOR ON HIS WEST SIDE.
HE IS ON MY EAST SIDE. I HAVE LIVED ON MY PROPERTY
[00:55:01]
THIS DECEMBER FOR 53 YEARS. RAISED BOTH MY DAUGHTERS.STILL FEED THE DEER IN THE DRIVEWAY.
TO THE POINT LAST WEDNESDAY ONE OF OUR DOES SHOWED UP WITH TWIN FAWNS. THEY SHOWED UP YESTERDAY AT 4:15 IN THE AFTERNOON. I NORMALLY FEED THEM AT 5:00. MY WIFE SAID I GUESS YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO CHANGE THE FEEDING TIME. BUT ALEX AND HIS FAMILY, TWO BOYS, GREAT NEIGHBORS. I FULLY SUPPORT ANYTHING ALEX WOULD WANT TO DO, WHETHER IT'S BEHIND HIS HOME, BESIDE HIS HOME. I LOOK FORWARD TO HIM RAISING HIS BOYS WHERE HE WANTS. I HOPE THE BOARD WILL APPROVE HIS VARIANCE.
THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
2140 QUARTER HORSE CIRCLE NORTH, ST. JOHNS, FLORIDA.
ALEX'S MOTHER. AND I OWN THE PROPERTY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF HIM. AND I FULLY APPROVE -- OR I MEAN I FULLY AGREE. BUT HE GREW UP -- I MEAN, MY HUSBAND AND I, THE CARS AND THE MOTORCYCLES, AND WE RAISED COWS THERE OFF OF QUARTER HORSE BEFORE IT GOT SO DEVELOPED AND ALL OF THAT. AND I THINK HE WANTS TO DO HE SAME THING WITH HIS CHILDREN, UNTIL WE LOST MY HUSBAND IN 2013.
THAT'S ALL I HAD TO SAY. THANK YOU.
>> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ANYONE ELSE? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE WE'RE BACK INTO THE MOTION. MR. LABANOWSKI.
>> I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ZONE VARIANCE 2025- 10 FOR 341 LURES LANE BASED ON SIX FINDINGS OF FACT AND SIX CONDITIONS AS PROVIDED BY THE
STAFF. >> WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. IS THERE A SECOND?
>> ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE. SOMEONE HAS NOT VOTED YET.
OH, OKAY. THAT MOTION PASSES 6-1.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. KIMMEL. ALL RIGHT.
[6. REZ 2025-06 RaceTrac at Dixie Highway. Request to rezone approximately eight (8) acres of land from Open Rural (OR) and Commercial Intensive (CI) with conditions to Commercial Highway and Tourist (CHT) with conditions, located at the southwestern corner of County Road 204 and Highway US 1 South intersection.]
ON ITEM NUMBER 6 IS THERE ANY EX PARTE? MISS SPIEGEL.>> YES, I DID A SITE VISIT AND I HAD TWO PHONE CONVERSATIONS WITH COURTNEY GAVER AND A PHONE CONVERSATION WITH JEN LUMBRICK FROM RIVER KEEPERS.
>> I VISITED THE SITE ON THE 15TH AND SPOKE WITH MISS GRAVES. OH, I VISITED ON THE 16TH. SPOKE WITH MISS GRAVES ON THE 15TH.
>> I HAD A PHONE CALL WITH MISS GAVER AND WE DISCUSSED THE MERITS OF THE APPLICATION LAST WEEK, I BELIEVE.
>> WELL, I HAD A PHONE CALL AND IT STARTED HEY, THIS IS COURTNEY, HOW ARE YOU DOING? IT'S BEEN A WHILE.
SO I THOUGHT THIS IS -- I DIDN'T RECOGNIZE THE NUMBER.
I THOUGHT IT WAS A SPAM CALL. SO I DELETED IT. AND NOW THAT I SEE YOUR NAME HERE, I FIGURE IT WAS YOU.
>> YES. I ALSO HAD A CONVERSATION AND I DID A SITE VISIT.
>> AND I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH YOU ON FRIDAY OF LAST WEEK ABOUT THE APPLICATION.
>> AWESOME. GOOD AFTERNOON. THROUGH THE CHAIR, COURTNEY GAVER WITH ROGERS TOWERS, 110 WHETSTONE PLACE ST. AUGUSTINE 30826. I REPRESENT THE APPLICANT AND CONTRACT PURCHASER RACETRAC INC.
WHO'S UNDER CONTRACT TO PURCHASE THIS PROPERTY FROM THE OWNER, EXTREME FW INVESTMENTS LLC.
WE DO HAVE THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, SAMANTHA JONES FROM RACETRAC HERE. SHE'S BACK IN THE BACK.
WE ALSO HAVE OUR PROJECT ENGINEER WITH PRIME AE AS WELL AS OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER CHRIS WALSH WITH WALSH TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. SO THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ABOUT A HALF A MILE FROM THE ST. JOHNS COUNTY LINE WAY DOWN PAST FAVER DYKES JUST UNDER THE INTERSTATE. IF YOU'VE LIVED IN ST. AUGUSTINE FOR A LONG TIME, YOU'LL PROBABLY REMEMBER ABOUT 20 YEARS AGO, THIS USED TO BE A TRUCK STOP CALLED CHARLIE T'S. THOSE BUILDINGS HAVE BEEN LONG GONE ALTHOUGH IF YOU DID A SITE VISIT AND WALKED AROUND YOU PROBABLY SAW THERE ARE STILL SOME OF THE FOUNDATIONS LEFT OVER FROM THAT CHARLIE T'S TRUCK STOP. SO I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT THE ZONING IN A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE IT'S SPLIT ZONING. AND IT'S EIGHT ACRES THAT WE'RE ASKING TO BE REZONED. BUT JUST FOR A MOMENT, THE PORTION OF THE PROPERTY BEING REZONED AS WELL AS THE REST OF THE PROPERTY THE OWNER OWNS AND THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY IS ALL IN THE MIXED USE LAND USE DESIGNATION ON THE 2025 COMP PLAN, FUTURE LAND USE MAP. OKAY.
[01:00:01]
SO I'M GOING TO TRY TO MAKE THIS MAKE SENSE. SO THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS SPLIT ZONING. SO THE OWNER RIGHT NOW OWNS WHAT YOU SEE OUTLINED IN RED. AND THAT'S JUST A LITTLE BIT OVER 20 ACRES. AND SO OF THAT RACETRAC IS GOING TO BE PURCHASING ALMOST 17 ACRES OF THAT LAND.THE PROPERTY CURRENTLY HAS THE NORTHEAST CORNER IS ALREADY ZONED CHT. YOU'LL SEE A MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY IS ALSO CI WITH CONDITIONS.
AND THEN THERE'S A PORTION OF OR. SO THERE'S AN UPLAND PORTION OF OR ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE SITE AND THEN THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE SITE IS THE ORS BEING THE WETLANDS. SO ON HERE THIS GIVES A BETTER IDEA. SO WHAT WE'RE CIRCLING IN RED ON THAT RIGHT SIDE OF THE SCREEN IS WHAT IS SUBJECT TO THIS REZONING APPLICATION.
SO YOU'LL SEE WE'RE BASICALLY BRINGING IN ABOUT 2 1/2 ACRES OF OR AS WELL ASED CI THAT'S REMAINING ON THE OWNER'S PROPERTY. WE'RE BRINGING ALL OF THAT INTO CHT. AND SO THE REMAINDER OF THAT OR IS ABOUT AN ACRE AND THAT PROPERTY AS WELL AS A LITTLE BIT OF THE CI, THAT WILL BE RETAINED BY THE SELLER FOR FUTURE USE AT SOME POINT. SO THIS IS A CONVENTIONAL REZONING, BUT WE DID SUBMIT A SITE PLAN. THIS IS THE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN. AGAIN, OVERALL THE SITE THAT RACETRAC, THE PROPERTY THAT RACETRAC'S PURCHASING AND WILL BE DEVELOPING IS ABOUT 17 ACRES. THAT DOESN'T -- THAT INCLUDES THE WETLANDS, NONE OF WHICH ARE BEING DISTURBED.
THIS IS A SINGLE USER. SO IT'S GOING TO BE A GAS STATION, WHICH IS ABOUT 8100 SQUARE FEET.
CONVENIENCE STORE WITH ASSOCIATED PARKING.
THE SITE WILL HAVE MULTIPLE FUELING STATIONS.
YOU CAN SEE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER WE HAVE THE FUELING STATIONS FOR YOUR TYPICAL PASSENGER AUTOMOBILES AS WELL AS FURTHER TO THE SOUTH NEAR THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY THOSE WILL BE FOR THE DIESEL HIGH-FLOW FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLES AND SEMIS. WE DID DO A TREE SURVEY AND THERE IS A 42-INCH LAUREL OAK ON THE ITE WHICH IS A SPECIMEN TREE AND IT IS BEING PRESERVED.
YOU CAN SEE IT, THE CANOPY AND THE TREE IS RIGHT THERE WHEREWHERE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY. THAT'S A DRY RETENTION POND BUT THAT'S WHERE THE OAK WILL BE AND WE WILL BE PRESERVING THAT ALL THE WAY TO THE DRIP LINE, EVERYTHING THAT THE CODE REQUIRES WITH THAT. SO AGAIN, THE ENTIRETY OF THE WETLANDS, THOSE ARE NOT SUBJECT TO THE REZONING. THOSE ARE NOT BEING TOUCHED.
WE WILL BE COMPLYING WITH THE COUNTY AND ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT UPLAND BUFFER. IT'S A MANAGED 25- FOOT BUFFER.
IT CAN'T BE LESS THAN 15 FEET. THERE ARE AREAS HERE THAT ARE AS WIDE AS 70 TO 90 FEET. AND THEN ALSO THERE'S A 25- FOOT BUILDING SETBACK WHICH THE CODE REQUIRES. SO ANOTHER UNIQUE THING ABOUT THIS SITE IS THAT WE'RE OVER SIX MILES AWAY FROM WATER AND SEWER.
AND SO THIS WOULD BE A SEPTIC AND WELL. AND I'M HAPPY TO TALK ABOUT THAT. BUT ULTIMATELY AT THE END OF THE DAY WE HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE STATE AND COUNTY REGULATIONS FOR THOSE AS WELL AS EVERYTHING THAT THE FIRE MARSHAL'S GOING TO REQUIRE WITH IT BEING A WELL. SO ON THIS SECTION IF YOU LOOK THIS JUST SHOWS ISOLATED OF THE PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY OF THAT SITE PLAN, THAT EIGHT ACRES THAT ARE REQUESTING BEING MOVED INTO CHT.
AND A LITTLE BIT ABOUT TRAFFIC. SO THE TOP CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN IS THE 204 -- COUNTY ROAD 204 AND YOU CAN SEE THE NORTH ARROWS TO THE BOTTOM.
THAT'S LIKE IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT A GOD'S EYE VIEW OF 204. AND THEN THE BOTTOM IS WHAT WE EXPECT FDOT IS GOING TO REQUIRE.
SO RIGHT NOW DRIVERS THAT ARE TURNING LEFT FROM COUNTY ROAD 204 THAT ARE GOING NORTHBOUND ON U.S. 1 LIKE BACK INTO TOWN, THEY JUST HAVE A STOP SIGN THERE THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO WAIT AND THEN THERE'S A MEDIAN WHERE THEY CAN TURN LEFT AND HEAD BACK NORTH. SO WHAT WE'RE EXPECTING FDOT TO REQUIRE, OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEER HAS BEEN SPEAKING WITH THE COUNTY'S ENGINEERS AS WELL AS FDOT FOR MANY MONTHS. SO WE EXPECT THAT FDOT IS GOING TO REQUIRE SOMETHING CALLED A SIGNALIZED R CUT. THAT MEANS IF YOU'RE DRIVING EAST ON COUNTY ROAD 204 BACK TO U.S. 1 AND YOU WANT TO -- RIGHT NOW YOU COULD TURN LEFT AND GO NORTH. YOU'RE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO TURN RIGHT AND THEN GO DOWN TO A SIGNALIZED BASICALLY U-TURN. AND SO WE WOULD ALSO -- SO BASICALLY YOU WOULD TURN RIGHT, THERE WOULD BE A SIGNALIZED R CUT AND THEN YOU COULD TURN LEFT. SO BASICALLY NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC ON U.S. 1 WOULD BE STOPPED SO YOU COULD DO THAT U-TURN. FURTHER SOUTH ON THE SITE WHERE WE ALSO HAVE INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM THE PROPERTY BACK TO U.S.
1 WE WILL BE ADDING A RIGHT TURN LANE FROM SOUTHBOUND U.S. 1 INTO THE PROPERTY.
DRIVERS THAT ARE COMING OUT ON THAT -- FROM THAT AREA OF THE SITE WOULD BE ABLE TO EITHER TURN LEFT THROUGH THE R
[01:05:03]
CUT BACK TO HEAD NORTH OR TURN RIGHT.ONE OF THE THINGS THAT DID COME UP WHEN WE WERE TALKING TO NEIGHBORS ABOUT THIS WAS, YOU KNOW, WHY ISN'T THERE GOING TO BE A TRAFFIC SIGNAL OR WILL WE BE PUTTING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL IN AT COUNTY ROAD 204 AND US1. FDOT HAS ESSENTIALLY TOLD US RIGHT NOW YOU'RE NOT GETTING A TRAFFIC SIGNAL THERE JUST BECAUSEIT'S LESS THAN A QUARTER OF A MILE TO THE INTERSECTION WITH I- 95 AND WITH QUEUEING AT A RED LIGHT THAT COULD CREATE AN ISSUE. SO THE R CUT IS WHAT WE EXPECT.
AND MR. WALSH CAN TALK MORE ABOUT THAT.
AT THE END OF THE DAY, YOU KNOW, WHATEVER FDOT'S GOING TO REQUIRE IS WHAT WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO MEET. SO HERE ARE SOME PICTURES OF -- THIS ISN'T EXACTLY THE SAME TYPE OF SITE BUT SIMILAR.
WHERE YOU SEE THERE'S THE PASSENGER AUTOMOBILE, FUEL PUMP ISLANDS AND THE COMMERCIAL. RACETRAC RIGHT NOW, YOU KNOW, HAS FIVE LOCATIONS IN THE COUNTY. THIS WOULD BE THEIR SIXTH LOCATION. THIS STORE IS ANTICIPATED TO CREATE 35 FULL- TIME JOBS ONCE IT OPENS.
AND AS THIS MARKET GROWS THERE WOULD BE ADDITIONAL PART- TIME POSITIONS AVAILABLE.
ONE MORE PHOTO FOR YOU. ONE THING I DIDN'T MENTION EARLIER IS AS PART OF THE CI ZONING THAT'S EXISTED ON THE PROPERTY SINCE 2018 THERE WERE SOME CONDITIONS, ONE OF WHICH IS THE WETLANDS, WE WORK WITH THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT TO HAVE THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT ON THERE. THAT CONDITION IS NOT CHANGING.
WE'VE AGREED TO THAT CONDITION AS WELL AS THE WAIVER OF THE LIVE LOCAL ACT. STAFF HAS GIVEN YOU FOUR FINDINGS OF FACTS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. AND SO AGAIN, I WOULD JUST SUMMARIZE AND SAY THE RACETRAC IS AN ALLOWABLE USE RIGHT NOW WITHIN THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY THAT HAS A CHT AND CI ZONING. WE'RE PULLING IN THE 2 1/2 ACRES OF OR INTO THE CHT AND WE'RE BASICALLY BRINGING THE CI WITH CONDITIONS INTO THE CHT AS WELL.
SO THIS WILL RESTORE A GAS STATION AT THE INTERCHANGE OF I-95. THIS IS IN AN AREA THAT HASN'T SEEN UPDATES OR DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE IN A REALLY LONG TIME OR, YOU KNOW, UPGRADES TO THE EXISTING FACILITIES THAT ARE THERE. WE DO -- AGAIN, WE'RE PRESERVING THE WETLANDS.
WE ARE MEETING -- THE SITE PLAN WILL BE MEETING ALL OF THE CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR CHT AS WELL AS 2025 COMP PLAN AND WE'RE COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING SURROUNDING NEIGHBORS. AND SO WITH THAT WE'LL STAND BY FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY HAVE.
>> THANK YOU, COURTFULLY.COURTNE Y.
>> OKAY. WELL, FIRST OF ALL, WHEN WE'RE DONE I WOULD LIKE MR. WALSH TO TELL ME WHICH ONE IS THE SIGNALIZED R CUT. I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHAT THAT IS. I THINK I GOT IT. BUT I'M NOT 100% SURE.
OKAY. ON THE SEPTIC. I WAS LOOKING FOR A LETTER FROM THE WATER MANAGEMENT -- I MEAN FROM THE UTILITIES PEOPLE AND I DIDN'T SEE IT.
IT MIGHT BE IN HERE. HOW MUCH ACTUALLY DOES A PRODUCT LIKE THIS NEED? HOW MUCH SEPTIC DOES IT NEED? BECAUSE I KNOW WHEN YOU SAID SINGLE FAMILY BUT YOU'VE GOT INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE COMING IN.
>> SO -- BETH, WOULD YOU BE ABLE TO SPEAK TO THAT? OR SAMANTHA? I'M CALLING UP OUR ENGINEERS.
SO I KNOW FOR THE SEPTIC THERE ARE SPECIFIC SETBACKS WE HAVE TO HAVE FOR THE WETLANDS AND THE BIG THING WITH THE WELL WOULD BE WHAT THE FIRE MARSHAL IS REQUIRING FOR US. I DO THINK THAT CONVENIENCE STORE -- AND I'LL LET THE ENGINEERS CONFIRM. IS A PRETTY LOW- END
USER. >> THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I WAS THINKING. AND I WAS THINKING ALSO ABOUT THE CAPACITY. I KNOW THEY HAVE TO HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF PRESSURE FOR TWO HOURS, RIGHT? OKAY.
MY NAME'S SAMANTHA JONES WITH RACETRAC. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION SPECIFICALLY ON THE SEPTIC, WE'RE ABOUT 2,700 GALLONS PER DAY BASED ON AVERAGE FLOWS FOR THIS STORE TYPE. OTHER STORES THAT WE HAVE IN FLORIDA ON SEPTIC, I BELIEVE THE CLOSEST IS BRADFORD COUNTY.
WE LIKE TO INSTALL A SYSTEM CALLED GEOMATRIC SYSTEM THAT'S PROPRIETARY AND ALLOWED IN THE STATE THAT ALLOWS A SEPTIC FIELD TO BE OVERSIZED AND CERTAIN FIELDS TO REST AND INFILTRATE MORE EFFICIENTLY. AND THAT'S WHAT WE'D BE PROPOSING HERE.
>> THAT'S GOOD. I HAD SPOKE NGUYEN JEN LUNDBERG ABOUT THIS, ABOUT THE OLD TANKS IN THERE, ABOUT THE PREVIOUS USE, AND ABOUT YOU PRESERVING THE TREE AND THE CONSERVATION AREA AND NO WETLAND IMPACT AND SHE'S LIKE WELL, IT'S CHECKING OFF BOXES FOR ME. AND YOU KNOW THAT'S JEN WITH MATANZAS RIVER KEEPER. I THINK THAT'S PRETTY GENEROUS OF HER TO SAY. I DO APPRECIATE THAT.
SIGNALIZED R CUT. CAN YOU JUST SHOW ME WHICH ONE THAT WAS? I SAW TWO DIFFERENT SIGNALIZED TURNS AND ONE NON- SIGNALIZED TURN OFF OF US1.
>> CHRIS WALSH, WALSH TRAFFIC, 285 PALMETTO SPRING STREET DEBERRY. THE SIGNALIZED R CUT, THE BOTTOM IS KIND OF A BETTER DEPICTION OF WHAT'S HAPPENING THERE.
[01:10:02]
SO IN ESSENCE IF YOU'RE COMING FROM COUNTY ROAD 204 GOING EASTBOUND TODAY YOU HAVE A STOP SIGN AND YOU CAN MAKE A LEFT TO GO BACK TO THE INTERCHANGE, TO I-95.THEY WILL RESTRICT THAT LEFT TURN MOVEMENT.
SO YOU'LL HAVE TO GO RIGHT TO GO SOUTH ON US1. FOLLOWING THE RED DOTTED LINE THEN YOU'D COME AND DO A U TURN AT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL.
SO THEY'LL STOP NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC WHERE THAT SIGNAL IS ON THE BOTTOM LEFT- HAND CORNER OF THAT DIAGRAM. SO YOU CAN MAKE A U-TURN THAT'S PROTECTED AND THEN GO BACK TO THE NORTH.
>> SO THIS IS GOING TO CHANGE THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC ON 204?
>> YES. AND LIKE I SAID, THAT INTERSECTION'S 900 FEET ABAP THE DOT MINIMUM SPACING FOR I ASIGNAL IS ABOUT HALF A MILE.
>> THEY DON'T LIKE SIGNALS REALLY VERY MUCH AT ALL ANYMORE.
>> ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
>> COURTNEY, I THINK YOUR SCOPE AND SCALE OF THE DEVELOPMENT IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA.
>> CONCERNING THE CONSERVATIONCONSERVATION OVER CRACKER BRANCH. WHAT IF THE ST. JOHNS WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT SAYS NO TO ACCEPTING THE CONSERVATION
EASEMENT? >> SO RIGHT NOW THE WAY THE CONDITION IS STATED IS THAT IT WOULD BE A CONDITION OF US GETTING CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL.
SO IF THEY ARE TO SAY NO I WOULDN'T EXPECT THAT RACETRAC WOULD BE IMPACTING THOSE WETLANDS. THAT'S JUST NOT THE DESIGN THAT WOULD REQUIRE MITIGATION OFF-SITE WHICH AS YOU FLOW IS QUITE EXPENSIVE AND THOSE CREDITS REALLY AREN'T AVAILABLE.
SO. >> SO THERE'S NO WAY -- LET ME ASK THE COUNTY ATTORNEY JACOB, IS THERE ANY WAY THE COUNTY COULD ACCEPT A CONSERVATION EASEMENT OVER THOSE WETLANDS?
>> FOR THE RECORD JACOB SMITH WITH GROWTH MANAGEMENT.
REALISTICALLY IT'S A POSSIBILITY. AGAIN, THIS LANGUAGE IS GENERALLY MIRRORING WHAT EXISTS FOR THIS ZONING DESIGNATION RIGHT NOW.
IT'S ALSO POSSIBLE FOR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO CONSIDER ACCEPTING IT OR ADDING AN ADDITIONAL CONDITION OR A MODIFIED CONDITION IN THE CASE THAT THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT DIDN'T CHOOSE TO ACCEPT IT.
>> OKAY. COURTNEY, YOU HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE FOLKS AT THE ST. JOHNS
I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS WOULD BE IF WE'RE CHANGING THE CONDITION TO SAY THE COUNTY WOULD ACCEPT IT I WOULD PREFER -- AND I KNOW I'M KIND OF SPINNING THIS OFF ON THE FLOOR. THAT INSTEAD OF IT BEING A CONDITION FOR CONSTRUCTION PLAN APPROVAL IT WOULD BE A CONDITION FOR THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. SO BASICALLY, IF WE KNOW THE COUNTY IS GOING TO BE THE ONE ACCEPTING IT THAT WE WOULDN'T BE HELD UP WHILE THE COUNTY IS REVIEWING THOSE LEGAL DOCUMENTS AND THAT THEY COULD START SHOVELS IN THE GROUND AND BEFORE THEY GET THEIR CO THAT THEY ARE ABLE TO GET THAT EASEMENT IN PLACE. SO THAT WOULD BE MY REQUEST.
BUT CERTAINLY THAT'S ACCEPTABLE TO THE APPLICANT.
>> I HAVE A COUPLE QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO THE TRAFFIC. YOU'VE GOT THE U- TURN COMING OUT OF 204 TO MAKE THE U- TURN ON 1 TO GO NORTH. YOU ALSO HAVE A LIGHT THAT'S SHOWN HERE THAT COMES OUT OF WHERE THE TRUCKS WILL BE COMING OUT OF, A LIGHT THERE. HAS THAT ALREADY BEEN TRIGGERED
>> WE'VE COORDINATED WITH THEM, AND SO UP TO THIS POINT THEY'RE AGREEABLE TO HAVING BOTH OF THOSE LOCATIONS HAVING THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL.
BUT THEY WOULD FUNCTION TOGETHER AS ONE SYSTEM.
>> SO THAT'S IN PLACE RIGHT NOW?
>> PHYSICALLY IT'S NOT IN PLACE BUT THE AUTHORIZATION BY FDOT IS THERE.
>> THEY'VE SIGNED OFF ON THE FORM THAT APPROVES THAT CONFIGURATION WITH THE SIGNAL. CORRECT.
>> OKAY. MY CONCERN WAS THE TRUCK TRAFFIC COMING OUT OF THERE, THAT AREA'S GOING TO BE GROWING FROM LOOKING AT THE SURROUNDING AREA AND I DON'T WANT TO HAVE ANYTHING HAPPEN LIKE IS UP ON 210 RIGHT NOW.
>> YES. EXCUSE ME FOR BEING INCORRECT ABOUT YOUR NAME EARLIER ON.
>> JUST A QUICK QUESTION OUT OF CURIOSITY. I MEAN, I THINK IT'S A VERY LOGICAL THING TO HAPPEN AT THIS INTERCHANGE. WILL THERE BE ANY EV CHARGERS INCORPORATED INTO THE
DEVELOPMENT? >> LET'S SEE WHAT -- I'M NOT SURE. LET'S SEE WHAT RACETRAC SAYS ABOUT THAT.
>> WE ARE NOT PROPOSING ANY EV AT THIS TIME.
IT'S OBVIOUSLY BEEN A CHANGING MARKET BOTH FROM A HARDWARE PERSPECTIVE AND POLITICALLY.
SO WHILE WE DO HAVE A PROPRIETARY NETWORK THAT WE'RE STARTING TO BUILD OUT, IT IS NOT PROPOSED HERE.
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 6? SEEING NONE, WE'RE BACK -- YES. YES, SIR.
[01:15:01]
>> GOOD AFTERNOON. EDWARD GRIFFIN, 444GIANNA WAY IN ST. AUGUST YOOEB. THESE ARE MORE CLARIFICATION QUESTIONS. I KNOW THE CHARLIE TS TRUCK STOP HAS LAID VACANT FOR A LONG TIME DUE TO CONTAMINATION FROM THE PREVIOUS GAS STATION. HAS THE DEP CLEARED THIS LAND OR ARE THEY ALLOWED TO REBUILD A GAS STATION BECAUSE THERE'S GAS STATION CONTAMINATION THERE ALREADY? MY OTHER QUESTION IS I KNOWKNOW HOLDINGS OWNS THE LAND AT THE MOMENT. THEY ALSO OWN EXTREME FIREWORKS. IF THEY'RE PLANNING ON USING THE OTHER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, ARE THEY GOING TO PUT A FIREWORKS WAREHOUSE NEXT TO A LARGE GAS STATION? WHICH LEADS TO MY THIRD QUESTION. WHERE IS THE NEAREST FIRE
STATION? >> WHERE IS THE NEAREST FIRE
>> COURTNEY WILL BE ABLE TO ANSWER THOSE QUESTIONS.
LET ME JUST SEE IF THERE'S ANYBODY ELSE THAT HAS ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FROM PUBLIC COMMENT.
ALL RIGHT. COURTNEY, GO AHEAD.
>> SO MISS JONES WITH RACETRAC IS CHECKING.
BUT THEY HAVE DONE A PHASE 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, POTENTIALLY - - I DON'T THINK IT WAS TRIGGERED A PHASE 2.
BUT SHE'S CHECKING ON THAT. WE'RE NOT AWARE OF ANYTHING WITH FDP THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN CONTAMINATEED. THAT WOULD HAVE COME UP THROUGH THE PHASE 1ESA AND WE HAVE TO DO ANYTHING FOR REGULATORY PURPOSES TO CLEAN IT UP. BUT WE'RE NOT AWARE OF THAT. I THINK THE SECOND QUESTION WAS ABOUT THE FIREWORKS? IS THAT RIGHT? OKAY, YEAH. SO ORIGINALLY WHEN WE STARTED OUR PREAPP WE WERE -- THE OWNER WAS PROPOSING THAT THEY COME IN WITH BASICALLY A PLAN UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITH THAT. AS MANY OF YOU MAY KNOW THAT FIREWORKS, THE SALE OF FIREWORKS IS HEAVILY REGULATED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA.
AND BECAUSE THIS IS WELL AND SEPTIC THE TYPESTYPES BASICALLY WATER HOLDING TANKS YOU WOULD HAVE TO HAVE FOR THAT TYPE OF USE WOULD BE COST PROHIBITIVE. SO RIGHT NOW I DON'T KNOW -- I DON'T REPRESENT THE OWNER. SO I DON'T KNOW WHA THEIR PLAN IS. BUT CERTAINLY THAT WAS ORIGINALLY FLOATED AND QUICKLY TAKEN OFF THE TABLE.
>> OH, YEAH. SO I DON'T KNOW WHERE THE CLOSE YFT FIRE EST FIRE STATION IS. I KNOW WE'RE OVER A HALF MILE AWAY FROM THE CLOSE YOST ONE.
SO AS PART OF THAT THE FIRE MARSHAL IS GOING TO REQUIRE EITHER ONE OF TWO THINGS.
EITHER WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROTECT THE BUILDING WITH THE VERY SPECIFIC NFPA13 AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLERS AND ALSO PROVIDE AN ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY, A FIRE PUMP, OR WE'RE BASICALLY GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A PRESSURIZED FIRE HYDRANT SYSTEM, AND THAT WOULD REQUIRE 2,500 GALLONS PER MINUTE FOR TWO HOURS. AND WE ALREADY KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE FIRE MARSHAL'S GOING TO REQUIRE FOR THAT.
>> DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YOU, COURTNEY.
WE'RE BACK INTO THE AGENCY FOR A MOTION. MISS SPIEGEL.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE -- RECOMMEND APPROVAL, EXCUSE ME, OF REZ 2025- 06 RACETRAC AT DIXIE HIGHWAY BASED ON FOUR FINDINGS OF FACT AS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT. DID WE WANT TO ADD ANYTHING ABOUT THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT?
>> IT'S YOUR MOTION. I THINK YOU LET BCC HANDLE
IT. >> YEAH, I THINK IT'S GOOD. I THINK WE'VE DISCUSSED IT.
>> OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. IS THERE A SECOND? SECOND.
ANY DISCUSSION? SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE.
[7. CPA (SS) 2025-06 Elam Family Legacy. Request for a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Future Land Use Map designation of approximately 5.74 acres of land from Rural/Silviculture (R/S) to Residential-A (Res-A), with a site-specific Text Amendment limiting the number of residential uses allowed on the subject property to a maximum four (4) single-family residential dwelling units, located on Pine Island Road.]
ALL RIGHT. THAT MOTION PASSES 7-0.THANK YOU. ON TO ITEM NUMBER 7.
IS THERE ANY EX PARTE? YOU'RE RIGHT.
YOU'RE RIGHT. WOULD THE APPLICANT PLEASE COME FORWARD?
>> HELLO. ROB MATTHEWS, MATTHEWS DCCM, 7 WALDO STREET, ST. AUGUSTINE.
GOOD AFTERNOON. TODAY WE'RE HERE TO REPRESENT THE ELAM FAMILY. THEY CURRENTLY HAVE 5.
73 ACRES OFF PINE ISLAND ROAD.
THIS APPLICATION IS FOR A SMALL- SCALE COMP PLAN AMENDMENT. AND THE CURRENT LAND IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL LAND, AND THE DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY IS LIMITED TO ONE SINGLE- FAMILY FAMILY UNIT.
IT'S AN EXEMPT PARCEL THAT'S RURAL SILVICULTURE.
WE'RE HERE TO CHANGE THAT FUTURE LAND USE TO ALLOW TO ADD ADDITIONAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS. THE INTENT OF THE PROPERTY IS TO AS A FAMILY COMPOUND. MR. ELAM IS HERE. HE'D LIKE TO HAVE THE PROPERTY
[01:20:02]
TO BE USE FORD HIS TWO CHILDREN AND A POTENTIAL FUTURE FOURTH SPOT FOR HIS AGING IN-LAWS. SO CURRENTLY THE LAND USE IS SHOWN AS RURAL SILVICULTURE AND THE ZONING IS OR. WE'D LIKE TO DO A TEXT AMENDMENT SO IF THE LAND USE WENT THROUGH IT WOULD ALLOW FOR ONE UNIT PER ACRE WITH IT BEING 5. 74 THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR FIVE UNITS. SO THEY'D LIKE TO LIMIT IT TO A TOTAL OF FOUR UNITS JUST FOR THE FAMILY MEMBERS.AS YOU CAN SEE THE FUTURE LAND USE AROUND THE PROPERTY, YOU'VE GOT RESIDENTIAL A ACROSS THE STREET THAT IS BASICALLY THE SAME TYPE USE. YOU HAVE TO THE EAST RURAL COMMERCIAL THAT WAS JUST RECENTLY APPROVED.
AND THEN TO THE SOUTH YOU HAVE RESIDENTIAL B.
AND RURAL SILVICULTURE TO THE WEST.
AND THIS ONE WOULD BE MODIFIED. SO AS YOU CAN SEE, THIS IS THE PROPOSED LOT PLAN FOR THE FOUR UNITS. LOT 4 IS ACTUALLY, BECAUSE THE ALLOWANCE IS TO BUILD ONE RESIDENTIAL UNIT, THAT'S WHERE MR. ELAM PLANS TO BUILD HIS HOUSE. LOT 1 AND 2 WOULD BE FOR HIS CHILDREN AND LOT 3 WOULD BE THE FUTURE ONE FOR HIS IN-LAWS.
>> THE RESIDENTIAL A WOULD PERMIT FIVE LOTS BUT THEY WANT TO DO PERMIT FORFOR FOUR AND THAT WOULD ALLOW FOR DENSITY OF .7 UNITS PER ACRE. WE BELIEVE THIS IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING RURAL AND RESIDENTIAL CONSERVATION USES.
IT PROTECTS THE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THIS UNIQUE AREA. AND IT'S A VERY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT AND DOES NOT PROMOTE URBAN SPRAWL. IT'S GOT VERY NEGLIGIBLE IMPACT ON TRAFFIC, UTILITIES AND THE ENVIRONMNT. AND THE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING RURAL AREA.
QUESTIONS. >> I THINK WE MIGHT HAVE A FEW.
>> THERE ARE NO UTILITIES THAT ARE CLOSE BY.
SO IT WOULD BE SERVED BY WELL AND SEPTIC.
>> THAT'S WHAT I FIGURED. OKAY.
>> JUST A QUICK QUESTION. I DID DO A SITE VISIT UP THERE.
RED FLAGS THAT ARE OUT THERE, THAT'S THE ROUGH LAYOUT OF THE LOTS ITSELF?
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? WE'LL ASK FOR PUBLIC COMMENT.
>> THANK YOU. >> IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 7?
MY NAME IS LIZA GROSHE WILL. L AND I AM THE OTHERED JACHBT PROPERTY OWNER AT 1055 PINE ISLAND ROAD.
MY FAMILY ALSO OWNS 1257 PINE ISLAND ROAD AT THE END, THE OLD FISH CAMP. I HAVE NOT HAD THE PLEASURE OF MEETING MY NEIGHBOR YET, MR. ELAM. SOME OF THE OTHER NEIGHBORS HAVE. A LITTLE BACKSTORY ON PINE ISLAND ROAD AND THE FAMILIES THAT LIVE OUT THERE, THERE ARE LITERALLY WITH MR. ELAM FIVE INDIVIDUAL FAMILIES THAT ARE LIVING AT THE END OF THAT DIRT ROAD. TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, THERE ARE NO UTILITIES. THERE'S NO WI-FI.
SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A PRETTY SPECIAL PART OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY THAT'S REALLY BEEN SURROUNDED AND IMPACTED BY A LOT OF URBAN SPRAWL.
THE NEW SCHOOL THOUGH A REALLY WONDERFUL ADDITION TO THE AREA OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY HAS REALLY CREATED A BIG IMPACT ON US ON PINE ISLAND ROAD.
WHEN I FIRST HEARD OF MR. ELAM AND HIS INTENT TO HAVE A PROPERTY AS A FAMILY COMPOUND, IT ALL SOUNDED WELL AND GOOD. HOWEVER, WHEN I SAW THE DRAWING, IT LOOKS LIKE A SUBDIVISION, AND WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS AS TO WHAT HE COULD POTENTIALLY DO WITH THOSE FOUR LOTS IT LOOKS LIKE A LITTLE MINI CUL-DE- SAC TO ME. AND THOUGH YOU ALWAYS WANT TO HAVE THE BEST INTENTIONS WITH PEOPLE AND GIVE THEM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT, I HAVE SEEN VERY QUICK MOVEMENT ON THIS PROPERTY.
THE PREVIOUS OWNER CLEARED IT WITHOUT -- WITHOUT GETTING THE PROPER PERMITTING TO BEGIN WITH, CREATING A NIGHTMARE FOR MR. ELAM AND HIS FAMILY, I'M SURE.
BUT THEY'VE BEEN MOVING QUICKLY AS WELL.
I DON'T THINK THAT HAVING ONE- ACRE PARCELS IS COMPLEMENTARY TO THE OTHER PARCELS ON PINE ISLAND ROAD. THEY'RE VERY SMALL LOTS IN COMPARISON TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER, ME.
AND IF YOU LOOK AT THE DRAWING THAT HE HAS PROPOSED,
[01:25:01]
HE'S PROPOSED A LANDSCAPE BUFFER ON THE EAST SIDE AND SOUTH SIDE OF HIS PARCEL WITH NO REGARD TO THE PROPERTY LINE BOUNDARY THAT I HAVE WITH MY PROPERTY. I'M NOT SURE WHY THAT WOULD BE OR IF IT WAS HIS -- I DON'T KNOW IF THE INTENT IS BECAUSE WE'VE LEFT OUR PROPERTY QUITE WILD, INTENTIONALLY TO KEEP THE CHARACTERISTIC AND THE FAUNA AND FLORA OF THAT VERY SPECIAL PLACE AT THAT END OF PINE ISLAND ROAD.I FEEL LIKE HAVING FOUR OR FIVE HOMES BE PERMITTED ON A 5.7- ACRE IS RECKLESS ON A DIRT ROAD WITH -- YOU KNOW, THAT WE'VE ALL BEEN ABLE TO REALLY ENJOY AS HAVING A LITTLE PART OF RURAL FLORIDA FOR AS LONG AS WE POSSIBLY CAN.
I THINK THAT MR. ELAM WAS AWARE THAT IT WAS ZONED THE WAY THAT IT IS WHEN HE PURCHASED IT RECENTLY AND THAT IF HIS INTENTIONS WERE TO BUILD A PROPERTY WITH A FAMILY COMPOUND ASPECT TO IT HE COULD HAVE FOUND ANOTHER PIECE OF PROPERTY SOMEWHERE ELSE. AND I LOVE MY FAMILY JUST AS MUCH AS ANYBODY. BUT THERE'S NO GUARANTEE THAT THESE PARCELS ARE GOING TO BE USED FOR HIS FAMILY. THIS COULD JUST VERY -- I DON'T KNOW MR. ELAM. HE COULD BE A DEVELOPER FOR ALL I KNOW, WANT TO BUILD, YOU KNOW, TRACT HOMES ON A SHARED DRIVEWAY WHICH LOOKS LIKE A CUL-DE- SAC TO ME. BUT MAYBE THEY COULD CLARIFY WHY THEY NEED TO HAVE IT SEPARATE INTO SUCH SMALL PARCELS AND WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS -- THAT'S ADDITIONAL QUALITY OF LIFE FOR THAT AREA AND WHAT IT ALL STANDS FOR FOR THE REST OF THE NEIGHBORS. THE OTHER NEIGHBORS I DID SPEAK TO, THEY ALL HAVE FULL-TIME JOBS AND WORKING OUT OF TOWN.
I KNOW THAT RECENTLY THE FAMILY ACROSS THE STREET THAT HAS THE SAME ZONING, OR THE ZONING THAT HE'S ASKING FOR TO BEBE TO, WAS HERE QUITE A BIT PURSUING THEIR LAND -- OR CUTTING UP THEIR PROPERTY INTO MULTIPLE LOTS.
BUT ALL THEIR LOTS ARE 1 1/2, 1. 8 ACRES.
AND THEY HAVE ACCESS STRICTLY OFF OF PINE ISLAND ROAD WITH OVER 100 FEET OF ROAD FRONTAGE PER LOT. AND SO IT STILL HAS THAT VERY RURAL FEEL TO THEIR PROPERTY. I JUST WAS REALLY TAKEN ABACK WHEN I SAW THE DRAWING WITH THE FOUR LITTLE LOTS AND THAT CUL-DE-SAC. SO MAYBE THEY COULD GIVE US SOME CLARITY. BUT I CERTAINLY -- ALTOGETHER WE HAVE ABOUT 19 ACRES ON PINE ISLAND ROAD, JUST ONE FAMILY. AND WE ARE A LITTLE NERVOUS ABOUT HAVING THIS SUBDIVISION PUT IN OUR BACK YARD WITHOUT ANY CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.
>> THANK YOU. IS THERE ANYONE ELSE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEM NUMBER 7? GO AHEAD.
YOU GUYS CAN COME UP AND RESPOND.
>> HOW ARE WE DOING? CARY ELAM, OWNER OF THE PINE ISLAND PARCEL. THE ONLY THING I CAN SPEAK DEFINITIVELY ABOUT IS WHY THERE WASN'T A BUFFER BETWEEN THE WEST SIDE, WHICH SHE ALLUDES TO, IS BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS OWNER CLEAR- CUT THAT TO THE PROPERTY LINE. THE OTHER AREAS TO THE EAST, BUFFER WAS LEFT.
TO THE WEST OR TO THE SOUTH, I'M SORRY, IS PALENCIA.
AND THAT BUFFER WAS LEFT, WHICH WE HAVEN'T TOUCHED.
OUR HOUSE SITS IN THERE. I DON'T KNOW HOW I EXPLAIN TO WHERE ELAM FAMILY LEGACY THAT I'M BUILDING A SUBDIVISION. BUT I PLAN ON GOING OUT FEET FIRST ON THIS ONE. AND SO THIS IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN LOOKING FOR FOR YEARS, A PARCEL IN ST. JOHNS COUNTY.
I FOUND IT DIFFICULT TO FIND A PARCEL LARGE ENOUGH THAT WE COULD BUILD OUR FAMILY ON AND HAVE MY CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN EACH GIFT THEM A PARCEL FOR THEIR HOMES TO HELP THEM AND KEEP IT AS A LEGACY HOME. SO BEYOND THAT, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH. MOVING QUICKLY, THIS HAS BEEN OVER A EAR FOR US TRYING TO GET THROUGH ALL OF OUR COMMISSIONER HEARINGS AND TRYING TO RIGHT THE WRONGS THAT WERE DONE ON THE PROPERTY BEFOREHAND WITH THE PREVIOUS OWNER, WHICH WE'VE DONE EVERYTHING IN OUR POWER TO DO THE CORRECT THING TO GET TO THIS POINT. SO BEYOND THAT, IT IS FOR FAMILY USE. AND YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW BEYOND THAT WHAT I CAN SAY. BUT MY HOUSE IS SOLD.
I MOVED INTO MY RENTAL TWO DAYS AGO.
AND I'M AND GET STARTED. AND, YOU KNOW, BECOME A NEIGHBOR OF PINE ISLAND. SO ANY
[01:30:01]
YOU.>> SURE. >> IT SOUNDS TO ME COMMUNICATIO IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE NOT TRYING TO BE A BAD NEIGHBOR.
SOUNDS LIKE YOU'RE NOT TRYING TO MESS WITH SOMEONE'S WAY OF LIFE.
>> WE'VE HAD COMMUNICATION WITH ANYBODY WHO DROPS BY BECAUSE WE'RE DOING AS MUCH WORK OURSELVES OUT THERE AS WE POSSIBLY CAN.
I'VE BECOME FRIENDS WITH THE ARNOLDS.
MY NEIGHBOR TO THE EAST IS A VERY FRIENDLY
FELLOW. >> YOU JUST COMMUNICATE.
IT'S GOOD. THAT'S A GOOD THING.
I THINK IT'S GOOD TO BRING IT OUT AND MAYBE SHE CAN FEEL MORE AT EASE ABOUT IT THAN HAVE IT BE AN ADVERSARIAL THING TO YOUR LAND.
>> I WOULD HAVE LOVE TO HAVE DONE THAT, THAT'S WHAT WE HAPPEN LOOKING FOR A COMPOUND WHERE ALL OUR FAMILY CAN --
ACHIEVE. >> YOU'VE BEEN THROUGH A LOT.
YOU HAVE BEEN THROUGH A LOT, INDEED.
I THANK YOU AND I APPLAUD WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO.
>> HOW MUCH DO YOU HAVE ON PINE ISLAND RIGHT AWAY,
SIR? >> IT DOESN'T SHOW UP, BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE FOR LOT 1 AND LOT 2, SO I WOULD ASSUME IT'D BE CLOSE TO 300 FEET.
>> AND JUST THAT BACK STORY, THE ELAM FAMILY DID GO THROUGH THE WHOLE PROCESS, HAD TO WORK THROUGH THE COLD VIOLATION THAT THEY BROUGHT TO LIGHT TO THE COUNTY.
WENT THROUGH THAT ENTIRE PROCESS, WORKED OUT AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY AND GOT IT APPROVED BY THE COMMISSIONER. BEFORE WE COULD EVEN START THIS PROCESS, THEY HAD TO CLEAR THAT HURDLE BEFOREHAND.
SO THIS HAS BEEN A LONG PROCESS.
>> JUST A QUICK QUESTION. WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO PUT IN A VEGETATIVE BUFFER IN THERE ON THE WEST SIDE?
>> WHAT WE PLAN TO DO, AND I'M NOT GOING TO SIT HERE AND MAKE PROMISES TO DO WHATEVER, BUT PLAN TO -- I'M GOING TO BE LIVING THERE PERSONALLY, AND NIGH FAMILY IS GOING TO BE LIVING THERE PERSONALLY. SO OUR PLAN IS OBVIOUSLY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL WE HAVE TO LANDSCAPE IT EXTENSIVELY BASED ON THE TREES THAT WE'VE AGREED TO REPLACE GOING THROUGH OUR ENVIRONMENTAL HURDLES, WHICH WE CAME TO AN AMICABLE DECISION ON THAT. SO TO GIVE YOU A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A BUFFER BETWEEN THE TWO, YEAH, I WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A BUFFER BETWEEN THAT PROPERTY ALSO, BUT I DON'T HAVE A DESIGN DRAWN UP, BUT THERE'S NOT A BUFFER THERE NOW BECAUSE THE RECKLESSNESS OF THE PREVIOUS OWNER JUST HAPPENED TO ON THE WEST SIDE DECIDED TO MAKE THAT A CLEAN CUT RIGHT TO THE PROPERTY LINE.
OKAY. >> AND THERE IS -- THERE IS AN APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN, EFFECTIVELY, TO MAKE UP FOR CREDITS THAT WERE TAKEN OUT. AND THERE IS INCREASED PLANNING ALONG THAT WESTERN BOUNDARY LINE, BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE MOST OF THE TREES WILL BE TAKEN UP.
>> THE REASON I ASK THAT QUESTION IS UNDER OR LAND USE I BELIEVE YOU HAVE TO HAVE 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE, AND I'M NOT SURE THAT THIS PRIVATE DRIVE OR WHATEVER THIS IS WILL QUALIFY.
SO I'M PERHAPS ASKING STAFF ARE THEY GOING TO HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A VARIANCE BECAUSE THEY HAVE LESS THAN 100 FEET OF FRONTAGE TO GET THESE FOUR LOTS, OR IS THIS ZONING EFFECTIVELY OVERRIDING THAT REQUIREMENT?
>> YES, SIR. TO MR. MATOVINA'S QUESTION, SO THE APPLICANT ACTUALLY HAS A COMPANION ITEM THAT'S GOING ALONG WITH THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, BUT THEY'RE ALL SPECIFICALLY NON- ZONING VARIANCES.
THOSE ARE NOT ITEMS THAT COME BEFORE THIS AGENCY.
THEY ARE DESCRIBED IN THE STAFF REPORT, BUT THEY ARE RELATED TO ACCESS AND THE DRIVE AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
>> OKAY, SO THEY'RE ASKING FOR A VARIANCE BUT IT'S A STAFF ISSUE?
>> NOT A STAFF ISSUE. IT'S -- IT'S A TECHNICAL -- IT'S ALL RELATED ACCESS, PLATTING, AND SO FORTH. BUT IT IS BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER DECISION AND THAT APPLICATION DOES NOT COME THROUGH THIS AGENCY.
>> OKAY, SO THERE IS ANOTHER HEARING.
IT'S JUST WE DON'T SEE IT HERE.
>> WHEN THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT -- WHEN THIS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT REQUEST GOES BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THEY WILL CONCURRENTLY HEAR IT AND THE NON- ZONING VARIANCE RELIEF
SO THE REALITY IS THE APPLICANT WITH THIS LAND USE CHANGE WITHOUT THAT DRIVER ROAD PRESUMABLY COULD PUT THREE LOTS AND NOT HAVE TO HAVE THE ROAD, I
[01:35:07]
>> ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, WE'RE BACK INTO THE AGENCY FOR A MOTION. MR. GREEN?
>> YES. I MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF CPASS 20-06 ELAM FAMILY LEGACY BASED ON FINDINGS OF FACT.
>> OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION FOR APPROVAL. A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.
SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER THE VOTE. ALL RIGHT, THAT MOTION PASSES
[Items 8 & 9]
7-0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT, ONTO ITEM NUMBER 8.>> I DID A SITE VISIT AND I HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROS AND CONS OF THE APPLICATION.
>> YES, I DID HAVE A PHONE CALL FROM MR. BURNETT, AND I DID A SITE VISIT AND BRIEF E- MAIL EXCHANGE FROM NICOLE CROSBY.
>> AND I HAD A CONVERSATION YESTERDAY WITH MR. BURNETT TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY AND REALLY WHERE THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS HEADED.
>> I HAD -- I DID A SITE VISIT, AND I GUESS MR. BURNETT WAS ON THE PHONE A LOT YESTERDAY BECAUSE I ALSO GOT A CALL FROM HIM AND HAD A
HILSENBACK. >> I'VE DRIVEN BY THE SITE PROBABLY 62 TIMES. THAT'S AN ESTIMATE.
I ALSO HAD A CONVERSATION YESTERDAY ON THE PHONE WITH DOUG BURNETT, AND IT WAS VERY INFORMATIVE AND PLEASANT SO --
>> AND I ALSO HAD A CONVERSATION WITH MR. BURNETT YESTERDAY ABOUT THIS APPLICATION.
FLOOR IS YOURS. ARE YOU DOING BOTH ITEMS SEPARATELY, OR ARE YOU GOING TO DO
THEM TOGETHER? >> I'M GOING TO DO THEM TOGETHER, IF THAT PLEASES THE
YEAH. >> I THINK IT MAKES SENSE CONSIDERING THE HISTORY OF THE APPLICATION.
FOR THE RECORD, DOUG BURNETT, ST. JOHNS LAW GROUP, 104 SEAGROVE MAIN STREET, AND IT IS NICE TO WALK UP THIS TIME RATHER THAN EARLIER.
WITH ME TODAY IS QUINTAN PERRY AND ALSO KRISTEN JOHNSON ON BEHALF OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE PROPERTY. QUINTAN AND I HAVE WORK ONNED THIS FROM DAY ONE THE HYDE PARK PRD AND PUD. I'VE GOT A PRESENTATION THAT COMBINES THEM BECAUSE IT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE. THEY'RE SO CLOSE, AND IT'LL ALSO PAINT A PICTURE AS TO HOW WE GOT TO HERE. AND GET RID OF THE GREEN DRAWING. I KNOW Y'ALL KNOW THE AREA BUT IT'S U.S. 1 SOUTH, AS FAR SOUTH AS YOU CAN GET FROM THE COUNTY BASICALLY BASICALLY AT I-95. THE GREEN REPRESENTS THE MIXED USE AND THE BLUE REPRESENTS THE PRD OR WHAT IS RS ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.
AND THAT IS PRECISELY WHY WE WOUND UP WITH TWO PROJECTS, A PUD AND A PRD, ALTHOUGH IT'S ONE OWNERSHIP AND HAS BEEN ONE OWNERSHIP FOR 25 YEARS AT THIS STAGE.
HERE'S A FUTURE LAND USE MAP. YOU CAN SEE THE MIXED USE AND THE RS. AGAIN, ANOTHER LOOK AT THAT DRAWING WHERE YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THE PUD PARCEL AND THEN THE PRD.
AND THEN HERE'S THE ZONING MAP. I THINK AN AERIAL OVERLAY ON THAT TO WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE PUD AND PRD FROM A ZONING STANDPOINT WITH AN AERIAL IN THE BACKGROUND.
LET'S TALK ABOUT THE HISTORY OF IT.
ORIGINALLY 2009 WAS THE APPROVAL.
THESE ARE THE TWO ORDINANCES. SIMILAR TO TODAY, THEY WENT SIDE BY SIDE AND THEY WENT BACK THROUGH A MAJOR MODIFICATION. THESE ARE ACTUALLY THE ORDINANCES FROM THE MAJOR MOD IN 2012. I'LL SHOW YOU LOOSELY WHAT THAT DID AND ACCOMPLISHED IN 2012. BUT THESE ARE THE TWO ORDINANCES. THIS IS WHAT'S APPROVED CURRENTLY.
THIS IS WHAT IT'S ENTITLED TO. YOU CAN SEE THE 350 SQUARE FOOT SPACE OF RETAIL SPACE, 50,000 PROFESSIONAL AND OFFICE SPACE, 175 ROOMS OF HOTEL, AND
[01:40:02]
275,000 SQUARE FEET OF INDUSTRIAL SPACE AND FINALLY 20 RESIDENTIAL UNITS ON APPROXIMATELY 90 ACRES OF LAND. ON THE PRD, AGAIN, BACK TO THE 2012 TIME PERIOD, THERE'S 37 UNITS.AND THOSE 37 UNITS ARE ON 178 ACRES.
SO IF I PUT THAT TOGETHER AND NOW YOU LOOK AT AN EMBELLISHED SITE PLAN, THIS IS BEFORE THE MODIFICATION WAS DONE. AND IF YOU LOOK IN THIS NORTH, SOUTH CENTER PRETTY EASILY IDENTIFIABLE WETLAND AREA GOING NORTH AND SOUTH, THIS LOOP ROAD THAT'S IN THIS LOCATION WHERE MY POINTER IS, THAT LOOP ROAD ACTUALLY WENT THROUGH A WETLAND, WHEN WE WENT TO PERMIT IT.
AND SO IN '12 THAT WAS MODIFIED.
BUT I WANTED TODAY SHARE WITH YOU THE COLORS SO YOU COULD GET AN IDEA OF THE OVERALL FLAVOR OF THE PROJECT. I'LL SHOW YOU IF YOU LOOK AT THE PUD, THIS IS THE PUD COLOR EMBELLISHED.
AND IF WE FLIPPED TO THE NEXT PAGE, YOU CAN SEE NOW -- AND IF I FLIP BACK AND FLIP FORWARD, YOU'LL SEE VERY CLEARLY.
YOU CAN SEE THIS LOOP ROAD COMING INTO THIS SECTION HERE, AND WHEN WE GET TO 2012 WE AVOID THAT WETLAND. SO THAT WAS THE BIG MODIFICATION THAT OCCURRED. AN INTERESTING GOOD FACT FOR THIS PUD BECAUSE SO OFTENTIMES IN EVERY PUD THAT COMES BEFORE YOU, THE NORM IS WE'VE GOT TO HAVE WETLAND IMPACTS TO DEVELOP THE PROJECT.
THIS PUD DOES NOT HAVE WETLAND IMPACTS. AND MORE AMAZINGLY THAN THAT, THE STORM WATER PONDS, WHICH I'LL SHOW YOU AN ARROW OF IN A MOMENT, THE STORM WATER PONDS WERE PERMITTED AND CONSTRUCTED BACK IN TO 2013 TIME PERIOD, FULLY PERMITTED AS BUILT DRAWINGS TO THE COUNTY. THAT PORTION WAS COMPLETED, AND ONLY THE PRD HAS WETLAND IMPACTS, AND THAT IS UNDER 0.2 OF AN ACRE. I THINK IT'S -- HERE'S THE DOCUMENT ON THE PRD.
MDP MAP ON THE PRD, AND I THINK I'VE GOT A BLOW UP HERE FOR YOU TO ALSO SEE TIME FRAME OF WHEN THIS WAS APPROVED. AND THEN FINALLY IF I PUT THIS TOGETHER, I WANT TO TELL YOU THERE'S NO PART OF THE APPLICATION BEFORE YOU THAT SEEKS TO CHANGE THE MAPS. THERE'S ZERO CHANGE TO THE MDP MAP FOR THE PUD OR THE PRD. SO I'M SHOWING YOU THIS FOR CONTEXT OF THE HISTORY BUT ALSO THAT YOU KNOW THERE'S NO CHANGES. FINALLY, RELATED TO THE HISTORY OF THE PROJECT, THIS IS A CLEARANCE LETTER FROM THIS YEAR. THIS IS 2025, AS YOU CAN SEE AT THE TOP. IT'S A CONFIRMATION LETTER OF THE ZONING. IT'S FOR FIRST FIRST COAST VENTURES, WHICH HAS OWNED THE LAND FOR 25 YEARS, AND IT'S REGARDING THE PUD AND THE PRD AND THE RELATED APPROVALS FOR THE CONCURRENCY AND SCHOOL CONCURRENCY. OBVIOUSLY THERE'S ONLY 57 HOMES TOTAL BETWEEN THE PUD AND THE PRD.
IT'S ONLY 57, BUT IT DOES HAVE CONCURRENCY IN PLACE. ONE THING TO NOTE HERE ON THE PUD, IT DOESN'T EXPIRE UNTIL 2032.
AND THE PRD DOES NOT EXPIRE UNTIL 2032.
AND THEN OBVIOUSLY THERE'S SOME APPROVALS IN HERE WHERE THEY RUN OUT INTO THE 2034- TYPE TIME PERIOD, AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE BOTTOM OF THE CHART RIGHT ABOVE THE BOTTOM ARROW RELATED TO CONCURRENCY. 2025, I WANT TO HIGHLIGHT SOME THINGS. IF WE LOOK AT THE 2009 AND 2012 APPROVALS, AS I OUTLINED EARLIER IN THOSE PUD ORDINANCES, THIS IS WHAT'S ENTITLED IN THE PROJECT. AND NONE OF THOSE ARE BEING CHANGED. THERE'S NO PART OF THIS MAJOR NOTIFICATION THAT SEEKS TO CHANGE THE MAP.
AND THERE'S NO PART OF THIS MAJOR MODIFICATION THAT SEEKS TO CHANGE ANY OF THESE SQUARE FOOTAGES OR OTHER ENTITLEMENTS LISTED HERE. AGAIN, MAP'S THE SAME.
THIS IS NO CHANGE TO THE PUD MAP AND NO CHANGE TO THE MDP MAP FOR THE PRD. YOUR STAFF DID A GOOD JOB OF OUTLINING SOME OF THE LISTED CHANGES AND SUMMARIZING THEM. IF WE GO BACK IN TIME TO THE 2000 TIME PERIOD, ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IN THE STAFF'S REPORT IS THAT WE'RE CORRECTING SOME CLERICAL ERRORS, AS SOME OF YOU MAY APPRECIATE IF YOU WENT BACK 16 YEARS AGO IN MY CAREER, PROBABLY NOT AS EXPERIENCED AS I AM, PROBABLY NOT AS -- HOPEFULLY I PAY MORE ATTENTION NOW AND TRY AND MAKE SURE I DON'T HAVE AS MANY CLERICAL ERRORS TODAY THAT MAYBE THAT OCCURRED THEN.
BUT CLEARLY WE NEEDED TO CLEAN SOME THINGS UP.
[01:45:01]
OVERALL YOU ALSO HAVE JUST A DYNAMIC OF WHAT HAS GONE ON IN THE COUNTY. WE DIDN'T REVISIT THE TEXT IN 2012. THERE'S A 2020 -- A 2009 TEXT, SO ALL OF THE THINGS THAT HAVE GONE ON IN PUDS AND IN PRDS SINCE HAVE NEEDED TO BE UPDATED IN THE TEXT HERE.FOR EXAMPLE, INTERNALLY OUR ROADS ARE PRIVATE ROADS.
THEY COULD BE ACCEPTED BY THE COUNTY, OBVIOUSLY, BUT THEY'RE PRIVATE ROADS. WELL, ONE THING NOBODY WAS THINKING ABOUT IN '09 YOU WOULD PUT IN YOUR TEXT YOU COULD HAVE A ROUNDABOUT, SOMETHING I DON'T THINK MANY PEOPLE WERE THINKING ABOUT IN '09 IS THAT YOU WOULD HAVE PAVERS IN YOUR TOWN CENTERS OR IN THE AREA OF YOUR STOREFRONT, YOUR COMMERCIAL RETAIL YOU COULD HAVE PAVERS OR YOUR OFFICE COMPLEX. SO WE'VE ADDED SOME OF THAT TYPE OF LANGUAGE IN THERE TO ALLOW FOR THOSE THINGS, EVEN ALLEYWAYS. ALSO WE NEEDED TO CLARIFY SIGNAGE.
A NUMBER OF COMMENTS WE GOT RELATED TO THE PUD AND THE PRD WAS THIS OR THAT NEEDED TO BE UPDATED TO REFLECT THE CODE.
THE LIGHTING REFERENCE TO PARKING LIGHTS NEEDED TO REFERENCE THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN THE PROVISION, IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH WAS MISSING FROM OUR PUD. SO A LOT OF THAT KIND OF THING.
AND THEN TWO ITEMS TO POINT OUT. ONE, ON THE PUD, IT DID NOT PROHIBIT ADULT USES. MY CLIENT HAS ZERO INTEREST OF HAVING ADULT USES APPROVED UNDER THEIR PUD.
AND THEY DON'T HAVE AN INTEREST IN SELLING ANY PORTION OR OUT PARCEL FOR THAT KIND OF USE, SO LET'S PUT IT IN THE PUD.
IT'S NOT IN THERE. WE'RE PUTTING IT IN THERE TO PROHIBIT THAT USE. AND THEN, GIVE ME ONE SECOND. OH, ON THE ISSUE OF HEIGHT, I SAW THIS IN THE STAFF REPORT. OUR HOTEL FOR 175 ROOMS, THE HOTELS WHETHER IT'S ONE OR TWO WOULD BE ALLOWED TO GO UP TO 55 FEET. THAT'S ALREADY IN THE PUD.
WHAT WASN'T IN THE PUD IF YOU GO UP ABOVE 35 FEET, YOU HAVE ADDITIONAL FEET OF SETBACK WHICH IS NORMAL LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE LANGUAGE. YOU EXCEED 35 FEET, YOU SETBACK 5 FEET FOR EVERY 5 FEET YOU GO UP.
AND SO WE PUT THAT LANGUAGE IN THERE, AND THEN WE DID INCREASE THE COMMERCIAL TO ALLOW IT TO GO TO 45, BUT WITH THAT ADDED SETBACK, WHICH IS PRETTY ROUTINE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE LANGUAGE ON PROJECTS. PRD, ONE THING I WILL POINT OUT THAT'S INTERESTING ABOUT THE PRD, NOT ONLY DID WE UPDATE IT FOR WHAT A MODERN PRD WOULD LOOK LIKE IN THAT LANGUAGE TO BRING IN SOME THOSE ISSUES, BUT OUR PRD EVEN THOUGH IT'S CLEARLY INTERCONNECTIVITY IN OUR MDP MAPS AND CHEERILY THE ROAD GOES AND CONNECTS THE TWO PROJECTS, IT WASN'T SPELLED OUT IN OUR TEXT, AND SO WE'VE GOT THAT LANGUAGE INSERTED IN OUR PRD TEXT, WHICH WOULD BE THE NORMAL WAY YOU WOULD DO IT IN TODAY'S MODERN WORLD. AND THEN WITH THAT, I'VE GOT ONE FINAL DRAWING.
THIS IS AN AERIAL, THE MOST CURRENT ONE I COULD FIND ONLINE, AND YOU CAN SEE THE TWO GREENISH SORT OF COLORED PONDS ON THE LEFT OF THE PROJECT. THOSE WERE THE PONDS BUILT IN CONNECTION WITH THE STORM WATER PERMITTING THAT WENT ON BACK IN 2013. AND IF I OVERLAY THE PUD DRAWING FOR THAT PORTION, YOU CAN SEE THERE'S REALLY GOOD ALIGNMENT BETWEEN THE TWO BECAUSE THAT'S, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S APPROVED AND WHAT'S CONTEMPLATED FOR THE PROJECT.
AND THEN THE REST OF THE PUD IS IN THIS AREA.
AND THEN THE PRD. AND I'M SORRY IT SEEMS LIKE THE PRD WHEN I DID THIS OVERLAY MAYBE JOGGED JUST A LITTLE BIT TO THE LEFT FROM WHERE IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE.
BUT OVERALL IT GIVES YOU A REALLY GOOD FEEL.
LOOKS LIKE IT ALIGNS WITH THE POND REALLY WELL ON THE BOTTOM, BUT IT MAY BE OFF SLIGHTLY.
ANYWAYS, THAT GIVESIA A FEEL OF WHAT THE PROJECT IS, WHAT'S GOING ON. AND, YES, ARE WE ASKING FOR LONGER TIME IN THE PHASING? YES. RIGHT NOW YOU GET A 2032, 2034-TYPE FRAME, AND WE'RE ASKING TO GO TO 2040 WITH OUR TIME FRAME. WHICH A 15- YEAR PHASING SCHEDULE IS KIND OF NORMAL FOR A PROJECT OF THIS NATURE. SO WITH THAT I'LL BE -- I'LL BE QUIET AND HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY
QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS? DR. HILSENBACK.
>> DOUG, I THINK YOU DID A GREAT JOB UPDATING THE TEXT, SO THE BLUE LINE WAS HELPFUL AND WARRANTED AND NEEDED, BUT I'M REALLY CONCERNED AFTER YOU ENDED ON IT THE EXTENSION OF YOUR DEVELOPMENT DEADLINE.
THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE 2009, UPDATED IN 2012.
YOU HAD SEVERAL DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXTENSIONS DUE
[01:50:01]
TO HURRICANES AND SO FORTH. I MEAN, THIS HAS BEEN GOING ON FOR 16 YEARS ALREADY.AND IF WE APPROVE THIS AS IT STATES, THE NEW TEXT STATES VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION OF EACH PROPOSED COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING AND RELATED CIVIL SITE CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING TIME LIMIT OF 15 YEARS FOR COMMENCEMENT WITH COMPLETION FIVE YEARS THEREAFTER. IF WE APPROVE THIS, THIS EXTENDS IT OUT TO 2045 BASICALLY WHERE YOU COMPLETE THIS.
SO I -- THAT TO ME IS A MAJOR ISSUE IN YOUR MODIFICATION PROPOSAL THAT I PERSONALLY CAN'T SUPPORT SOME OTHER THINGS.
YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE SAID THIS IS REALLY TO ME ON THE PHONE YESTERDAY.
I DON'T BELIEVE YOU SAID IT TODAY NECESSARILY, THAT THIS IS REALLY AN IMPORTANT AREA FOR THE COUNTY.
IT'S A MAJOR INTERSECTION US1, I-95.
IF IT'S SUCH AN IMPORTANT AREA OF THE COUNTY AND DEVELOPMENT IS RIPE THERE, WHY HASN'T THE COUNTY EXTENDED A WATER MAIN AND FORCE MAIN SEWER ALL THE BAY DOWN THERE? AS WE DISCUSSED ON THE PHONE YESTERDAY IT'S ABOUT 6. 27 MILE FROM SANDSTONE COURT AND US1 TO GET WATER AND SEWER DOWN THERE. BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT PROPOSING ALL THIS TO BE ON SEPTIC TANK AND WELL, I ASSUME. SO IN ORDER -- THE COUNTY'S UTILITY LETTER STATED YOU NEEDED TO EXTEND THE FOREST MAIN AND THE WATER MAIN LINE DOWN THERE, SO THAT'S A MAJOR CONCERN. IF THIS IS SUCH A GREAT DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND AS THE PERSON WHO SPOKE -- COURTNEY SPOKE EARLIER WHEN SHE WAS DESCRIBING THE SITE WITH THE RACETRACK GAS STATION, SHE SAID HONESTLY IT'S PAY PAST -- THAT DESCRIBES IT PRETTY WELL. THIS IS FAR- FLUNG AREA OF THE COUNTY. IT'S WAY DOWN THERE. IT'S THE END OF THE COUNTY, AS YOU JUST POINTED OUT YOURSELF, SO I'M HAVING SOME TROUBLE OVER THAT.
THAT IT'S SO FAR- OUT AWAY FROM ANY CURRENT SERVICES THAT ARE PROVIDED. YOU SAY DEVELOPMENT AND THIS IS IN YOUR PROPOSAL, QUOTE, IS CONSISTENT WITH THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TREND FOR THE AREA. WHAT IS THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TREND FOR THE AREA? THERE HADN'T BEEN MUCH AT ALL.
NOW WE HAVE THE RACETRACK AT 204 AND US1, WHICH I THOUGHT WAS A SUITABLE SCOPE AND SCALE. THIS SEEMS WAY, WAY ABOVE SUITABLE SCOPE AND SCALE.
>> YEAH, I GUESS TO TAKE A FEW OF THOSE THAT WOULD BE HELPFUL. AND I THINK PART OF THIS MAY BOW A PARADIGM SHIFT BECAUSE A LOT OF THE TIMES I WOULD TELL YOU THAT THE WAY I WOULD SUGGEST EVALUATING OR HOPE YOU WOULD EVALUATE THINGS IS WHAT'S THE REAL PRACTICAL IMPACT? AND I THINK IF WE LOOK AT RIGHT NOW THESE PROJECTS CLEARLY HAVE VESTED RIGHTS TO GO FORWARD AT LEAST UNTIL
>> WELL, IF WE SAY THAT IN THE NEXT SEVEN YEARS THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE A DEVELOPMENTAL ORDER EXTENSION, THAT WOULDN'T BE THE REALITY. THE REALITY IS WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A HURRICANE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ZIKA, GOD BLESS LET'S NOT HOPE WE HAVE COVID, BUT ALL THOSE THINGS LEAD TO WILDFIRES, THOSE THINGS EVEN OPIOID ADDICTION CAUSED DEVELOPMENT EXTENSIONS.
OVER THE NEXT SEVEN YEARS, NINE YEARS, WE'RE GOING TO GET FURTHER EXTENSIONS. AND THEN THE OTHER THING I WOULD TELL YOU RELATED TO THAT IS, OKAY, IF WE SAY, OKAY, THIS PROJECT WE NEED TO FORCE IT TO GO FORWARD UNDER ITS CURRENT TIMEFRAME, THEN WHAT I THINK THE CHALLENGE IS THE PERMIT GETS PULLED, AND YOU'VE GOT FIVEFIVE AT LEAST THAT THE PERMIT CAN STAY ACTIVE, THE CONSTRUCTION PERMIT.
AND THAT'S IF THERE'S NO DEVELOPMENT ORDER EXTENSION, AGAIN, EXTENDING THAT AS WELL.
SO YOU'VE GOT FIVE YEARS. THE DEVELOPER COULD HIT A WALL WHERE WHAT THEY NEED TO DO IS GO IN AND PUT IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE AND CREATE ALL THE OUT-PARCELS. AND THERE'S SOME CODE CHANGES THAT HAVE TAKEN PLACE. BUT OVERALL AS WE'VE ALL SEEN AROUND OUR COUNTY, THERE'S A LOT OF OPPORTUNITY TO GO AHEAD AND DO THE INFRASTRUCTURE, VEST ALL OF THE LOTS IN OUT- PARCELS AND LET IT SIT INDEFINITELY IN PERPETUITY, WHICH IS WHAT YOU CAN DO. IF WE LOOK AT EPIC THEATERS
[01:55:01]
IN OUTPARCELS IN FRONT OF THE THEATER, WE'VE ALL BEEN LOOKING AT THOSE SINCE I THINK THE '08 TIME PERIOD WITH NOTHING ON THEM. ONLY RECENTLY HAVE WE SEEN THINGS LIKE PLANET FITNESS AND OTHER USES COME ALONG AND THE LIKE.OTHERWISE THEY WERE SITTING AS DIRT LOTS.
I THINK THAT ENCOURAGES THE POTENTIAL FOR THAT TO HAPPEN, TO PROTECT THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. AND I THINK ACTUALLY IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT IT FROM A RESIDENT OR MAYBE EVEN FOLKS THAT -- I DON'T KNOW -- COULD BE OPPOSED TO IT, THE LONGER IT STAYS THE WAY IT IS THE BETTER FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE.
AND SO I'D OFFER THAT TO YOU AS AN EXCUSE OF WHY FROM A STANDPOINT OF OUR PHASING GOING TO 2040 INSTEAD OF GOING BACK TO COUNTY STAFF HAVE WRITTEN SAYING IT'S VESTED THROUGH 2032 AND 2034 KNOWING WE'RE GOING TO GET TO THAT DATE ANYWAYS FOR EXECUTIVE ORDER, I WOULD TELL YOU THAT'S A REALLY GOOD REASON IN MY HUMBLE OPINION AS TO WHY THIS DEADLINE OF GOING TO 2040 JUST DOESN'T REALLY MATTER IN THE OVERALL SCHEME.
AND AS FAR AS OUR CONVERSATION ON THE INTERCHANGE, I WAS JUST POINTING OUT I- 95 INTERCHANGE IN GENERAL STATEWIDE BECAUSE I-95 IS OBVIOUSLY THE ASSIST FOR THE STATE, THE STRATEGIC INTERMODAL SYSTEM. THOSE INTERCHANGES ARE ALWAYS IMPORTANT AND WHERE YOU WOULD HAVE DEVELOPMENT. CLEARLY WITHOUT QUESTION THE COUNTY HAS FAR MORE PRIORITIES THAN DRAGGING WATER AND SEWER TO THIS INTERCHANGE, SO I DON'T THINK ANYONE WOULD EXPECT THAT TO HAPPEN ANY TIME SOON IN THE FUTURE BECAUSE THE COUNTY HAS SO MANY OTHER PRIORITIES AND DEMANDS ON SERVICES.
>> THOSE ARE GOOD ANSWERS. I MEAN, YOU ALWAYS THINK WELL ON YOUR FEET, HAVE GOOD ANSWERS. BUT BY THE SAME TOKEN OF YOU ARGUING THESE ARE -- THEY'RE GOING TO BE LIKELY BECAUSE GOING TO HAVE ANOTHER HURRICANE AT SOME POINT.
THERE'S GOING TO BE EXTENSIONS OF DEVELOPMENT ORDERS. WE'D BE GRANTING YOU 15 YEARS PLUS 5. AND THEN IF WE HAVE SUCH CATASTROPHIC OCCURRENCES, AS YOU SAID WILDFIRES AND OTHER COVID OR SOMETHING ELSE OR HURRICANES, THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU'D GET FURTHER EXTENSIONS. SO THIS MIGHT GO TO 2060 OR 2070. WE DON'T KNOW.
AND IT'S THE STATE THAT'S GRANTING THOSE EMERGENCY DEVELOPMENT ORDERS NOT THE PZA OR THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, AS I UNDERSTAND IT. SO THAT'S A DIFFERENCE IN MY MIND. SO WHAT IS THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TREND FOR THE AREA DOWN THERE? I MEAN, I'VE BEEN DRIVING BY IT FOR YEARS.
>> I'M NOT SURE WHERE THAT LANGUAGE IS COMING FROM.
>> IT'S IN YOUR APPLICATION. ONE OF YOUR ANSWERS, I DON'T REMEMBER THE PAGE BUT --
>> I'M ASSUMING THAT MAY BE A CARRY OVER FROM EVEN '09 AND '12 PERIOD.
>> YEAH, AND WE HAD AN EXPERT LAND PLANNER AT THOSE HEARINGS. NOW HE'S GOT HIS OWN COMPANY, BUT THAT'S WHO OUR EXPERT CONSULTANT WAS AT THAT TIME PERIOD. AND HE HAD A LOT OF -- HE HAD A VERY ELABORATE PRESENTATION, I CAN TELL YOU, RELATED TO WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THE COUNTY AT THE TIME.
SO THE PLAN IS FOR Y'ALL TO EXTEND THE SEWER AND WATER DOWN THERE, THAT 6. 27 MILES. AND I MEASURED IT ON GOOGLE EARTH AS WELL, LIKE YOU DID, AND IT'S ABOUT WHAT I COME UP WITH. SO THE PLAN IS TO EXTEND THOSE, THE WATER MAIN AND THE FOREST MAIN SEWER DOWN THERE?
>> THAT'S BEEN AN ORIGINAL PART OF THE PROJECT.
IN FACT, WE HAVE OVER THE YEARS HAD NUMEROUS, NUMEROUS MEETINGS WITH THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT, UTILITY AGREEMENT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT WOULD TAKE AND DISCUSS THINGS.
AND IN FACT, WE'VE GOT A -- I THINK WE HAVE A CURRENT WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY.
>> RIGHT, THROUGH NOVEMBER. THAT LETTER IS GOOD THROUGH NOVEMBER.
>> SO THE PLAN IS TO GO AHEAD AND DO THAT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ONCE YOU GET APPROVAL THIS TIME AFTER THE 16- YEAR WAIT. AND I KNOW WE HAD A DOWNTURN IN 2008, '9 AND SO FORTH AND I UNDERSTAND WHAT COULD HAVE HELD THIS UP INITIALLY.
BUT 16 YEARS OF WAITING FOR THIS AND THERE'S BEEN NO MOVE TO EXTEND WATER AND SEWER DOWN THERE SO -- BUT YOUR PLAN IS TO DO THAT.
>> THAT IS A COMMITMENT THAT'S REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT TO BE
CONCERNING THE 218 GOPHER TORTOISE BURROWS OUT THERE, THAT'S A LOT OF BURROWS ON THAT PROPERTY. THAT'S A REAL HIGH DENSITY OF BURROWS. OF COURSE THEY CAN BE
[02:00:02]
RELOCATED OVER GOPHER TORTOISE RULES UNDER FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION.BUT ARE THERE SUFFICIENT RECIPIENT SITES THAT HAVE ENOUGH SPACE TO ACCEPT ALL THOSE GOPHER TORTOISES? I DON'T THINK THERE ARE 218 GOFER TORTS OUT THERE BUT THERE ARE 218 BURROWS. AND A LOT OF GOPHERS USE MORE THAN ONE ENTRANCE OR EXIT. SO THERE MIGHT BE A HUNDRED GOPHERS OUT THERE, WHICH WOULD TAKE ANYWHERE FROM 50 TO AT LEAST 25 ACRES OF MITIGATION AND ON A RECIPIENT SITE. IT'S TYPICAL TWO GOPHERS PER ACRE ON A MITIGATION SITE. UNDER SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES REALLY ATTACK QUALITY AND EXPERIMENTAL ASPECTS AND SO FORTH YOU COULD GET FOUR.
SO YOU'RE LOOKING AT 50 TO 25 ACRES OF MITIGATION.
SO I LOOKED UP THE CLOSEST MITIGATION RECIPIENT SITE BANKS, AND DO YOU THINK THERE'S SUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO RELOCATE THOSE MANY
TORTOISES? >> I THINK THERE'S A FEW THINGS IN PLAY RELATED TO THAT. ONE, SOME OF THAT TOOK PLACE WHEN THE EXISTING STORM WATER PONDS UNDER THAT STORM WATER PERMIT WENT ON WITH THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. AND SO SOME OF THAT WENT ON THEN, BUT ALSO THERE'S THE HUGE AREA OF RESERVE THAT'S ON THE PRD
ITSELF. >> I THOUGHT THAT WAS ABOUT 4 ACRES, 4 TO 7. 4
ACRES? >> THE PRD IS 170 ACRES.
>> WELL, YOU HAVE EITHER ON OUR PRD THE MOST LAND THAT WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO A RESERVE AREA WOULD BE EITHER 80% IS
EAST. >> OR 90% OF THE LAND IS RESERVED. YOU CAN SEE UP HERE OBVIOUSLY YOU'VE GOT THE INDIVIDUAL PADS FOR THE HOME SITES, BUT YOU HAVE RESERVE AREA AROUND THE HOME SITES AND THEN THE BIG -- OBVIOUSLY THE BIG, HUGE PORTION THAT'S EVERYTHING THAT'S NORTH AND EAST ON THE
I LIKE HOW YOU HAVE THAT PRD DESIGNED WITH THE HOME SITES AND BUFFERING THE PARK REALLY WELL THERE. THAT'S A GOOD PLAN. IF IT WAS JUST THE PRD AND THE HOME SITES THERE AND NOT ALL THE COMMERCIAL ASPECTS, INDUSTRIAL, COMMERCIAL, SO FORTH, I PROBABLY WOULD BE JUMPING UP AND DOWN ABOUT THIS THINKING IT'S PRETTY GOOD.
>> YOU DO HAVE A NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE TWO, THAT DIVIDING LINE THAT RUNS NEW YORK OR SOUTH BETWEEN THE TWO PROJECTS. AND YOU CAN SEE IT IN THIS AERIAL IF I STEP BACK.
YOU CAN SEE ALL THROUGH HERE THIS IS THAT BIG --
>> WETLAND STRAND. SO YOU CAN SEE IT ON THE MDP MAPS THAT ACCOUNT FOR IT.
SO YOU DO HAVE THAT NATURAL DIVIDING LINE BETWEEN WHERE YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE THE COMMERCIAL ON THE WEST, AND YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE CONSERVATION AND THE HOMES ON THE RIGHT.
>> SO LET ME ASK THIS. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT HERE OR NOT, BUT I KNOW THEY DID -- I ASSUME THEY DID A PEDESTRIAN SURVEY AND WALKED AROUND AND COUNTED ALL THE GOPHER BURROWS BUT IT SAID NO COMMENSALS WERE FOUND. THOSE ARE OTHER SPECIES, AS YOU WELL KNOW, THAT UTILIZE THE BURROWS AND USE AS A HABITAT.
FLORIDA MOUSE, EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE, PINE SNAKE, GOPHER FROG. IT SAID NONE OF THOSE WERE FOUND. I JUST WONDER IF YOU KNOW OFFHAND IF CAMERAS WERE INSERTED -- FIBER OPTIC CAMERAS WERE INSERTED DOWN IN THE GOPHER BURROWS TO LOOK FOR SPECIES DOWN IN THE BURROWS.
THAT'S A STANDARD PRACTICE IN A LOT OF
SURVEYS. >> I DON'T KNOW IF THAT HAS OCCURRED. I DO KNOW ONE OF THE COMMENTS COUNTY STAFF MADE AND IT'S IN THE STAFF REPORT, I BELIEVE, WHICH IS THEY -- PARDON MY SUMMARY OF IT. THEY DON'T REALLY CARE WHAT'S GOING ON IN THE PAST. WHEN YOU COME THROUGH FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR ANY PORTION OF EITHER PROJECT, BASICALLY IT'S A DO OVER, UPDATE IT ALL.
>> FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION WOULD REQUIRE THAT.
>> YES. AND FIRST I WANT TO SAY NICE VISUALS. EASY TO FOLLOW WITH THE WAY YOU'RE DOING THAT.
>> I HAVE -- I'M NOT THE EXPECT THAT DR. HILSENBACK IS ON WILD LIFE, BUT I DO HAVE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS ABOUT TIMELINE.
I WENT TO DO SOME RESEARCH ON PUD S AND START TIMES,
[02:05:01]
COMMENCEMENT. AND THERE'S PRETTY MUCH A FIVE- YEAR STANDARD FOR MOST OF THESE.IT'S HIGHLY UNUSUAL TO HAVE A COMMENCEMENT DATE EXTENDED OUT 15 YEARS, ANOTHER 15 YEARS, AND, YOU KNOW, IT SAYS A LOT. IT SAYS THAT THE MARKETPLACE IS NOT CHECKING IN RIGHT NOW ON THIS.
OTHERWISE, THERE WOULD BE A SHORTER TIME FRAME I'M SURE BECAUSE THE -- THE APPLICANT IS INTERESTED IN DEVELOPMENT. THAT LONG A PERIOD, HOW CAN YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT A PORTION OF INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL WAREHOUSE, WHATEVER WOULD BE -- MIGHT BE WHAT THE END THING THE MARKETPLACE IS ASKING FOR. I MEAN, RIGHT NOW AT THE SITE FAVOR DICE ROAD IS EXTREMELY QUIET.
I DROVE THE LENGTH OF IT AND DIDN'T MEET A SINGLE CAR TO THE PARK. THERE'S A COUPLE OAF ORANGE JUICE STANDS FOR TOURISTS AT THE INTERCHANGE. WE SOUND WE'RE GOING TO GET A TRUCK STOP THERE, WHICH IS, YOU KNOW, A LOGICAL USE AT THE INTERCHANGE.
BUT I -- I JUST -- I REALLY DON'T UNDERSTAND -- I KNOW THAT WE'RE NOT HERE TO MAKE ANY RECOMMENDATIONS ABOUT THE UNDERLINED LAND USE.
THAT'S BEEN PREVIOUSLY DECIDED, SO WE'RE LOOKING AT YOUR MODIFICATIONS. AND I GUESS I -- I THINK THE DISCUSSION OF TIMELINES PROBABLY HAS BEEN BEATEN TO DEATH MAYBE ALREADY.
BUT I DO ALSO HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT SINCE THE MARKETPLACE ISN'T ASKING FOR DEVELOPMENT RIGHT NOW, WHAT IS THE BASIS FOR REQUESTING THE ADDITIONAL BUILDING HEIGHT?
>> WELL, THAT'S AN INTERESTING THING ON THE BUILDING HEIGHT. I CAN LOOK BACK THERE AND ASK MY CLIENT. I DON'T THINK WE NEED A CHANGE TO THE BUILDING HEIGHT. I THINK WHAT YOU GET IS A BETTER BUILDING HEIGHT THAN WHAT'S IN THE PUD NOW. AND I GUESS WE COULD DEBATE THAT. RIGHT NOW OUR HOTELS ARE ALLOWED 175 ROOMS AT 50 FEET -- 55 FEET
TALL. >> YEAH, AND I UNDERSTAND THE
HOTEL. >> AND HERE'S THE THING, THOUGH, MAYBE YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE HOTELS. THERE'S NO INCREASED BUFFER FOR THE HOTEL. IT'S 55 FEET AT THE SAME BUFFER AS 35 FEET. AND SO THE LANGUAGE WE'VE PUT IN THERE IS THE STANDARD CODE LANGUAGE THAT YOU GET 5 MORE FEET OF BUFFER PER 5 FEET IT GOES UP. SO THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A TRADEOFF ON THAT ISSUE. AND THEN IT'S GOING FROM 35 FEET TO 45 FEET, WHICH REALLY IS KIND OF THE NORM FOR MOST OF YOUR INDUSTRIAL -- BECAUSE THIS IS LIGHT INDUSTRY -- OFFICE BUILDING, COMMERCIAL RETAIL. YOU SEE MANY OF THOSE STRUCTURES EXCEEDING THE 40-FOOT.
YOU SEE A LOT OF THEM AT THE 42-FOOT HEIGHT IN PARTICULAR. THAT'S WHY WE PUT IT TO 45. BUT YOU DO GET THE 45 FEET OF BUFFER TO GET TO THE SETBACK TO 45 FEET.
>> OKAY, TEMPORARY USES. HOW DO YOU -- AGAIN, SINCE THERE'S NO IMMINENT START TO THIS APPARENTLY HOW DO YOU -- WHAT IS THE BASIS OR THE NEED TO REQUEST A MODIFICATION FOR THE TEMPORARY USES?
>> I THINK I CAN ASK MY COMPLIANT ABOUT THAT.
IF THAT GIVES A PZA HEARTBURN WE BE LEAVE IT AS ORIGINAL LANGUAGE. THAT'S LANGUAGE IN PUDS COMMONLY, FOR PUDS OF THIS NATURE. THAT'S WHY IT WAS PUT IN THERE IN THIS GO AROUND TO REALLY MODERNIZE THE PUD TEXT. IF THAT'S SOMETHING THAT CAUSES HEARTBURN, I THINK I CAN TALK TO MY CLIENT ABOUT THAT AND ANSWER THAT DIRECTLY.
>> OKAY, THOSE ARE MY QUESTIONS.
>> I APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION, TOO.
IT'S REALLY GOOD. I REALLY LIKE YOUR MDP TEXT. IT WAS ACTUALLY EASY TO READ.
THANK YOU FOR THAT. THE BLUE LINE WAS VERY
HELPFUL. >> I HAVE TO GIVE SALEENA CREDITCREDIT FOR THAT, BY THE WAY, YOUR STAFF. THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS EVERY REVIEWER IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT, AND THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS SHE ALWAYS ASKS FOR IS COMPARE WHERE YOU WERE TO WHERE THE FRONTAL
PART WAS. >> THAT WAS IMPORTANT ON THIS ONE BECAUSE IT WAS A LITTLE DIFFERENT.
OKAY, SO I DO APPRECIATE THAT. I DID SPEAK WITH TERRY SHOEMAKER
[02:10:11]
OF UTILITIES AND SHE SAID, OH, YEAH, WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT THIS A REALLY LONG TIMECH AND IT IS 6 MILES OF PIPE AND THE RETURN OF CONNECTION FEES TO YOU IF YOU DID END UP HAVING TO PUT THAT IN AND IF THEY REQUIRED YOU TO PUT IN A BIGGER PIPE THAN YOU NEEDED, YOU COULD GET SOME OF THAT MONEY BACK. I'M TRYING TO WRAP MY BRAIN AROUND HOW THIS WORKS AND HAS IT BEEN DONE BEFORE. BUT SHE DID SAY THERE'S A COUPLE OF PLACES THAT NEEDED THAT MUCH.IT DID OPEN UP DEVELOPMENT FOR THE COUNTY.
I LIKE THE IDEA OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING AND I THINK THERE'S SOME MIXED USE AREAS THAT MIGHT BE REALLY GOOD FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING IF THERE'S INFRASTRUCTURE. SO, I DON'T KNOW.
THAT WAS WHAT POPPED INTO MY LITTLE BRAIN.
ON THE TIMING THING, THAT REALLY DID JUMP OUT AT ME AS WELL. IT ALMOST SOUNDS TO ME LIKE THE LANGUAGE SAYS THERE IS NO TIMING.
CAN YOU CLARIFY THAT? AFTER IT SAYS ANY TIME AFTER THE RELATED CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE CONSTRUCTION PHASE HAS BEEN COMPLETED, VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION FOR EACH PROPOSED COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RELATED TO THE SITE CONSTRUCTION WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING TIME LIMIT OF 15 YEARS FOR COMMENCEMENT WITH COMPLETION IN
FIVE. >> I THINK I CAN -- I THINK I CAN GET TO THE PUNCH LINE PRETTY QUICKLY ON THAT. AND HERE'S THE PUNCH LINE.
I THINK MY CLIENT HAS FACED A SITUATION IN THE PAST -- NOT IN ST. JOHNS COUNTY -- WHERE THAT LANGUAGE IS INTERPRETED NOT TO RELATE TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE. WE ALL READ THAT LANGUAGE AS RELATED TO THE INFRASTRUCTURE, NOT VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION. AND SOME PEOPLE MAY READ IT, AND OBVIOUSLY FOR EXAMPLE I'LL POINT AT MR. MATOVINA FOR A MOMENT BECAUSE HE PROBABLY KNOWS THIS STUFF BETTER THAN I DO THE DIFFERENCE HORIZONTAL VERTICAL ON THESE PUDS AND MY CLIENT WAS CONCERNED WE REALLY DIFFERENTIATE THE INFRASTRUCTURE VERSUS VERTICAL CONSTRUCTION.
NOW, THAT HAVING BEEN SAID, THAT'S ONE OF THOSE THINGS AS WELL IF Y'ALL WANT THE LANGUAGE BUTTONED UP, IF STAFF WANTS TO GIVE US AN EXAMPLE WHAT THEY'D LIKE TO SEE, WE CAN CERTAINLY REVISIT THAT LANGUAGE AND WHAT THE IN THE PUD --
>> THE TIME FRAME? I DON'T KNOW, WHAT'S THE DOWN SIDE WAITING THERE'S NEIGHBORS HERE LIKE MAKE IT 20 YEARS, WE'RE FINE WITH THAT. BUT THEN AGAIN, TOO, THERE'S OTHER PARTS OF THIS MOVING, WHEELS MOVING. OKAY, THE OTHER THING THAT I WANTED TO MENTION WAS TEMPORARY USES.
AND I WAS, LIKE, ALL EXCITED THINKING MAYBE WE'RE GOING TO DO A REMEMBER FAERS MARKET OR SOMETHING DOWN THERE. IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT REMOVING THAT MARKET, THERE'S NOT PLANS FOR THAT.
>> THAT IS THE TYPE OF SITUATION THAT'S CONTEMPLATED.
>> THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I WAS THINKING.
MAYBE THAT WOULD BE A GOOD SPOT FOR THAT.
ANYWAY, THAT'S THE QUESTIONS I HAVE, SIR.
>> SO FIRST OFF I WANT TO SAY THAT I KNOW WE HAVE THINGS THAT ARE, LIKE, EXPIRED PUDS IN ST.
JOHNS COUNTY. THERE ARE MANY COUNTIES WHERE PUDS DON'T EXPIRE. ACTUALLY MOST COUNTIES ARE THAT WAY THAT I'VE DEALT WITH, SO IT'S A LITTLE BIT OF AN UNUSUAL SITUATION HERE, IN MY OPINION.
SO FOR ME I HAD TO GO BACK TO WHAT'S OUR CHARGE? AND OUR CHARGE IS NOT TO DEBATE WHEN IS THE MARKET GOING TO COME, WHEN IS THIS GOING TO BE DEVELOPED, BUT DOES THE PUD PRESENT THIS PHASING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE? SO, DOUG, I'M GOING TO READ THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO YOU, AND THEN I'M GOING TO ASK YOU TO READ YOUR PHASING LANGUAGE AND MAYBE DECIDE WHETHER YOU WANT TO RELOOK AT IT AS A RESULT OF ME READING IT TO YOU. SO THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SAYS A PHASING SCHEDULE -- THIS IS THAT -- WHAT IS THAT .05. 1R WHATEVER IT IS THAT SECTION.
IT REQUIRES A PHASING SCHEDULE WHICH SHALL INCLUDE THE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PHASE. A SPECIFIC COMMENCEMENT TERM WITH A DEFINITION OF COMMENCEMENT AND A SPECIFIC COMPLETION TERM WITH A DIFFERENT DEFINITION OF COMPLETION.
SO AS I LOOK AT WHAT YOU'VE GIVEN US, I DON'T
[02:15:04]
NECESSARILY SEE THE RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL BEING BROKEN DOWN BY PHASE.AND THEN IT GOES ONTO SAY PHASING OF THE PUD MAY BE OBTAINED BY EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING TWO METHODS. SO ONE IS THE PROVISION OF AN ESTIMATE OF USES TO BE DEVELOPED WITHIN 5 TO 10- YEAR PHASES. NOW, I HAD TO READ THAT ABOUT FIVE TIMES TO TRY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I THINK IT SAYS.
AND I DON'T THINK IT SAYS YOU CAN ONLY HAVE 5 TO 10 YEARS. IT SAYS THE PHASE LENGTHS THAT YOU DICTATE FOR YOUR USES AS YOU BREAK THEM DOWN IS SUPPOSED TO BE IN 5 TO 10- YEAR PHASES. SO IF YOU HAD FOUR PHASES IN YOUR COMMERCIAL AREA, YOU COULD BE OUT 40 YEARS IS THE WAY I READ THAT. I COULD BE WRONG, BUT THAT'S THE WAY I READ THAT. AND THE ESTIMATED -- BUT WHAT KEEPS YOU FROM MAKING THAT PHASE SO SMALL SO THAT YOU COULD EXTEND IT OUT 100 YEARS IS IT THEN GOES ONTO SAY THE ESTIMATED PHASES MAY OVERLAP DURING CONSTRUCTION, HOWEVER, A PHASE MAY BE 50% COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT PHASE MAY PROCEED.
IF YOU MADE OF A PHASE OVER 2,000 SQUARE FEET OF INDUSTRIAL, OBVIOUSLY I THINK YOU'D BE KIND OF HOSING YOURSELF THERE. IT WOULDN'T WORK OUT VERY WELL FOR YOU. YOUR OTHER OPTION, THOUGH, IS YOU CAN PROVIDE -- FOR THE PROVISION OF THE NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS OR NONRESIDENTIAL UNIT SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT COMPRISE A PHASE AND THE PROVISION OF SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS RELATED TO THE SPECIFIC PHASE, E.G. , PRIOR TO PLATTING OF 100 DWELLING UNITS, A PARK SHALL BE PROVIDED.
SO THAT APPEARS TO BE YOUR OTHER
OPTION. >> THIS ISN'T GOING TO APPLY BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE 100 UNITS.
>> WELL, NOW THAT'S AN EXAMPLE.
>> SO I'M NOT TELLING YOU WHAT TO DO.
I'M JUST ASKING YOU -- I'M NOT SURE YOUR PHASING SCHEDULE RIGHT NOW COMPLIES WITH EITHER OF ONE OR TWO HERE. I'M NOT SAYING IT COULDN'T.
FOR INSTANCE, TWO COULD BE THAT PHASE ONE DOESN'T HAVE TO START UNTIL WATER AND SEWER IS BROUGHT TO THE SITE PERHAPS. I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. BUT I'M ASKING YOU IF YOU THINK WHAT YOU HAVE RIGHT NOW COMPLIES?
>> I THINK IT DOES BUT I THINK TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IT RIGHT NOW.
AND I THINK THAT OVERALL YOU COULD HAVE THIS AS ESSENTIALLY YOU REALLY LOOK AT IT IT'S ONE 15-YEAR PHASE. AND WHAT'S NOT CONTEMPLATED HERE AND WHAT SOME OF US WOULD KNOW A PHASE JUST BECAUSE IT SAYS IT'S A FBI- YEAR, TEN- YEAR, 15- YEAR PHASE WHEN YOU COME THROUGH TO DO YOUR CONSTRUCTION PLANS YOU CAN PHASE YOUR CONSTRUCTION PLANS. EVEN IF IN YOUR PUD YOU HAVE ONE 15- YEAR PHASE, WHEN YOU COME IN AND DO YOUR PROJECT, YOU CAN DO 20 UNITS OF RESIDENTIAL WITH 100,000 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL AND THEN YOU CAN PHASE YOUR CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO DO THAT, TO DO THE BALANCE. IT WOULDN'T MATTER IF IT'S ONE FIVE- YEAR PHASE OR ONE TEN- EYEAR PHASE YOU CAN ALWAYS PHASE YOUR CONSTRUCTION PLANS. IT'S KIND OF INTERESTING BECAUSE IF YOU CUT OUT THE LANGUAGE AND SAID ONE PHASE UNTIL 2040, THEN YOU PHASE THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND IT'S ALL DONE AT THE SAME
TIME. >> I DIDN'T REALLY FOLLOW THAT, BUT THIS DOESN'T ALLOW YOU A 15-YEAR PHASE AS I READ IT.
IT ALLOWS YOU TO 5 TO 10- YEAR PHASE AS I RED IT TO.
AND IT SAYS YOU HAVE TO BREAK OUT A RESIDENTIAL FROM A NONRESIDENTIAL. OR YOU GO TO NUMBER TWO WHERE YOU DON'T HAVE TO DICTATE A TIME FRAME. AND YOU JUST DICTATE THIS STARTS WHEN "X" HAPPENS. THAT'S THE WAY I READ THIS ANYWAY. SO THAT WASN'T REALLY A QUESTION, AND I'M NOT HERE TO
>> I JUST ASKED YOU THE QUESTION EARLIER, AND I I'LL LEAVE IT AT
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT, WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ONTO PUBLIC COMMENT. IF THERE'S ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE HERE TO SPEAK ON ITEMS 8 OR 9, PLEASE COME
FORWARD. >> HI, EDWARD GRIFFON, 444 IN ST. AUGUSTINE. I WANTED TO SPEAK ON THE EXIT.
IT'S KIND OF A CHICKEN AND THE EGG SITUATION. MY FAMILY OWNS THREE BUSINESSES ON THAT EXIT AND ABOUT 120 ACRES DOWN US1 FAVOR FAVOR DYKES ON I-95. IF WE CAN GET COUNTY WATER AND SEWAGE ON THAT EXIT, THAT EXIT IS GOING TO
[02:20:03]
BLOW UP. DO WE HAVE A TIME FRAME ON WHEN COUNTY SEWAGE AND WATER IS COMING? THAT SAY MY ONLY QUESTION DOES IT MOVE FROM 2022 TO 2040 OR SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN?>> ANYONE ELSE WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THESE TWO ITEMS? OKAY. MR. BURNETT.
>> YOU KNOW, I JUST WILL STATE THE OBVIOUS.
I THINK WE LISTEN TO WHATEVER RECOMMENDATION THE PZA WANTS TO MAKE. I THINK ON THE ISSUE OF PHASING AND THE LANGUAGE THAT GOES IN THE PUD, I WOULD RESPECTFULLY SUGGEST TO THE BOARD THAT WE CAN RESOLVE THAT WITH STAFF BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BASED ON THE COMMENT ESPECIALLY THAT YOU'VE RAISED, MR. MATOVINA.
WE WANT TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CODE. WORKING THROUGH THAT AND LOOKING THROUGH THAT OUR PHASE WAS ORIGINALLY A TEN-YEAR PHASE FOR THE OVERALL PROJECT. SO LOOKING AT GETTING PHASED CORRECTLY.
AND, IN FACT, I'VE ASKED STAFF TO -- BEFORE THE HEARING STARTED KNOWING THIS MAY COME UP.
IF THEY WOULD SEND US A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES OF RECENT APPROVED PUDS THAT HAS SOME PHASING LANGUAGE IN IT WE COULD MIRROR UP OR AT LEAST ANALYZE BETWEEN NOW AND THE BCC. SO THAT'S HOW WE WOULD RECOMMEND HANDLING THAT OR AT LEAST SUGGEST WE HANDLE THAT IS TO GET WITH STAFF AND TAKE A LOOK AT THAT BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER MEETING.
>> OKAY. WOULD YOU MIND ANSWERING THE GENTLEMAN'S QUESTION. JUST DO YOU HAVE AN IDEA? I KNOW THE COUNTY'S NOT PLANNING -- IS THE COUNTY PLANNING ON BRINGING WATER AND SEWER? AND IF THEY'RE NOT, I KNOW YOU HAVE TO BRING IT. DO YOU HAVE AN ESTIMATED TIME LINE OF WHEN THAT WOULD
HAPPEN? >> I DON'T AT THIS STAGE.
YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD SOME START AND GOES.
YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY MY CLIENT'S OWNED THE LAND FOR 25 YEARS. JUST TO PUT IT IT CONTEXT FOR YOU, THIS IS A LONG- TERM LANDHOLDER.
THEY DID THE COMMERCIAL IN FRONT ARCHUM SPRINGS IN FRONT OF RACETRACK ROAD. IT SAT THERE FOR MANY, MANY YEARS WHERE IT'S DEVELOPED AND DEVELOPING AND TENANTS IN THERE.
SO ANYWAYS, I DON'T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT.
JUST KNOW YOU DO HAVE AN OWNER HERE THAT HAS A LONG- TERM COMMITMENT TO THE COUNTY.
>> A LOT OF QUESTIONS HAVE ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED.
I'M CONCERNED ABOUT THE BUILDING HEIGHT. I REALLY AM.
EXTENDING THAT OUT IS DEFINITELY A CONCERN.
ALSO YOU'VE GOT SAND HILL THAT'STHAT'S PRESERVED IN THERE RIGHT NOW OF 7.64 ACRES. AND YOU'RE GOING TO CUT THAT DOWN TO 1 ACRE. IS THERE A REASON FOR THAT?
>> IT'S NECESSARY IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT THE
PROJECT. >> WHEREABOUTS IS THAT LOCATED ON THE MAP?
>> I'LL HAVE TO ASK QUENTIN TO COME HELP ME ON THAT ONE.
AND DO YOU HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION AS WELL, OR WAS THAT
IT? >> ONE HAS ALREADY BEEN ANSWERE. THAT'S PRETTY MUCH IT.
AND I'D ALSO IF POSSIBLE EXEMPT VAPE SHOPS ON
THAT AREA. >> QUINTAN, REAL QUICK MR. LABANOWSKI IS ALSO ASKING ABOUT NOT ONLY CAN WE PROHIBIT ADULT USES, CAN WE PROHIBIT VAPE SHOPS?
>> WE PUT THOSE IN THE NUISANCE CATEGORY.
AND TYPICALLY ANY RETAILER THAT WE BRING IN, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A NUISANCE CLAUSE IN THEIR LEASE AND THEY WON'T ALLOW IT IN THE CENTER. BUT THAT'S NOT AN ISSUE.
>> HE'S ALSO ASKING ABOUT THE SAND HILL AND WHERE THE SAND HILL AREA
IS. >> YEAH, IT'S SHOWN ON THERE.
I CAN'T SEE IT THAT WELL, BUT IT'S MARKED ON THE SITE PLAN. AND ACTUALLY THIS MAP'S A LITTLE DECEIVING.
AND CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT IN THE PRD OFF TO THE RIGHT WHERE YOU HAVE THE GRAY AREA --
>> LET ME GO BACK TO THE RECORDER PRD.
IF YOU GO ABOVE THE RESIDENTIAL TO THE RIGHT, ALL OF THAT AREA IS A CONSERVATION AREA.
>> WHAT WE DID WHEN WE MET WITH PLANNING AND THE PRD WOULD ONLY ALLOW US THE -- WE ENDED UP, I THINK, WITH 37 LOTS. WE HAD THE OPTION TO
[02:25:05]
SCATTER THOSE 37 THROUGHOUT THE 160 ACRES AND JUST MAKE LARGER LOTS. BUT WE OPTED TO PULL IT DOWN TO A MORE CONCISE, USE THE RETENTION POND LAKE THAT WAS ALREADY IN EXISTENCE AND THEN ALLOW MORE AREA FOR CONSERVATION. AND IF YOU LOOK AT IT SOMEWHERE ALONG THE RIGHT- HAND SIDE WE'VE ALSO PROVIDED A TRAIL THAT CONNECTS UP TO THE PARK. THE ENTIRE NORTH -- I GUESS IT'S NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS A PARK CURRENTLY.AND SO THIS PROPERTY CONNECTS TO PARK TO THE NORTH, ON PAST THAT, ON PAST OUR PROPERTY LINE. AND THERE IS A TRAIL COMING DOWN THE RIGHT- HAND SIDE FROM THE ROAD THAT ALLOWS YOU TO GET UP INTO THAT TRAIL.
>> SO, WHERE AGAIN, GO BACK TO WHY ARE WE REMOVING THE MAJORITY OF THE SAND HILL OUT OF PRESERVE TO CONSERVATION? WHAT'S
HAPPENING? >> WE'RE NOT MAKING ANY CHANGE TO THE SITE PLAN. THERE'S ZERO CHANGE TO THE SITE PLAN WE'RE ASKING FOR TODAY. THERE'S ZERO CHANGE. THE SAND HILL WE'REASKING FOR AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION, NO CHANGE TO ANY ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION AT THE SITE AT ALL IN THE SITE COMPARED TO THE EXISTING PUD OR PRD. THERE'S NO
CHANGE. >> BECAUSE THERE WAS LANGUAGE IN THERE IT WAS REDUCING IT DOWN TO ONLY 1
>> IF THAT'S WHAT OCCURRED PREVIOUSLY --
>> AND JUST -- I DON'T WANT TO BACKTRACK ANY, BUT YOU TALK ABOUT THE TIMING, AND CERTAINLY THAT IS AN ISSUE BECAUSE IT'S BEEN AN ISSUE WITH THE OWNER. AND REAL ESTATE RUNS CYCLES.
AND WE'VE SEEN IT, AND WE HAVE THINGS THAT WE CAN'T PREDICT SUCH AS COVID.
THERE WAS A COUPLE TIMES WE HAD PEOPLE PRETTY INTERESTED, AND THEY BACKED OFF. YOU DID THE HOMEWORK, DOCTOR, AND THE RUN IS A LITTLE OVER 6 MILES TO GET WATER AND SEWER TO THE PROPERTY. AND WE DID AN ESTIMATE THROUGH AN ENGINEER. IT'S A LITTLE OVER $8 MILLION, AND THE COUNTY WAS GOING TO CONTRIBUTE TO THAT SO WE COULD UPSERVICE THE LINES TO SERVICE PEOPLE ALONG THE WAY.
BUT THAT'S A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT ON A SPECK PIECE OF LAND. WE NEED SOMEBODY TO KICK IT OFF, AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO.
AND IT'LL TAKE PROBABLY OVER THREE YEARS, MAYBE MORE TO PERMIT, GET RIGHT-OF- WAYS, GET CITY APPROVAL, GET DISCIP ESIGN TO EVEN START TO LOOK AT THAT. IT TAKES A LONG TIME. AND IT'S A SUBSTANTIAL COST.
WE'RE CURRENTLY TALKING TO ANOTHER DEVELOPER WHO'S GOT A PIECE OF LAND ON WHAT I WOULD CALL THE SOUTH SIDE OF 95 OR THE WEST SIDE AND TRYING TO MAYBE PUT SOMETHING TOGETHER WITH THEM TO OFFSET THE COST FOR BOTH OF US. SO WE'RE CURRENTLY WORKING ON IT.
BUT IT DOES TAKE TIME. AND WE HAVE -- I THINK YOU MENTIONED -- I WILL 32. BUT THE WAY THE ORIGINAL WORDING WAS WRITTEN AND I THINK IT SAYS IT IN THEIR REVIEW IS THAT'S TO COMPLETE THE JOB. IT WAS TEN YEARS TO START AND FIVE YEARS TO COMPLETE. WELL, THE COMPLETION DATE IN THAT LETTER WITH THE EXTENSIONS IS 32. SO THAT WOULD MEAN BACK THAT UP FIVE YEARS, WE'VE GOT TO START BY '27.
AND WE SIMPLY CAN'T DO THAT WITH THE WATER AND SEWER ISSUE THAT WE HAVE GOING.
SO WE'RE TRYING TO BUILD IN ENOUGH TIME WHERE WE CAN DO IT ORDERLY, HAVE A GOOD PROJECT FOR THE AREA THAT'S NOT RUSHED. WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY DEVELOPMENT HARDLY AT ALL DOWN THERE SINCE WE STARTED THIS PROJECT AND VERY LITTLE INTEREST.
BUT WE'RE REALLY EMBOLDENED BY WHAT'S HAPPENING TO US.
THAT AREA HAS REALLY DEVELOPED. AND SO WE -- WE THINK THIS IS COMING DOWN. THIS IS A GATEWAY INTO YOUR COUNTY FROM YOUR SIDE. AND WE DON'T WANT TO PUT SOMETHING UP THERE THAT DOESN'T REPRESENT THE COUNTY WELL. SO THAT'S THE REASON WE'RE ASKING FOR THE ADDITIONAL TIME, TO TRY TO GET THISTHIS THING, GET WATER AND SEWER DOWN AND PUT IT TOGETHER. BUT WE'VE MADE NO CHANGES WHATSOEVER IN THE SITE PLAN IN EITHER ONE
[02:30:05]
OF THEM FROM THE -- WELL, FROM 209 OR 212, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.>> AND BY THE WAY, FOR THE RECORD, QUENTIN PERRY, SAME ADDRESS FOR YOU'RE LOOKING FOR AN ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. MR. LABANOWSKI, I WAS LOOKING AND I ACTUALLY PULLED UP THE PRD TEXT FROM THE 2012 APPROVAL SO I COULD KEYWORD SEARCH THE ACTUAL PRD TEXT IN A WORD DOCUMENT BECAUSE I DRAFTED IT BACK THEN.
SO I WAS ABLE TO PULL IT UP AND FIND THE LANGUAGE. AND THIS AREA UP HERE WHERE THIS GRAY SHADOW IS, WHAT THE PRD TEXT TALKS ABOUT IS IT SAYS THERE'S A TOTAL OF 6. 4 ACRES OF SAND HILL AND APPROXIMATELY 5.89 ACRES IN THE NORTH EASTERN PORTION OF THE PRD WILL BE PRESERVED IN ITS ENTIRETY AND IS ACTUALLY CONTIGUOUS TO OFF- SITE SAND HILL COMMUNITY AND FAVOR DYKES STATE PARK.
IT'S NOT GOING DOWN TO HALF AN ACRE OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IT LOOKS LIKE 6. 4 ACRES.
>> I JUST HAVE A LITTLE COMMENT. I JUST WANT TO ADDRESS SOMETHING THAT WAS IN THE MDP FOR THE PUD.
AND I DON'T KNOW WHERE THIS CAME FROM AND IF IT'S A THING, BUT I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU HONOR FOR THIS. IT SAYS LARGE USERS, TENANTS GREATER THAN 20,000 SQUARE FEET OR WILDLIFE AREAS CAN BE EQUIPPED WITH DEFIBRILLATORS AND PERSONNEL SHALL BE CONDUCTED BY SUCH BUSINESSES HAVING TO MEET THIS REQUIREMENT, AND THAT'S GREAT.
AND I JUST DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A REQUIREMENT OR SOMETHING, BUT I LOVED READING THAT.
>> I THINK THAT WAS -- WAS THAT BLUE TEXT OR THAT'S
ORIGINAL. >> YEAH, THAT'S ORIGINAL.
AND I THINK PART OF THAT WAS THE LOCATION OF THE PROJECT AND THE CONCERN ABOUT
RESPONSE TIMES. >> BEING AWAY FROM HOSPITALS AND STUFF. IT'S GOOD.
>> BUT THERE'S A LOT OF FIRE SERVICE LANGUAGE THAT WAS UPDATED THIS GO AROUND, TOO, JUST TO MODERNIZE IT TO WHAT THEIR CURRENT STANDARDS ARE.
>> I'M PREPARED TO MAKE A MOTION, BUT I WANT TO SAY A FEW WORDS FIRST IF THAT'S OKAY, MADAM CHAIRMAN, CHAIR PERSON.
SO IF THIS SITE WERE LOCATED AT 207 WHERE THIS IS SEWER RIGHT NOW, WE WOULD PROBABLY BE APPLAUDING THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT, THE DENSITY AND INTENSITY PARTICULARLY BECAUSE WE'D BE GETTING A PRD, WHERE NORMALLY SOMEONE WOULD PROBABLY BE PROPOSING TO PUT APARTMENTS, QUITE FRANKLY. SO THE USES THAT ARE PROPOSED HERE ARE ONE DAY GOING TO MAKE SENSE FOR THIS INTERSECTION.
SO I'M NOT SURE THAT NECESSARILY WE WANT TO PUSH BACK AGAINST THE APPLICANT HERE PARTICULARLY BECAUSE AS I READ THESE PUDS, FOR EACH PUD THEY HAVE TO HAVE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FROM ST. JOHNS COUNTY TO PROCEED WITH DEVELOPMENT INCLUDING FROM THE PRD, WHICH YOU DON'T NORMALLY GET IN A PRD. YOU NORMALLY GET WELL AND SEPTIC TANK. SO AS IT STANDS RIGHT NOW FOR THEM TO PROCEED WITH A VERY LOW DENSITY DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ITEM NUMBER 9, NOT ITEM NUMBER 8, THEY'VE GOT TO RUN WATER AND SEWER IN THERE.
SO THE TIME FRAME DOESN'T REALLY CONCERN ME OTHER THAN THE FACT THAT I BELIEVE THAT THEY NEED TO WRITE THEIR PHASING PARAGRAPH TO COMPLY WITH THAT PARTICULAR SECTION. AND SO FOR ITEM "A" I AM GOING TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATIONF APPROVAL FOR MAJOR MODIFICATION 2024- 04 HYDE PARK PUD BASED UPON SIX FINDINGS OF FACT, AS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT WITH THE ADDED CONDITION THAT THE APPLICANT WILL BETWEEN NOW AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ENSURE THAT THEIR PHASING PARAGRAPH COMPLIES WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 5.03.02.G.01.R.
>> IF YOU DON'T MIND I SECOND THE MOTION WITH SOME COMMENTS BECAUSE I WAS GETTING READY TO MAKE A MOTION. AND I SORT OF AGREE WITH THE PHASING.
IT WAS -- I'LL LET THE COUNTY COMMISSION FIGURE THAT OUT. BUT THERE'S NO SECRET THE REASON NOTHING'S DEVELOPED DOWN THERE, AND THERE'S A PROPERTY OWNER % BEHIND YOU, THERE'S JUST NO WATER AND SEWER THERE. AND ONCE THAT COMES IN, YOU'RE
[02:35:02]
GOING TO SEE ALL FOUR OF THOSE CORNERS GET DEVELOPED.AND I GUESS YOUR CLIENTS WANT TO GET TO FOOT THE BILL IT LOOKS LIKE. BUT I MEAN, WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT THIS YOU'RE COMING IN FOR AESTHETIC LOOKS.
I MEAN, YOU'RE TRYING TO IMPROVE THE INTERCONNECTIVITY OF THE PROPERTY, MAKE TRAFFIC FLOW BETTER ROUNDABOUT, BETTER SIGNAGE. YOU'RE TAKING OUT THE ADULT ENTERTAINMENT PROVISION. I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT. I'M GOING TO SUPPORT IT.
GUESS. >> A MOTION FOR APPROVAL AND A SECOND. ANY FURTHER
I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING MR. QUINTAN PERRY UP TO SPEAK.
I THOUGHT THAT WAS VERY HELPFUL. I LIKE WHAT HE HAD TO SAY. I'M SYMPATHETIC WITH HIM AS A LONG- TIME OWNER AND HIS EXPLANATIONS.
I THOUGHT HE WAS VERY WELL-SPOKEN AND I LIKED WHAT HE HAD TO SAY. BUT, YOU KNOW, LOOKING AT THE COMPATIBILITY ANALYSIS, THAT'S FIGURE ONE THAT'S ON PAGE 14 OF THE APPLICATION MATERIALS THAT WE RECEIVE IN OUR PACKET. I LOOK AT THIS AND LOOK ATAT ZONING AND WHAT THE DENSITY INTENSITY AND SO FORTH, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AND PROPOSED.
THIS IS FOR THE PUD, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, MULTIFAMILY. WHAT'S TO THE NORTH, FAVOR DYKES STATE PARK. TO THE SOUTH TIMBERLAND, TO THE EAST IT SAYS PROPOSED PENDING RESIDENTIAL.
THAT'S PRD WEST M AND TO THE WEST CONVENIENCE STORE RETAIL. AND I'VE BEEN IN THOSE STORES BEFORE SEVERAL TIMES. SO LOOKING AT THAT, I JUST DON'T SEE RIGHT NOW THAT SUCH AN INTENSE DEVELOPMENT -- AND I AGREE IF THIS WERE AT 207 AND I-95, WE'D BE APPLAUDING IT. BUT WAY DOWN THERE, I -- I DON'T SEE IT BEING COMPATIBLE. THAT'S MY OPINION UNDER COMP PLAN POLICY 1.3.11.
>> UNDER THE FINDINGS OF FACT TABLE, DENYING IT, IT SAYS NUMBER 6, THIS REQUEST IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH POLICY 8.1.3. 11 OF THE 2025 ST. JOHNS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IN THAT IT AFFECTS THE ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY AND IS NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA. THAT'S WHY I ASK YOU SO WHAT ARE THE DEVELOPMENT TRENDS DOWN THERE? I DON'T THINK I EVER ACTUALLY GOT AN ANSWER, BUT --
THOUGH. >> IT IS, RIGHT. IT'S NOT PART -- I DON'T SEE THIS AS PART OF AN ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT OF ST. JOHNS COUNTY WHEN IT'S OVER 6 MILES FROM CURRENT SEWER AND WATER AND YOU WANT SUCH INTENSIVE USES OUT THERE, SO THAT'S -- THAT'S MY OPINION INTERPRETING INCOMPATIBILITY STATEMENT OF THE COMP PLAN AND SO FORTH.
SO THE TIME FRAME DOES BOTHER ME, BUT I JUST -- I DON'T THINK IT'S COMPATIBLE.
I UNDERSTAND IT WAS APPROVED IN 2009 AND '12 AND HERE WE ARE AGAIN IN 2025. I JUST CAN'T SUPPORT IT, BUT I APPRECIATE THE PRESENTATION. AND MR. -- MR. PERRY'S STATEMENTS, I LIKE THOSE A LOT. SO THAT'S IT.
>> DID YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE TO
ADD? >> I DID HAVE SOMETHING ELSE TO SAY. SO WHEN WE LOOK AT COMPATIBILITY NORMALLY WE'RE LOOKING AT A PARCEL WHERE THE ZONING WAS CHANGING AND WE'RE COMPARING IT TO THE PARCELS AROUND IT. THIS IS GOING TO SOUND ODD, BUT THE REALITY HERE IS THIS PARCEL IS ALREADY ZONED, SO THE COMPATIBILITY ISSUE IS NOT ONE THAT'S BEFORE US TODAY BECAUSE IT ALREADY HAS THE ZONING -- THE PROPERTY IN AND OF ITSELF IS COMPATIBLE, MIGHT HAPPEN, IT IS ZONED. AND THE PROPERTY IN AND OF ITSELF WAS DEEMED TO HAVE SOME SORT OF TREND THAT DIDN'T VIOLATE THAT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISION.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROVISION WAY BACK WHEN, SO I DON'T SEE WHERE THAT APPLIES, QUITE FRANKLY. WE'RE NOT CHANGING THE ZONING, SO THE MAP THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT ALREADY HAS THE ZONING.
VERY DIFFICULT TO EXPLAIN, BUT ANYWAY THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO
SAY. >> OKAY, THERE'S NO ONE ON THE QUEUE SO NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. LET'S REGISTER THE % VOTE. ALL RIGHT, THAT MOTION PASSES
[02:40:03]
4-3. AND MR. MATOVINA, WOULD YOU MIND MAKING THE NEXT MOTION?>> SO I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF MAJOR MODIFICATION 2025- 06 HYDE PARK PRD BASED UPON SIX FINDING OF FACTS AS PROVIDED IN THE STAFF REPORT AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITION THAT THE PHASING PROVISION BE BROUGHT INTO COMPLIANCE, IF IT'S NOT ALREADY IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION
SECOND. >> ANY DISCUSSION ON THAT ONE? SEEING NONE, LET'S REGISTER TO VOTE. THAT MOTION PASSES 4-3. THANK YOU, MR. BURNETT.
ITEM NUMBER 10 HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN, SO WE'RE ONTO STAFF
REPORTS. >> NO STAFF REPORT, MADAM
ANY AGENCY REPORTS? NONE, ALL RIGHT.
WE ARE -- MR. LABANOWSKI. YOU GOT IN AT THE LAST
MINUTE. >> I COULDN'T GET THERE FAST ENOUGH. I NOTE ALL THESE MEETINGS I SEE THE BCC MEETING AS WELL IS HERE.
THERE'S BEEN A LOT PRESENTED UP ON THE BOARD THERE BEHIND US OR IN FRONT OF US THAT WE DON'T SEE IN ADVANCE.
HOW HARD IS IT TO GET SOME OF THESE PRESENTATIONS IN ADVANCE THAT GIVES A BETTER LAYOUT? I MEAN HE SHOWED A -- MR. BURNETT SHOWED A NUMBER OF THINGS UP THERE THAT WAS NOT IN OUR STAFF REPORT.
IS IT POSSIBLE TO GET THAT INFORMATION? IN ADVANCE OF THE PRESENTATION.
>> TO MR. LABANOWSKI'S QUESTION, SO STAFF TYPICALLY RECEIVES PRESENTATIONS FROM APPLICANTS APPROXIMATELY 24 HOURS BEFORE THESE HEARINGS.
WE'VE TRIED IN THE PAST TO HAVE A LONGER WINDOW OF TIME, BUT -- I DON'T KNOW, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE BOARD IF THE BOARD WANTS THOSE PRESENTATIONS AHEAD OF TIME, I CAN ASK THOSE APPLICANTS AND WE CAN TRY TO PASS THEM ALONG AS PART OF YOUR STAFF PACKETS, BUT IT WILL STILL BE SHORT
>> YES. JUST AN AGENCY COMMENT. I JUST WANTED TO ACKNOWLEDGE JASMINE'S HELP AND WONDERFUL WORK FOR US AND WISH HER THE VERY BEST.
AT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND TELL HER SHE WILL BE GREATLY MISSED, AND WE APPRECIATE YOU AND YOUR BABY'S PICTURES, TOO.
>>
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.