[Call meeting to order] [00:00:34] >> CALL THE SEPTEMBER 9TH ZONING AND ADJUSTMENT BOARD . WE WILL START WITH THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. NEXT WE WILL HAVE OUR READING . THANK YOU. THIS IS A PROPERLY NOTICED PUBLIC HEARING FOR ORDINANCE FOR THE REQUIREMENT OF THE CITY BOARD . PUBLIC WILL BE GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO COMMENT AND BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO OFFER COMMENT AT A DESIGNATED TIME. ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC DESIRES TO SPEAK CAN FILL OUT THE SIGN IN SHEET. THE PUBLIC SHALL SPEAK FOR A LENGTH OF TIME DESIGNATED. SPEAKERS SHOULD IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AND WHO THEY REPRESENT AND STATE THEIR ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD. IF THEY DO NOT THE TESTIMONY BY THE AGENCY IN DETERMINING THEIR TESTIMONY. THE PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL TO ANY DECISION MADE SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD ABLE TO ENSURE A VERBATIM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY ANY PHYSICAL OR DIAGRAMS , CHARTS, PHOTOGRAPHS , STATEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CLERK. THE RECORD WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR THESE COMMITTEES OR THE COUNTY RELATING TO THE ITEM. THE BEGINNING OF EACH ITEM SHOULD STATE WHETHER THEY HAD ANY OTHER PERSON REGARDING THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ITEM OUTSIDE THE HEARING. IF SUCH COMMUNICATION OCCURRED THEY SHOULD IDENTIFY THE PERSONS INVOLVED AND MATERIAL CONTENT. WE WILL BE RESPECTFUL IF WE DISAGREE. WE WILL DIRECT ALL COMMENTS TO THE ISSUES AND AVOID PERSONAL ATTACKS. >> THANK YOU. UP NEXT WE HAVE MINUTES FOR BOARD APPROVAL FOR THE 7/8/24 MEETING. >> I DID NOT GET A COPY. >> CAN WE SHELF THAT ? THANK YOU. NOW WE OPEN FOR PUBLIC [1. PVZVAR 2023-16 Miles Residence (532 Morning Side). Request for a Zoning Variance to Section VIII.N of the Ponte Vedra Zoning District Regulations to allow for an eight (8) foot fence in the rear yard in lieu of the six (6) foot maximum height.] COMMENT TO ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA. IF ANYBODY HAS ANY COMMENT NOT RELATED TO AN AGENDA ITEM NOW IS THE TIME. SEEING DONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC COMMENT AND WE ARE GOING TO START WITH THE VERY FIRST ITEM . THE MILES RESIDENCE. BEFORE WE HEAR IF ANYBODY HAS -- >> ABOUT SEVEN WEEKS AGO WHICH I MAY BE MISPRONOUNCING ASKED IF I WAS FAMILIAR WITH THIS APPLICATION. HE EXPRESSED HE WAS NOT IN FAVOR . >> I DID VISIT THE SITE . NO ONE WAS HOME. I HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO ANYONE. >> NO INTERACTION. >> I VISITED THE SITE AND SPOKE THIS MORNING. WE DISCUSSED WHAT HE WAS LOOKING FOR OUT OF THIS. [00:05:01] IF YOU CAN GIVE US THE PRESENTATION. >> I'M TALKING ABOUT MY REAR FRIENDS. I REALIZED I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME. WE MOVED IN TO THE PROPERTY IN 2015. THERE IS A DRAINAGE MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY AND WHEN WE MOVED IN THE FENCE WAS SIX FEET TALL. EVERY WEEK THERE WAS A LOT OF OVERGROWTH FROM THAT . IT WAS NO LONGER MAINTAINED. PART OF MY PROCESS I WILL SHOW SOME PICTURES IN A MINUTE. ONE OF THESE HURRICANES I DECIDED I'M GOING TO MOVE IT . I WILL SHOW SOME PICTURES. NO ONE CAN ACTUALLY SEE THE FENCE . NONE OF THEM HAVE HAD ISSUES. ONLY TWO MORE FEET WOULD MAKE AN IMPACT IN THE AMOUNT OF YARD WORK INSTEAD OF HAVING TO DEAL WITH OVERGROWTH. REALLY AT THE END OF THE SUMMER WHEN IT GETS OVER. THAT'S REALLY IT. I WILL SHOW SOME PICTURES OF WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. I'VE GOT AN EIGHT FOOT FENCE. I WASN'T TRYING TO GO AGAINST THE COUNTY. HERE IS MY PROPERTY. THE ORANGE PROPERTY IS THE PROPERTY BEHIND IT . YOU CAN KIND OF SEE THE EASEMENT . EVEN IF I WANTED TO HOP OVER EITHER MYSELF OR THE FOLKS TO THE EAST COULD EVEN GO BACK THERE THEY WOULD HAVE TO GO THROUGH MASSIVE HEDGE . FOR ME, I CAN'T GET ON THE OTHER SIDE . HERE'S ANOTHER PICTURE. YOU CAN KIND OF GET A SENSE TO THE EAST I WOULD SAY 15 FEET WIDE TO WHERE THE HEDGE IS AND IT IS THICK BACK THERE. THE PROPERTY OF THE SOUTH AND THE NORTH WAS OR STILL IS SO I THINK THIS ISN'T -- IT'S A UNIQUE SITUATION TO MY HOUSE. I HAVE APPROVAL FROM 530, 534 AND ALL MY ADJACENT NEIGHBORS THAT HAVE NO ISSUES WITH THIS . THEY CAN'T EVEN SEE THE FENCE. YOU CAN'T SEE IT FROM MORNING SIDE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WOULD CALL IT A HARDSHIP. THAT SEEMS LIKE AN EXTREME WORD. THE AMOUNT OF YARD WORK I'VE HAD TO DO TO MAINTAIN AND THE SAVINGS I'VE HAD TO DO I THOUGHT IT WAS WORTH POSING MY POSITION . IF YOU DISAGREE THAT'S FINE. HERE IS THE PICTURE OF THE FENCE . YOU CAN KIND OF GET A SENSE FOR OVERGROWTH BEHIND IT . I'M SHOWING STANDING WATER. IT IS A CONSTANT BATTLE CREEPING OVER. THIS IS MORE OF IT. IT SOUNDS SILLY TO ME THAT TWO FEET WOULD MAKE THAT MUCH OF A DIFFERENT. IT HAS. THIS IS JUST A PICTURE FROM ONE STREET WE ARE TALKING [00:10:04] ABOUT. YOU CAN'T SEE IT AT ALL. ANYWHERE. I UNDERSTAND CONCERNS ABOUT THIS AND IT'S MORE OF AN ISSUE WITH OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS. IT'S A REALLY HARD SPOT TO MAINTAIN. I APPRECIATE THAT. HERE IS ANOTHER PICTURE. YOU CAN KIND OF GET A SENSE . THAT'S IT. >> ALL RIGHT. WE WILL OPEN FOR ANY PUBLIC COMMENT RELATING TO PVZAR 2023-16 . ANY PUBLIC COMMENT? SEEING NONE I WILL CLOSE THAT. BOARD QUESTIONS, COMMENTS? >> THERE WAS A CORRESPONDENCE THAT HAD THAT ON THE RECORD. THANK YOU. >> WE HAVE AN EMAIL NOT SUPPORTING THE VARIANCE . >> CAN I COMMENT ON THAT? >> WE LOOKED UP HER ADDRESS. IF YOU LOOK AT HER EMAIL SAYING SHE'S CONCERNED SHE IS TO THE SOUTHEAST OF MY PROPERTY. HER EMAIL IS SUGGESTING SHE'S WORRIED ABOUT AN EIGHT FOOT FENCE THAT IF IT WERE TO GO UP WOULD CAUSE AN ISSUE . SHE CAN'T EVEN SEE MY FENCE. SHE'S NOT AWARE THAT ALREADY HAVE ONE IN PLACE. SHE CANNOT VIEW MY FENCE . I JUST THOUGHT THAT WAS WORTH MENTIONING. >> THE PROPERTY BEHIND 516 , WHAT IS THE RULE ON GOING ON SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY IF YOU HAVE AN OVERGROWTH PROBLEM OR ADJACENT PROBLEM? >> YOU WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GO ON SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY. SAME CAN YOU TELL US IF THERE'S ANY COUNTY RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT? >> DURING MY RESEARCH I COULDN'T FIND AN AGREEMENT. IT APPEARS THAT IS PARTIALLY OWNED . THAT LINE YOU SEE OF WHAT WE ARE LOOKING AT -- YEAH. THIS IS TWO SEPARATE PLATS. THE ADJACENT ONE , THAT EASEMENT IS PART OF THE TWO PROPERTIES. THEY HAVE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY . THERE IS DOCUMENTATION. THERE IS A CHANCE WE POSSIBLY WOULD HAVE MAINTAINED IT. THAT IS MY ASSUMPTION. THAT WOULD BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. >> THE EASEMENT IS ACTUALLY OWNED TO THE EAST. >> THAT'S CORRECT. >> WE THINK THE FENCE IS LOCATED ON THE BACK? >> THAT'S CORRECT. ON THE BACK PROPERTY. >> NO. I MADE A MISTAKE. I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS A PRIVACY [00:15:17] ISSUE. I THINK THE OTHER COMPLICATED THING TO THE REAR OR EAST OF THE PROPERTY IS A SEPARATE DRAINAGE WHERE THERE IS STANDING WATER ALL THE WAY TO THE PONDS BACK THERE. THE ISSUE WITH MY NEIGHBORS TO THE NORTH IS DISINTEGRATING PIPES. IT'S COMPLICATED TO GET BACK THERE. I THOUGHT THE SIMPLE SOLUTION WAS KEEP IT BOXED IN BUT I'M OPEN TO WHAT YOU THINK IS BEST. >> IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLAINT CAME ABOUT -- >> THAT IS CORRECT. I THINK IT WAS THE SAME PROPERTY OWNER. THEY COMPLAINED ABOUT THE FENCE IN THE AREA. NOT A THICK OVERGROWTH. YES. I THINK THE PERSON DOING CODE ENFORCEMENT WALKED ALL THE WAY UP AS WELL. OTHERWISE NO ONE HAS EVER COMPLAINED. >> THIS IS A DIFFICULT ONE. I UNDERSTAND HE CAN'T LEGALLY GO BACK ON SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY. ON THE COUNTY THERE IS NO OUTSIDE THAT WOULD ALLOW THAT FROM THE OVERVIEW PICTURES , THE NEIGHBOR CHOSE TO PLANT , SO THE NEIGHBOR HAS WALLED OFF. THEY'VE ABANDONED IT. FROM A NATURAL PERSPECTIVE THAT IS AFFECTING THIS. CERTAINLY THIS IS A TRICKY ISSUE AND APPROVING THIS I'M HAVING TROUBLE SEEING WHAT CAN ALLOW US AN EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCE HERE. >> I FEEL IT IS EXCEPTIONAL THAT YOU DON'T HAVE AN EASEMENT YOU CAN MAINTAIN AND YOU HAVE TO DEAL WITH THAT MUCH OVERGROWTH. YOU ALSO HAVE TO DEAL WITH SNAKES. IT'S TWO FEET. THE COMPLAINTS WE'VE GOTTEN AGAINST IT ARE CONCERNED DOING THIS WOULD OPEN THE FLOODGATES BUT THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS. THIS DECISION IS ON HIM. I WOULD APPROVE IT. >> I AM KIND OF TORN. I KNOW WE HAVE APPROVED SOMETHING IN A SIMILAR SITUATION AND SINCE THEN WE HAD A COUPLE MEETINGS CONSIDERING ALLOWING ANYTHING HIGHER . I AGREE IF YOU CAN'T MAINTAIN THE OTHER SIDE WHAT DO YOU DO? NECK NOW WE ARE IN A SITUATION WHERE IT'S COME TO SOMEBODY'S ATTENTION AND YET YOU'VE GOT GROWTH OUTBACK AND YOU HAVE KIDS LOOKING AT THE PLACE THAT'S THERE. I DON'T HAVE A [00:20:01] PROBLEM WITH IT. THE NEIGHBORS ARE COMPLAINING. THAT'S MY ONLY THING. >> I THINK PART OF THE REASON NOBODY HAS EVER SEEN THIS IS IT IS NATURAL. I THINK I CAN GET BEHIND THE VARIANCE THAT WOUD REQUIRE THE FENCE WHEN THIS COMES BACK UP. >> OR IT CAN BE REPLACED WITH A SIX FOOT FENCE. >> YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION? >> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE 2023-16 MILES RESIDENCE PROVIDED THE STAFF REPORT. ONCE IF THE FENCE IS REPLACED GETS REPLACED WITH A SIX FOOT FENCE. >> I SECOND THAT. >> HEARING A MOTION THE SECOND. [2. San Juan Drive Parking Ordinance. Public Hearing – Proposed amendment to the Ponte Veda Zoning District Regulations (PVZDR) Ordinance NO. 2003-05, as amended; Amending Section IX.D,” off-street parking- General provisions” to modify San Juan Drive Parking Requirements and limitations.] >> MOTION CARRIES. >> AS A POINT OF CLARIFICATION WAS THE COLOR PART OF THE MOTION? >> NO. >> WE HAVE THE SECOND ITEM ON OUR AGENDA. THE SAN JUAN DRIVE PARKING ORDINANCE. WE WILL START . >> NO COMMUNICATION. >> NO COMMUNICATION. >> NO COMMUNICATION. >> NO COMMUNICATION. >> THANK YOU. BRAD WESTER REPRESENTING . THIS IS THE SECOND TIME WE ARE HERE. WE TABLED AT THE FIRST TIME SO WE COULD GO BACK AND COME UP WITH COMPROMISES. WE HAVE PUT THOSE WITH THE LATEST DRAFT FOR YOU TODAY. THIS IS DEALING WITH SAN JUAN DRIVE. IT'S ROUGHLY TWO MILES . ROUGHLY AN AVERAGE BUT IT DOES HAVE REGULAR PAYMENT THROUGHOUT. UNLIKE MANY OTHER LOCAL ROADS THE SPEED LIMIT IS 25 MILES PER HOUR . THIS IS A MAP SHOWING THIS DRIVE FROM NORTH TO THE SOUTH . CONDITIONS AND TRAFFIC SPEEDING AROUND PARKING VEHICLES AND PRECEDING AROUND BLIND CURVES AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC. INCREASINGLY PROVIDES CUT THROUGH TRAFFIC . PEDESTRIANS, BICYCLES ALL SHARE THE SAME ROAD. THIS IS A REQUEST FOR NO PARKING. SIMILAR TO THE NEW ORDINANCE WOULD HELP THESE CONCERNS AND DESCRIBED AT THE PREVIOUS HEARING HAS SHOWN GREAT PROGRESS. THE CURRENT EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RULE ARE EMERGENCY LAW ENFORCEMENT, PUBLIC SERVICE , CARPET UTILITY , TREE CLEANUP SERVICE , SCHOOL BUSES BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE. THEY DO DROP OFF IN THE AREA. IF THEY NEED TO TRAVERSE THE ROAD OR DROP OFF, AND THEN NONROUTINE DELIVERIES LIKE [00:25:01] MOVING TRUCKS OR NEW MOVE IN OR MAYBE A REFRIGERATOR BEING REPAIRED OR DELIVERED. RESIDENT PARKING ON STREETS ALLOWED ON WEEKDAYS . THAT IS THE COMPROMISE. WILL WE HAVE DONE IS INCLUDED THAT NEW PARK IN ORDINANCE . THE EXCEPTION IS AFTER 5:00 P.M. RESIDENCE CAN PARK UNTIL THE NEXT MORNING AND THEN THAT IS MAINLY DURING THE WEEKDAYS. WEEKENDS ARE OPEN. IT IS CUSTOMARILY SITUATED NOW TO HELP ALLEVIATE. THAT IS RELATED TO RESIDENT PARKING. NOT CONTRACTORS . THERE HAS BEEN SOME DISCUSSION ON SIGNAGE . IT IS CLEARLY MARKED AND ADVERTISED. THERE WILL BE A LOCATION THAT SHOWS IF NEEDED. IT HAS WORKED OUT. THERE WAS SOME PREVIOUS SIGNAGE THAT WAS PUT OUT THERE. IT WAS VERY CONFUSING . THIS ONE WAS CHANGED ONCE WE OF HATED IT A COUPLE YEARS AGO. HERE IS THE EXCEPTION LIST AND A LINK TO THAT. THIS IS THE REDLINE WE HAVE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY. IT DOES REITERATE THAT RESIDENCE CAN CONSISTENTLY PARK ON THE BOULEVARD ON THE WEEKENDS AND AFTER 5:00 P.M. HERE IS THE CLEAN VERSION OF THAT ORDINANCE DRAFT THAT WE HAVE GIVEN. THIS IS THE CLEANUP VERSION . IT BASICALLY SAYS PARKING OF NONCOMMERCIAL VEHICLES . THAT IS OVERNIGHT. AT ANY TIME ON WEEKENDS THERE ARE NO PART IN ANY TIME SIGNAGE ON THOSE SPECIFIC. THAT IS PRETTY MUCH IT. I HAVE WORKED THROUGH SOME TO COME UP WITH THIS DRAFT. WE WILL TALK ABOUT THIS. THERE IS ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING I BELIEVE. WE DO HAVE ONE MORE TO GO. I AM OPEN TO ANSWERING QUESTIONS. I KNOW THERE'S SOME FOLKS HERE FROM THE PUBLIC TO SPEAK AS WELL. >> THANKS FOR BEING HERE. FROM THE LAST TIME WE SPOKE IN JULY UNTIL NOW HOW MUCH FEEDBACK DID WE GET FROM THE RESIDENCE VERSUS THE ORIGINAL POSTING? >> AFTER THE PREVIOUS MEETING ON SOME OF OUR TRUSTEES AND WE WORK WITH OUR ATTORNEY ON THAT. I THINK WHAT CAME OUT OF THE PREVIOUS HEARING WAS TO ALLOW THE RESIDENCE TO PARK ON SAN JUAN DRIVE. THERE WAS CONCERNS ABOUT SOME OF THE VEHICLES IN THE INDUSTRY NOT BEING ABLE TO PARK THERE ANYMORE BUT WE FELT HAVING A TEMPLATE TO DRAW FROM AS FAR AS SUCCESSES , WE FELT NOT HAVING THE VEHICLES PARKED BUT HAVING RESIDENTS PARK THEIR IS A GOOD TEST MODEL. WE CAN ALWAYS COME BACK AND MODIFY THAT. IT DOES IMPROVE SAFETY CONCERNS. I'VE HAD A NUMBER OF EMAILS SINCE DESCRIBING THE SAME ISSUES. SOMETHING I DIDN'T SUBMIT PREVIOUSLY WAS EMAIL AS AN ELECTED OFFICIAL. ONE IS FROM OUR ST. JOHNS COUNTY OFFICE WHO WAS SERVING [00:30:01] AT A SPECIFIC TIME. HE ALSO MAKES A CLAIM ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF CONTRACTORS IN THE AREA. HE DESCRIBES IN HIS EMAIL IT CLEARLY HAS BEEN AN ISSUE . THAT IS THE CONVERSATION WE HAVE HAD. THOSE THAT REACHED OUT TO ME I RESPONDED. >> DO YOU THINK THE REPOSTING MADE A DIFFERENCE IN YOUR OPINION? >> I HOPE SO. I KEEP SAYING BOULEVARD. THE SIGNAGE OUT THERE WAS THREE ADVERTISED. WE OFFER THEM TO VOICE THEIR OPINIONS THEY MIGHT HAVE. >> I DID SPEAK WITH JOHN AND PREVIOUSLY MY NEIGHBORS ABOUT THIS. THE THREE BIG ISSUES I HAD . THANK YOU. >> YOU SAID NO BIKE LANES. >> YOU ARE SAYING CARS PARKED ON THE SIDE? >> WE HAD THE SAME DISCUSSION . THIS ROAD ESPECIALLY WITH THE CLUB IMPROVEMENTS GOING ON FOR RESIDENCE NOT WANTING TO GO ON TO THE BOULEVARD. WE DID HAVE SOME FROM TRAFFIC ENGINEERING EXPLAIN THAT PARKING VEHICLES ON THE ROADWAY IS NOT AN IMPROVEMENT. IT DOES THE OPPOSITE. THEY SPEED UP AROUND THE CARS WITH REALLY NO STANDARD . THERE IS A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME WHERE FOLKS TRY TO ZOOM AROUND THE . YOU HAVE FOLKS EITHER ON BICYCLES RUNNING OR WALKING APPROACHING THE SAME DIRECTION. BECAUSE THERE'S NO SIDEWALK OR DESIGNATED BIKE LANE EVERYBODY IS USING THE SAME. WE FELT THIS WAS THE BEST APPROACH. WE CAN ALWAYS MODIFY IT LATER. MAYBE AFTER SIDEWALKS ARE INSTALLED. WE FELT THIS WAS THE COMPROMISE AFTER HOURS. AND ALSO ON THE WEEKENDS. >> DURING THIS ENTIRE PROCESS WE'VE HAD THE COUNTY COME OUT -- LET ME BACK UP. DURING THE PROJECT THERE WAS A LOT OF WORK OUT THERE. THIS WAS RIGHT IN THE HEART OF OUR DISCUSSION WITH OTHER TRAFFIC ELEMENTS. THE COUNTY DID AGREE TO TRAFFIC COMMENTS . THEY CAME BACK AFTER THE WATERLINE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SPECIFICALLY BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT TO COUNT THE TRUCKS DRIVING ON THE ROAD. THEY SAID THERE WAS NO MERIT TO PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONING. THAT IS ONE OF THOSE. THE COUNTY CAME BACK AND SAID I THINK THAT WOULD STRONGLY OPPOSED TO HAVE SPEED BUMPS THROUGHOUT ALL OF SAN JUAN DRIVE. THERE ARE OTHER WAYS. YOU CAN SQUEEZE THE ROAD TIGHTER AND PUT DIFFERENT THINGS OUT THERE. THE COUNTY CAME BACK AND SAID IT WASN'T WARRANTED FOR THEM TO PROVIDE FUNDING FOR THESE MEASURES. THAT WAS ABOUT A YEAR AGO. >> I WILL OPEN THIS FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. [00:35:16] >> >> I'M HERE BECAUSE I WOULD LIKE TO ADVOCATE FOR INCREASING SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS WHO WALK ON SAN JUAN DRIVE. I TAKE MY DOGS OUT IN A STROLLER EVERY DAY. THREE OF THE ROADS I WALK ON , ALL THREE OF THESE ROADS DOUBLE YELLOW LINES THAT PROVIDE SAFETY FOR PEDESTRIANS. BECAUSE SAN JUAN HAS NEITHER A DOUBLE YELLOW LINE NOR SIDEWALKS IS MORE HAZARDOUS. THESE ARE THE REASONS WHY. WHEN CARS AND TRUCKS ARE PARKED IN THE ROADWAY THE STREET BECOMES A SINGLE LANE WITH OBSCURED SIGHTLINES. FOR EXAMPLE, IF A VEHICLE IS PARKED ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD IN A DOUBLE-BLIND SITUATION CREATED. AS I'M WALKING NORTHBOUND DRIVERS CANNOT SEE ME. TO GET AROUND THE VEHICLE THEY HAVE TO DRIVE SOUTH AND ONLY SEE ME WHEN THEY ARE ABOUT TO CUT BACK TO THE SOUTHBOUND SIDE. CYCLISTS ARE ALSO UNABLE TO SEE PEDESTRIANS IN THESE SITUATIONS. SIMILARLY, I CANNOT SEE EITHER CARS OR CYCLISTS. ANY NORTHBOUND DRIVERS ALSO HAVE TO PROCEED CAUTIOUSLY IF THERE IS A VEHICLE PARKED ON THEIR SIDE. SOME DAYS VEHICLES ARE PARKED ON BOTH SIDES CREATING THIS SITUATION. SAFETY WOULD BE GREATLY ENHANCED ON SAN JUAN DRIVE IF TWO THINGS HAPPENED. ONE, A SIDEWALK IS INSTALLED AND NO VEHICLE PARKING IS ALLOWED ON SAN JUAN. THE SIDEWALK OPTION HAS BEEN STALLED BY THE COUNTY BECAUSE SOME RESIDENTS DO NOT WANT THE SIDEWALK. THEY DO NOT REALIZE THE COUNTY OWNS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN THE ROAD AND THEIR PROPERTIES. SOME OWNER NURSE AND WANT TO RETAIN THEM AND OBJECT TO HAVING THE SIDEWALK. THE MSD HAS BEEN WORKING TIRELESSLY ON THIS PROBLEM FOR YEARS . IT IS TIME FOR A SOLUTION FOR ALL RESIDENTS TO WALK IN ALL OF THE NEIGHBORHOODS IN PONTEVEDRA. THE NO VEHICLE PARKING ORDINANCE COULD BE THE FIRST STEP IN HELPING TO ACHIEVE THAT GOAL. I HAVE A LITTLE DIAGRAM HERE . THIS IS BE WALKING ALONG PUSHING MY STROLLER AND TWO DOGS. THERE WILL BE CYCLISTS TO THE RIGHT , NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC. IF THERE IS A PART CAR I HAVE TO STOP, USUALLY THE CAR WILL GO BY FIRST THEN THE CYCLIST THEN I COME AROUND AND SOMETIMES THE SOUTHBOUND CAR COMES AROUND AFTER THE CYCLIST THINKING THAT IS THE LINE SO I HAVE TO JUMP BACK OVER . IT IS UNSAFE. IN QUEUE. >> THANK YOU. IF YOU WILL GIVE THAT DIAGRAM >> GOOD AFTERNOON. 100 WHETSTONE PLACE HERE. >> I'M SORRY CAN YOU GIVE ME ONE SECOND FOR A TECHNICAL ISSUE? I DON'T WANT TO TAKE YOUR TIME. [00:40:24] PONTE VEDRA >> WE APPRECIATE THEM BEING WITH US ON THIS REVISED LANGUAGE. WE DO SUPPORT IT. IT DOES NOT REQUIRE PEOPLE WHO WANT INTER PARTES OR SOCIAL GATHERINGS ON SAN JUAN TO ACTUALLY HIRE PEOPLE . IT PUTS THE LIMITATIONS ON AND NOT RESIDENT VEHICLES CAN PARK. I WANT TO POINT OUT IT DOES MAKE OTHER CLARIFICATION. THIS IS IN THE AGENDA PACKAGE THERE SO THAT IS WHERE WE FOUND IT . ALSO IT TAKES OUT JUST TO KNOW THE REQUIREMENT OF A BLACK PERSON SO THAT IS ANOTHER BENEFIT TO THE RESIDENCE AS WAS POINTED OUT. WE DO AGREE WITH THIS PROPOSED LANGUAGE NOW. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR ATTENTION. THANK YOU. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. I NAME IS CLAUDIA THOMAS. I MET 342 SAN JUAN DRIVE. I STEPPED OUT MOMENTARILY TO TAKE A CALL WHO HAS ASKED ME TO ASSERT ON HIS BEHALF HE HAS NO DECISION AS IT PERTAINS TO HIS POSITION ON THE NO PARKING INITIATIVE ON OUR STREET. HE HAS NOT AUTHORIZED ANYBODY FROM HIS OFFICE TO MAKE OR ASSERT THEY ARE IN FAVOR OF THE NEW RESTRICTIONS AND WANTED TO ENSURE THAT WAS MADE CLEAR TODAY. AS IT PERTAINS TO THE COMPROMISE LANGUAGE WHILE I AM DELIGHTED TO SEE PARKING AFTER HOURS AND ON WEEKENDS I AM STILL AT THE POSTURE WHERE IF I HAVE MY LAWN COMPANY WITH OUR TRAILER AND VARIOUS OTHER THAT COME ON A ROUTINE BASIS TO MY HOME IT DOES PREVENT INGRESS AND EGRESS FROM MY DRIVEWAY. I HAVE THE ISSUE IF WE ARE A NARROW STREET. WE WERE SEEING AND GETTING IN AND OUT OF OUR DRIVEWAY IT WILL PRESENT A HARDSHIP IN THE EVENT IT IS JUST NOT FEASIBLE BECAUSE WE DO NOT HAVE A SEMI CIRCLE OR SECULAR DRIVEWAY SO I DO ASK YOU TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION. ALL NEIGHBORS WERE GRANDFATHERED WITH THOSE PROVISIONS. BEYOND THAT I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT THE ISSUE AS IT PERTAINS TO PARKING ALONG THE GOLF COURSE. THE COMPROMISE FROM MY STANDPOINT AND A LOT IN AGREEMENT WOULD BE THE GOLF COURSE AREA ALONG MIRANDA TO DETER PARKING WITH NO PARKING AND CURVED AREAS WHERE THERE IS PERHAPS FREEWAY INTERSECTIONS AND TRAFFIC . I ALSO WANTED TO ADD SIX ADDITIONAL NAMES TO READ INTO THE RECORD. I READ SEVERAL INTO THE RECORD AND I DO HAVE SIX ADDITIONAL SIGNED IN OPPOSITION TO THE NO PARKING INITIATIVE. THAT WOULD BE ELIZABETH SCOTT AT 345 SAN JUAN DRIVE, 354 SAN JUAN DRIVE , GREEN FAIR AT 222 SAN JUAN DRIVE, 322 SAN JUAN DRIVE, 336 SAN JUAN DRIVE AND 336 SAN JUAN DRIVE. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AND TIME. THANK YOU. >> HI. 339 SAN JUAN DRIVE. I KNOW THAT WOMAN FROM WALKING AND RUNNING. SPEEDING AROUND PARKED VEHICLES. MY FEELING IS [00:45:05] WHEN I SEE A PARKED VEHICLE EVERYBODY STOPS. I'VE NEVER EXPERIENCED ROAD RAGE WHICH IS WHAT IS BEING DEPICTED . NEVER. EVER. WHAT I SEE IS WHEN THERE IS NO PARKING IT IS A SPEEDWAY. THE ONLY TIME IT ISN'T IS WHEN THEY ARE PUTTING IN CABLE LINES AND THE ROAD IS BEING REPAVED. THE ADDRESSING OF THE NO PARKING FROM 7 TO 5 . THAT DOESN'T HELP US. I THINK A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE NOT REALLY WELL-VERSED IN THE FACT THAT YOU TECHNIK WE CANNOT PARK IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY ON YOUR LAWN. I SPOKE WITH ONE OF MY NEIGHBORS BUT THEY TECHNICALLY CAN'T. ARE YOU GOING TO ASK THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TO ENFORCE SOME LAWS AND NOT BOTH? DO I CALL UP AND SAY SO-AND-SO IS HAVING THEIR PEOPLE PARK ON THEIR LAWN BUT I CAN'T HAVE MY LAWN PEOPLE PARK IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE? THAT'S WHAT THIS STARTS TO CREATE. I ALSO AGREE WITH CLAUDIA AS FAR AS WHEN PEOPLE ARE BACKING OUT THERE ARE A LOT OF HOMES THAT HAVE DRIVEWAYS THAT ARE OPPOSITE EACH OTHER. IF YOU HAVE A BIG LAWN CARE TRUCK WITH ITS TRACTOR OR TRAILER BEHIND IT AND THEY ARE TRYING TO NAVIGATE OUT THEY HAVE A MAILBOX BEHIND THEM AND OTHER PEOPLE. YOU WILL HAVE A SEPARATE SECURITY OR SAFETY ISSUE. I AM ON THOSE STREETS ALL THE TIME. I SEE ALL THE PEOPLE WALKING AND CYCLISTS AND EVERYTHING. FOURTH OF JULY WAS ONLY TIME I SAW PARKING FOR THE BEACH AND THAT WAS RIGHT BY MIRANDA IN FRONT OF THE GOLF COURSE. I'VE NEVER BEEN IMPACTED BY IT AND I'VE LIVED IN CALIFORNIA WHERE I WAS TELLING TONY PRACTICALLY ALMOST EVERY SATURDAY AND SUNDAY OF THE SUMMER I WOULD BE FIGHTING FOR A SPOT IN FRONT OF MY LAWN TO PARK. THAT'S WHAT I BARGAINED FOR WHEN I BOUGHT THERE. TO ME, WHEN I BOUGHT MY HOUSE A YEAR AGO I DIDN'T WANT TO HAVE TO HAVE RESTRICTIONS ON WHERE I COULD PARK , DO WHAT I COULD DO AND I'VE LIVED IN HOAS. PEOPLE THAT HAVE BOUGHT DON'T WANT TO LIVE IN AN AGE AWAY. THEY HAVE THOSE RESTRICTIONS. I THINK IF WE START IMPOSING RESTRICTIONS NOW IT OPENS THE FLOODGATES FOR THE SIDEWALKS . I AM ADAMANTLY OPPOSED TO IT. BE RESPONSIBLE WHEN YOU ARE WALKING OR RUNNING. DON'T HAVE YOUR HEADPHONES IN. WALK AND BE RESPONSIBLE. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY FURTHER PUBLIC COMMENT? >> GOOD AFTERNOON. I AM NOT A RESIDENT OF SAN JUAN. I AM AN AVID CYCLIST. SAN JUAN IS MY MAIN ROAD THAT I USE. I AM ALSO ON THE MST BOARD. SAN JUAN DRIVE HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN OUR COMMUNITY. WE HAVE HAD MANY PEOPLE COME AND ASK FOR RELIEF AND SUGGESTION ON THE ROADWAY. AT TIMES YOU CAN'T EVEN GET THROUGH. I AM HERE TO SUPPORT THE COMPROMISE TO LET YOU KNOW THAT IF I NEED IT I CAN PROBABLY BRING 20 OR 30 NAMES ARE 40 NAMES OF PEOPLE WHO CONTACTED ME PERSONALLY AND ASKED IF THEY SUPPORT THE ORDINANCE IN FRONT OF THEM. THERE ARE PARTS THAT ARE ONLY 18 FEET WIDE. THERE'S ONLY A FEW PLACES BUT WE ALSO HAVE THOSE AT LEAST ONE OF THE ELECTRONIC SPEED LIMITS THAT CLOCKS IT. WE PAY FOR EXTRA POLICE. WHEN WE SEE A PROBLEM WE WILL SEND THEM TO SAN JUAN [00:50:03] DRIVE. WE WILL TARGET THAT ROAD. WE ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE THE ROADS SAFER. THE COMPROMISE SHOWS THAT. WE ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE THAT READ SAFER FOR PEDESTRIANS. >> THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY FURTHER PUBLIC COMMENT? >> 327 SAN JUAN DRIVE. I HAVE BEEN THERE 28 YEARS. I'VE SEEN THE INCREASE IN THAT 20 YEAR PERIOD. THE FIRST WAY FOR ANYONE COMING SOUTH WAS TAKING A LEFT AT SAN JUAN TO HEAD TO THE TENNIS COURTS OR THE CLUB OR WHAT HAVE YOU. I AGREE WITH THE FIRST RESIDENT THAT SPOKE ABOUT WALKERS, BIKERS. I'VE SEEN DANGEROUS SITUATIONS THERE. I'VE SEEN MANY CARS PILED BEHIND LAWN MAINTENANCE OR CONTRACTORS . THERE IS A LOT OF BUILDING GOING ON THERE. THAT IS GOING TO OCCUR FOR 2 TO 3 YEARS . THAT WILL ADD AN AMPLIFIED 20% , 30% . I TOTALLY AGREE . WE NEED MORE SAFETY ON SAN JUAN DRIVE. IT IS THE NARROWEST STREET OF ALL THE OLD PONTE VEDRA STREETS . IT'S BEEN MEASURED TO A T WHEN WE WERE DISCUSSING LAST YEAR THE SIDEWALK ISSUES. I'M REALLY PLEASED TO HEAR COMPROMISE . TRUSTEE BRAD WESTER IS LISTENING. IT'S A WONDERFUL THING. THERE ARE SPACIOUS DRIVEWAYS ALL THE WAY. SOME AREN'T ROUNDABOUT, SOME ARE. THERE IS PLENTY OF PARKING SPACE FOR A LAWN SERVICE OR CONTRACTOR TO GET OFF THE STREET . IT'S NOT THE PROPER WAY FOR THE CODE BROUGHT UP. THE PRECEDENT OF PONTE VEDRA BOULEVARD AND THAT IS THE OTHER INTEREST . THERE IS NO HARM I'VE HEARD THAT WOULD GREATLY IMPACT SOMEONE'S LIVING. I AGREE WITH THE LAST SPEAKER OR THE ONE RIGHT BEFORE , I DIDN'T WANT TO LIVE IN AN AGE AWAY BUT IT IS OVERDUE. THERE HAS BEEN PROBLEMS OF GETTING MORE SAFETY WITH I HAVE TO SAY THE INCREASED POPULATION. THANK YOU. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH. >> GOOD AFTERNOON. BOTH MY WIFE AND I ARE IN COMPLETE SUPPORT . NO RESTRICTIONS IN PARKING. WE EXPERIENCE EVERY DAY. WHEN MULTIPLE CARS ARE PARKED IN UNISON OR OPPOSITE PARTS OF THE ROAD THEY HAVE TO DETERMINE WHEN IT IS SAFE. I CAN TELL YOU DON'T TAKE ON ANYONE LATE FOR A TENNIS MATCH. I HAVE WITNESSED A STANDOFF AT THE END OF MY DRIVEWAY FOR BOTH CARS WERE HEADING IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS AND FELT THEY HAD THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. I HAD TO EXPLAIN ONE CAR COULD NOT BACKUP AND SINCE THEY HAD THAT OPTION WHEN CARS PARKED IN THE CURVE THERE ARE SEVERAL STRETCHES . THERE ONLY NEEDS TO BE ONE CAR TO CREATE THAT SITUATION FROM LACK OF VISIBILITY . I'VE WITNESSED 28 CONSTRUCTION CARS PARKED ON SAN JUAN DRIVE FOR AN ENTIRE DAY DURING CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW [00:55:02] HOME. WE HAVE TO BACK INTO THE ROADWAY WHEN A TRUCK HAS TURNED THE ROAD INTO A ONE-WAY ROAD AT THE POINT OF MY DRIVEWAY MAKING IT MORE DANGEROUS. I ALSO HAVE WITNESSED THE TRUCKS STOPPING TO PICK UP A LARGE AMOUNT OF PALM FRONDS AND ADJACENT TO THE TRUCK WAS A PARKED CAR BLOCKING TRAFFIC IN BOTH WAYS FOR AT LEAST FIVE MINUTES BECAUSE THERE WAS ONLY ONE MAN OPERATING THAT VEHICLE. THE TRUCK HAD NO CHOICE. THIS HAS BEEN AN ISSUE FOR YEARS UPON YEARS AND WE ARE HAPPY THEY ARE TAKING UP THIS TOPIC. WE HOPE IT ULTIMATELY PASSES THE VOTE BUT YOUR VOTE WILL OBVIOUSLY BE VERY HELPFUL. THANK YOU. >> I DON'T BELIEVE WE HAVE ANY MORE SPEAKERS. ANY MORE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT? >> THANK YOU. I FIND MYSELF A SERVANT OF THE BOARD IN MY SECOND TERM. NOT ONLY DUTIFULLY SERVING ON THAT BOARD BUT THE TESTIMONY I LIVED ON SAN JUAN DRIVE. I HAVE A CONDO. I'VE SEEN THE EFFECTS OF BOTH. I'VE SEEN THE ORDINANCE IN PLAY AND HOW IT HAS WORKED. I ALSO STATED UNDER OATH AND TESTIMONY IT IS NOT ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL. PERHAPS A COMPROMISE IS NEEDED. SOMETHING COULD BE USED WITH DIFFERENT LANGUAGE. AS A FORMER RESIDENT I'M HERE TO SAY I THINK THIS WILL WORK AS WELL. BY NO MEANS DID I EVER MENTION ANY ROAD RAGE TYPE INCIDENT. I WANT TO SAY BECAUSE WE DO PAY OUR OFF-DUTY SHERIFF'S OFFICERS TO CONTROL OUR STREETS. THEY HAVE A DUTY TO PROVIDE US AS EITHER WE REQUESTED OR FOLLOWING UP ON THEIR TIME OF SERVICE AND DUTY. WHAT I READ WAS AN EMAIL. IT DOESN'T TALK ABOUT WHAT SIDE OF THE FENCE YOU'RE ON. THIS IS FROM A CORPORAL IN THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE TALKING ABOUT FACTS ON THE ROADWAY WITH CONGESTION IN RESIDENCE. NUMEROUS RESIDENTS TALKED ABOUT THE ISSUE. LET'S PROVIDE THAT ON THE RECORD I HAVE EMAILS THAT ARE ALSO IN OUR SYSTEM THAT I WILL PROVIDE ON THE RECORD AS WELL. I AM HERE TO PROVIDE FAX AND STATE THESE AS I KNOW THEM . I ASK FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION AS COMPROMISE AND I'M HERE TO ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS. >> THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS ON THE BOARD? >> DID YOU EVER DO A DISCUSSION ABOUT MIRANDA OF INCLUDING THOSE INTO THIS? >> YES. A LOT OF ROADS HAVE COME UP THROUGHOUT DISCUSSIONS. THE GENESIS OF ALL THIS WAS THE SIDEWALK PROJECT. A SIDEWALK WAS NEEDED ON SAN JUAN DRIVE. SOME OF THAT DISCUSSION CAME ABOUT AS A PARKING ORDINANCE . WE OBLIGED . MIRANDA, PABLO AND SOME OF THE ROADS HAVE COME UP. FROM A STARTING POINT WE THOUGHT SAN JUAN SERVED A PURPOE BECAUSE IT WASN'T AS LONG AS MAY BE SOME OTHER ROADWAYS. IT WAS MORE PRIMARY. SOME BOATS TALKED ABOUT IT THOSE ARE MUCH DIFFERENT WIDER WITH ACTUAL CURBS IN A LOT OF AREAS. THEY HAVE A DIFFERENT CHARACTER OF ROADWAY. FOR THIS WE FELT LIKE ITGOOD ALBEIT SMALL STEP TO DO THE TWO MILES OF SAN JUAN DRIVE. I SAID ONE SIZE DOESN'T FIT ALL. IF WE FEEL LIKE MAYBE [01:00:03] SOMETHING ELSE NEEDS TO BE FIT OR WHATEVER IT MIGHT BE OR PULLING THEM BACK POTENTIALLY IF WE GET SOME SIDEWALK BUILT OUT THERE. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH A LOT OF ITERATIONS. WIDENING THE ROAD . FEEDBACK SIGNALING. ALL OF THAT HAS BEEN DONE THROUGH THE CIRCULATION IN PUBLIC SAFETY. AS I ALSO MENTIONED FOR 100+ YEARS WE HAVE BEEN BEHIND THE CURVE. STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS, SIDEWALKS. WE ARE BEHIND THE CURVE ON THE OLD LOTS THAT WERE THE GENESIS OF PUTTING GOOD SAFE CONSTRUCTION OUT THERE. I ASK FOR YOUR APPROVAL. >> THANK YOU. IN THE LAST TWO MONTHS HAS THERE BEEN ANY FURTHER MOVEMENT OF THE SIDEWALK RUSTY MARK >> YES. WE HAVE A MEETING TONIGHT TO DISCUSS THAT. WE HAVE BROKEN THAT SIDEWALK INTO DIFFERENT SEGMENTS . I AM PROUD TO STATE THAT WE HAVE INCREASED OUR SIDEWALK FROM A MERE FIVE TO $10,000 TO HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS NOW. WE FEEL IT IS DUE TO PROVIDE SOME OF WHAT WE PAY AS RESIDENCE AND PAY FOR SOME CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE WE TALKED ABOUT. TONIGHT WE WILL TALK ABOUT ONE OF THOSE TO TRY TO PUT THAT INTO MOTION NOT ONLY DONATING MONEY BUT TO ACTUALLY START THE SURVEY AND CONTRACTING PROCESS. >> THANK YOU. >> I'M GOING TO OPEN FOR DISCUSSION . >> I WAS VERY PLEASED THEY HAD INCORPORATED MY CONCERNS AND INAUDIBLE ] >> I AGREE. I AGREE WITH MANY PUBLIC SPEAKERS TODAY. I ALMOST GOT HIT ONE TIME. I JUST DON'T GO THERE ANYMORE. I WISH THE SIDEWALK WENT ALL THE WAY NORTH BUT IT DOESN'T. THAT IS A WHOLE ANOTHER CONVERSATION. I THINK THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC HAS WORKED OUT JUST FINE. >> I THINK IT IS A LOT OF HEADACHES AND DISCUSSION. >> I AGREE SAFETY IS IMPORTANT. THERE HASN'T BEEN AN ACCIDENT YET BUT ALL IT TAKES IS ONE CHILD BEING HIT AND YOU WILL SEE IT FROM A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AS TO HOW INCONVENIENT IT IS. >> I WILL ECHO EVERYONE ELSE'S COMMENTS. I AM IN FAVOR OF A SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE. I UNDERSTAND THAT DEBATE. IF SIDEWALK IS WHERE IT IS HEADED THEN PARKING AND RIGHT-OF-WAY IS GOING TO GO AWAY BECAUSE THERE WILL BE A SIDEWALK THERE. I CERTAINLY FEEL LIKE THIS IS A STEP IN THE DIRECTION OF SAFETY TOWARDS A BETTER DRIVE. CAN [01:05:04] SOMEONE MAKE A MOTION? >> I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE SAN JUAN DRIVE PARKING ORDINANCE WITH THE ONLY CHANGES TO THE REDLINE ON THE AMENDED PACKET IN OUR PLAN. >> THIS ISN'T A MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. >> I WILL REVISE MY MOTION. I WILL MAKE A MOTION AS A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AS AMENDED IN THE REDLINE VERSION. DO I HAVE A SECOND? [3. Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners the reappointment of Mr. Samuel Crozier to the Ponte Vedra Zoning and Adjustment Board. Mr. Samuel Crozier has requested to be reappointed to the Ponte Vedra Zoning and Adjustment Board (PVZAB). Mr. Crozier's term expires September 1, 2024. Mr. Crozier is eligible to serve an additional four year term. The PVZAB members serve at the pleasure of the Board of County Commissioners as the local planning agency for the Ponte Vedra Zoning District and fulfill any other duties and responsibilities as provided in Section XII.B., Ponte Vedra Zoning District Regulations.] >> SECOND. >> WITH FOUR VOTES THE MOTION CARRIES. NOW WE WILL MOVE ON TO STAFF ITEM NUMBER THREE , RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR THE REAPPOINTMENT OF SAMUEL CROZIER TO THE PONTE VEDRA ZONING AND ADJUSTMENT BOARD. >> ARE WE SUPPOSED TO DISCUSS THIS? >> ARE WE SUPPOSED TO ASK? >> YOU HAVE MY VOTE. I WOULD LIKE TO SAY YOU DO A GREAT JOB FOR THIS BOARD AND IT'S BEEN A PLEASURE WORKING WITH YOU DURING THE RECENT CHANGES. WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO FILL THE SEATS OF THE BOARD FOR SURE. I THINK YOUR LEADERSHIP WOULD MAKE A POSITIVE STEP IN THAT DIRECTION. I MAKE A MOTION TO REAPPOINT YOU AS CHAIRMAN OF [Minutes for Board Approval: 07/08/24 ] OUR BOARD. >> SECOND. >> DO I VOTE FOR MYSELF? ABSTAIN? >> I VOTED FOR MYSELF. >> THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION AND WILL GO TO THE BOARD. >> DO I HAVE A VOTE? >> MOTION CARRIES. MR. CHAIRMAN I RECEIVED A COPY OF MINUTES FROM THE PREVIOUS MEETING SO I WILL BRING THEM BACK UP. >> THANK YOU. THAT WAS NEXT ON MY LIST. APPROVING MINUTES FOR BOARD APPROVAL FROM THE 7/8/24. DOES ANYONE HAVE COMMENTS? [Staff Report] HEARING NONE I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FOR THE MEETING FROM 7/8/24. >> SECOND. >> MOTION CARRIES. DO WE HAVE ANYTHING FROM STAFF? >> THE ONLY THING I WOULD LIKE TO MENTION IS WE DO HAVE CURRENTLY ONE ZONING VARIANCE THAT WILL PROBABLY BE READY. HOPEFULLY WE WILL SEE WHERE I'M AT. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.