Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[Call meeting to order]

[00:01:16]

ANY MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC DESIRING TO SPEAK MUST INDICATE WITH THE SPEAKER CARD AVAILABLE IN THE FOUR-YEAR TREAT ANY ADDITIONAL SPEAKERS MAY BE HEARD ONLY AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CHAIRMAN, SPEAKER CARDS MAY BE TURNED INTO STAFF, THE PUBLIC SHALL SPEAK DURING A MEETING ON EACH ITEM ADDED LENGTH OF TIME DESIGNATED BY THE CHAIRMAN WHICH IS THREE MINUTES.

SPEAKER SHELLEY AND TRICIA IDENTIFY, WHO THEY REPRESENT STATE THE ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, SPEAKERS MAY OFFER SWORN TESTIMONY. IF THEY DO NOT THE TESTIMONY IS NOT SWORN MAY BE CONSIDERED BY THE AGENCY IN DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OR TRUTHFULNESS OF THE TESTIMONY.

IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THE HEARING, SUCH PERSON WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND MAY NEED TO ENSURE VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE IN THE RECORD INCLUDES EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE MADE.

ANY PHYSICAL OR DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE PRESENTED DURING THE HEARING SUCH AS DIAGRAMS, CHARTS, WRITTEN STATEMENTS WILL BE RETAINED BY STAFF AS THE RECORD FOR THE RECORD WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR OTHER AGENCY OR THE COUNTY IN ANY REVEAL OF

[Approval of meeting minutes for PZA 11/17/2022, 9/1/2022 and 4/20/2023]

APPEAL RELATING TO THE ITEM. BOARD MEMBERS ARE REMINDED AT THE BEGINNING OF EACH ITEM THEY SHOULD STATE WHETHER THEY HAD IN A MEDICATION WITH APPLICANT OR ANY OTHER PERSON REGARDING THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ITEM OUTSIDE OF THE FORM OF HEARING OF AGENCY AND IF SUCH COMMITTED KITCHEN HAS OCCURRED THEY SHOULD IDENTIFY THE PERSON INVOLVED IN THE MATERIAL CONTEXT OF THE COMMUNICATION. WE WILL BE RESPECTFUL OF ONE ANOTHER EVEN WHEN WE DISAGREE, AND DIRECT ALL COMMENTS TO THE ISSUES AND AVOID PERSONAL ATTACKS.

>> OKAY. >> AGENCY MEMBERS YOU HAVE IN FRONT OF YOU THE MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 17, 2022, SEPTEMBER 1, 2022 IN APRIL 20TH, 2023. SO ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THOSE MINUTES. A MOTION BY MEGAN A SECOND BY ELVIS, ANY DISCUSSION? ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE.

>> AYE. >> ALRIGHT, THAT PASSES.

IT DOESN'T APPEAR THIS IS THE CASE BUT JUST IN CASE REZONIG 2022/25 SAN SEBASTIAN WAS ORIGINALLY ADVERTISED WILL NOT BE HERE TODAY AND WE ADVERTISE TODAY AT SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE AS DETERMINED. IF ANYONE IS HERE FOR REZONING 2022-25. AT THIS TIME I WOULD LIKE TO

[1. ZVAR 2022-18 513 Canal Variance]

OPEN UP THE CUP UNTIL PUBLIC COMMENT THE GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT. YOU MAY COME UP AND SPEAK ON ANY ITEMS ON THE AGENDA WERE ANYTHING YOU WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO. WE WILL HAVE PUBLIC COMMENT.

EACH ITEM AS IT COMES UP. IS ANYONE HERE AT THIS TIME.

WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER NOTES? >> AT THIS POINT WE'RE GOING TO ROLL INTO ITEM NUMBER ONE AND HE WILL GIVE HIS PRESENTATION.

>> IS THERE ANY EXPERT COMMUNICATION.

>> I HAD A BRIEF CONVERSATION WHERE THIS WAS LOCATED.%

>> MEGAN? >> I HAVE ABSTAIN IS APPLICANT

IS MY EMPLOYER. >> ELVIS?

>> OUT A CONVERSATION WITH MR. HART.

>> ALRIGHT. >> I ALSO HAD A TELEPHONE CONVERSATION WITH MR. HART AND WE TALKED ABOUT THE PROJECT, HIS

MERITS AND OTHER THINGS. >> I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH MRE AND HE EXPLAINED TO ME WHY I SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS ITEM.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN CURTIS HART 8051.

[00:05:01]

THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A SERIES OF VARIANCES ON CANAL STREET. ARE YOU CONTROLLING WARM AM I?

>> THANK YOU. 513 CANAL STREET.

MR. CHAIRMAN IN REFERENCE TO THE COMMISSION CANAL STREET IS ACCESS BY THE ROAD EXTENSION AND THIS LOT IS THE NORTHERN MOST LOT AND ON THE LEFT YOU'LL SEE A RED OUT WHERE THE HOUSES BEING BUILT AND THIS IS AN APPLICATION FOR A DETACHED GARAGE IN THE OTHER SIDE OF THE CANAL IS A STREET THE CANAL STREET EVERY LOT ALONG THE LINE. WE ARE ASKING FOR A FEW VARIANCES ONE IS A REDUCTION IN THE FIRST FRONT YARD.

BECAUSE IT'S ON A CORNER WE HAVE BY DEFINITION TO FRONT YARDS.

THE FIRST ONE IS 25-FOOT TO 5-FOOT THAT IS THE WESTERN AND IN THE SECOND REQUEST IS 15 FEET TO 14 FEET, THAT IS THE NORTH END AND THE THIRD REDUCE THE SIDE YARD FROM A FOOT TO 5-FOOT IN THE FOURTH REQUEST IS TO INCREASE THE LOT COVERAGE FROM 37% TO ALLOW FOR A TWO CAR DETACHED GARAGE.

THIS IS A SITE PLAN TO TAKE THE LOCATIONS OF THE BUILDING ON A VERY SMALL LOT WE'VE ASKED FOR 37%.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT COME UP IN THE STAFF REPORT IS A FEAR OF A LOSS OF LINE OF SIGHT THAT PARTICULAR NORTH SIDE WE ASKED FOR A REDUCTION 15 TO 14 WHICH IS ONLY 1 FOOT BACK, CANAL ROAD IS JUST A CURVE IN A ROAD IS NOT A STOP SIGN WITH THE TERMINATION OF THE CURVE IN THE ROAD I DON'T THINK A VERY WOULD INTERFERE OF LINE OF SIGHT OF ANYBODY COMING TO THE CANAL, THEY WOULD JUST CONTINUE TO FLOW. IF THERE'S ANY QUESTIONS ON THE SITE PLAN FEEL FREE TO ASK. THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY IS ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT THINGS THERE'S BENIGN VARIANCES.

WE PUT THE DIFFERENT COLORS THERE IS NINE VARIANCES ON THE SAME STREET AND THEY'VE ALL BEEN APPROVED BY THE BODY.

OUR REQUEST FROM ALL THE OTHER NINE REQUESTS HAD 0 FRONT YARDS IN REAR YARD SETBACKS AND UP TO 60% LOT COVERAGE WHICH WERE ONLY ASKING FOR 37% LOT COVERAGE. ON JUSTIFICATION THE LOT IS VERY NARROW. THE SIZE OF THE PROPERTY IS SMALL. TO FRONT YARDS CREATES A REQUIREMENT FOR THE SETBACK ON THE NORTHERN SIDE [INAUDIBLE] WE KNOW VEGAS COUNTRY TO PUBLIC INTEREST SINCE WE'VE HAD A HABIT NINE DIFFERENT TIMES EVENTS DOES NOT AFFECT ANY ADJACENT NEIGHBORS IN THE PURPOSE OF THE CODE IS NOT BASED ON FINANCIAL THE FAULTY PROPERTY SPECIFIC [INAUDIBLE] IT WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH ALL THE OTHERS IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. >> ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE AGENCY MEMBERS? ANY SPEAKER CARDS?

DO WE HAVE A MOTION. >> BEFORE WE HAVE A MOTION COMMITTEE BUT ON A RECORD IS PERKINS HAS PROPERLY PULLED OUT A VICHY IS A CONFLICT ON THIS ITEM IT MIGHT CREATE A SPECIAL

PRIVATE GAIN OR LOSS. >> YES OR.

>> ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO ADD STAFF WILL NOT PARK CARS IN FRONT OF THE GARAGE IS WHATEVER IS THERE WILL BE PUT INSIDE IN

[00:10:03]

CASE THERE IS A LINE SITE PROBLEM.

>> HENRY. >> I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROV 2022-18513 CANAL VARIANCE BASED ON THESE CONDITIONS PROVIDED IN

[2. MAJMOD 2023-01 Deerpark Commerce Center]

OUR STAFF REPORT. >> MOTION FOR HENRY FOR APPROVAL SECOND, IS THERE ANY DISCUSSION? , HEARING UNLESS REGISTER THE VOTE. THAT MOTION PASSES 4 - 0.

WELL DONE. LET'S MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER TWO. MS. SMITH.

PRAY DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY EX PARTE.

>> YES I GOT A MESSAGE TO BE HERE TODAY FOR SUPPORT.

>> I HAD A CONVERSATION WITH HER COUPLE OF DAYS AGO.

>> DOCTOR HILLS AND BACK. >> I SPOKE WITH AVERY SMITH YESTERDAY AND HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THE PROJECT AND I TOLD HER I WAS GOING ASK YOUR THREE QUESTIONS.

>> MEGAN. >> I RECEIVED AN E-MAIL AND SHE LEFT A VOICEMAIL IF I HAD ANY QUESTIONS TO CALL HER BACK.

[INAUDIBLE] >> I HAD THE PLEASURE OF TALKING TO MS. SMITH ABOUT THE PROJECT AND THINGS THAT WE TACKLE AT THE SAME TIME. SOME THINGS IN THE WORLD ARE MORE INTERESTING THAN LAND OF ELEMENT.

ANYWAY FOR THE RECORD ELLEN AVERY SMITH ROGERS TOWER 100 WHETSTONE CRATE INTO PLACE. WITH ME IS JIM WHO I WILL LET KICKOFF IN JUST A MINUTE AND ALSO JENNY WHO IS OUR PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEER FROM BGE THE MOST WE RUN INTO ENGINEERING QUESTIONS. JIM YOU WANT ME TO TURN IT OVER.

>> I'M JIM MAGILL AND PRESIDENT AND WERE BASED OUT OF CHICAGO TOMORROW NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FIRM IN A REAL QUICK BACKGROUND.

WE'VE BEEN ON CALL WORKING WITH THEM IF YOU REMEMBER WE MOVE THE DIRECTION ON THE PARCEL AT 305 AND 207 WHICH WAS TURNED DOWN RIGHT BEFORE IAN CAME IN THAT WAS SEPTEMBER OR OCTOBER OF LAST YEAR MYSELF AND MY TEAM HAVE BEEN WORKING WITH KE SINCE APRI.

WHEN I WAS TURNED DOWN WE PRESENTED DIFFERENT OPTION BECAUSE THEY WERE TRYING TO FIND A HOME AND THEY NEEDED TO EXPAND THE CURRENT FACILITY IN REYNOSA SUFFICIENT TO WHAT THEY'RE DOING HANDLING ALL THE STORES IN CENTRAL FLORIDA AFTER NORTHERN FLORIDA UP INTO THE CAROLINAS. RIGHT NOW DOING A LOT OF DISTRIBUTION IN PUBLIC IS COMING DOWN FROM THE LIEN IN MIAMI BECAUSE IT'LL HAVE THE CAPACITY. WE SHOWED THEM THE OPTIONS SOMEWHERE IN THE COUNTY BUT THEY WANTED TO KEEP THE EMPLOYEES IS VERY IMPORTANT TO THEM. WE IMPORTANTLY HAVE THE SITE RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET WHICH WAS ALL IN LIGHT IN THE HEADER TO COUNTER PUD A YEAR AGO. I THANK YOU KNOW KE.

THEY HAVE BEEN IN THE COMMUNITY SINCE 2010.

I DO A LOT OF BUILD TO SUIT PROJECTS THAT I'VE BEEN REALLY IMPRESSED BY HOW MUCH THEY GET BACK TO THE COMMUNITY, MAYBE NOW THERE'S BEEN A LITTLE BIT OF CHANGE IN THE CORPORATE WORLD AND THEY CARE IN THE WAY THAT THEY TREAT THEIR EMPLOYEES IN THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES I'VE TOURED A BIT IN THE FACILITY FOR SO LONG. I WAS VERY DISAPPOINTED WHEN WE DID NOT GET THE ZONING DONE WITH THE ORIGINAL SITE BECAUSE I THOUGHT THEY WERE A GREAT COMPANY TO KEEP THE COMMUNITY AND I HOPE WE DO HAVE AN OPTION SO WE CAN KEEP THEM IN THE COMMUNITY. ANYWAY IT LOOKS LIKE WERE GETTING CLOSE TO THE END BUT WE HAVE SUPPORT FOR YOU GUYS TO

MAKE THIS HAPPEN. >> THANK YOU JIM, JUST TO GO THROUGH THE DETAILS WHICH ARE IN YOUR STAFF REPORT OBVIOUSLY AS JIM POINTED OUT AS AN EXISTING PUD AND IS EXISTING FOR PROBABLY 17 YEARS AND BEEN MODIFIED A COUPLE OF TIMES OVER THE YEARS.

TODAY WERE ASKING YOU TO INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSING SPACE BY 43000 SQUARE FEET IN ONE BUILDING BECAUSE THEY NEED ONE BUILDING A 545,000 SQUARE FEET

[00:15:03]

TO SERVE THE JURISDICTION THAT JIM JUST POINTED OUT FOR THE MODIFICATION INCREASES THE BUILDING HEIGHT FROM 49 TO 53 FEET. AGAIN THIS IS VERY SPECIFIC IN HIS PLANNING AND I'LL SHOW YOU THE LOCATION IN A MINUTE.

YOU'LL SEE IS UP AGAINST I-95 AND SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES SO IT SHOULD NOT AFFECT ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES OR BE INCOMPATIBLE. WERE ALSO ASKING UPDATES TO THE PHASING YOU SHOWING YOU THE LOCATION MAP YOU KNOW STATE ROAD 207 AND I-95 YOU HAVE THE WHOLE AREA OF DEER PARK INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSING SPACE ALL OF THIS IN ST. JOHN'S PARK HAS MORE COMMERCIAL WITH CAR DEALERSHIPS COMING, ALL OF THAT AND OF COURSE THE PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED OR BORDERED BY 207 AND I FIGHT. AND JUST AGAIN ZOOMING IN YOU SEE THE EXISTING INDUSTRIAL IN THE AREA AND THIS IS SAINT AUGUSTINE MARKETPLACE, THIS FLEAMARKET IS GONE BUT THE PROPERTY IS BAPTIST AND BROOKS, THE BEST BET IS OVER THERE AND NOW UNDER OPERATION, BEAVER, TOYOTA, HYUNDAI, MAZDA AND OTHER USERS IN THE CAR DEALERSHIP ARE GOING OVER THERE, THESE ARE COMPATIBLE USES WITH WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT TODAY.

THE EXISTING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION IS MIXED USE ZONING IS PUD ALREADY, BACK IN THE DAY THESE LANDS WERE ADDED IN THERE NOT BEEN ADDED TODAY SO I APOLOGIZE FOR THE MISTAKE ON THIS MATTER. WITH RESPECT TO THE SITE PLAN THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT IS BEING PROPOSED AGAIN IN ONE BUILDING, A MAXIMUM OF 540,000 SQUARE FEET WE RECEIVED ALL THE UPDATED TABLE AS FAR AS THE NUMBER OF ACRES AND WETLANDS IN THE NUMBER OF IMPACTED WETLANDS. ALL OF THE SITE DETAILS HE WILL SEE ON THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN THAT'S BEEN REVISED.

AGAIN THERE ARE PUBLIC BENEFITS FROM HAVING 45000 SQUARE FEET FOR THEM IN THEIR SPECIFIC FOOTPRINT THAT THEY NEED.

THERE ARE PRESERVATION OF NINE AND HALF ACRES OF WETLAND ON THE SITE AND THERE ARE PROVISIONS SIGNAL, I'LL CALL IN ANALYSIS OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT 207 AND DEER PARK BOULEVARD AND IF IT SHOWS THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTED IN DOC APPROVED THEIR MECHANISMS IN THE PUD FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION TO BE POSTED BEFORE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS ISSUED FOR THE BUILDING AND NOT FOR THE BOARD'S PURVIEW BUT YOU'LL HEAR WHEN IT GOES TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION A FINANCIAL INCENTIVE TO KEEP THEM IN THEIR JOBS AND SAME JOBS COUNTY AND TO PAY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE TRAFFIC WHICH IS GOING TO BE WARRANTED DUE TO SAFETY DUE TO PASSERSBY ON 207. AGAIN YOUR STAFF REPORT IS GOOD, I WENT TO NOTE IN THE STAFF REPORT FOR THE UTILITY DEPARTMENT WE HAVE AN AVAILABILITY LETTER FOR 545,000 SQUARE FEET, THAT IS A LITTLE DIFFERENT THAN YOUR STAFF REPORT SAYS TODAY BUT IT'LL BE UPDATED FOR THE COUNTY COMMISSION AND WE ALSO HAVE TWO LETTERS OF SUPPORT ONE IS FROM THE ROUNDTABLE AND ONE IS FROM A RESIDENT JOE MCINERNEY WHICH I THINK YOUR ALL FAMILIAR WITH WE APPRECIATE THE LETTERS OF SUPPORT IN YOUR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL FROM HITTING ANSWER WHATEVER QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE. āŒž> I NEED TO AMEND MY EXPERTS I.

WHEN I RECEIVED THE Q COUNTY STAFF I DID E-MAIL HER AND SHE RESPONDED. THE LAST TIME THIS WAS UP A YEAR OR SO AGO I BELIEVE I VOTED AGAINST I FAIL TO UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU HAD IN THERE AND WE HAD A DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT BUT THE THREE QUESTIONS I STATED I WAS GOING ASK YOU ARE NUMBER ONE DOES IT HAVE TO BE SO TALL WHAT IS THE REASON FOR INCREASING THE

HEIGHT EXTRA FEET. >> I ASKED LENA.

I'LL TRY NOT TO GET TOO TECHNICAL.

ON A BUILDING LIKE THIS WE HAVE THE ROOF AT THE HIGHEST PIPE UNDER .95 AND THAT'S FLOWING BECAUSE WERE TAKEN ALL THE WATER AND THAT MAYBE BRING UP THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN.

YOU CAN SEE WHERE OUR PONDS ARE RETAKING EVERYTHING, WE WILL CALL THAT WEST BUT THE REASON FOR THAT, BACK BEHIND THE

[00:20:05]

TYPICAL BUILDING WE SPLIT IT DOWN THE MIDDLE WATER GOES WHEN RAINWATER GOES THE OTHER WAY AND THEN WE BRING THE PIPING BACK TO ALL ALONG THE ALONG 95 SO WE CAN DO THAT WITHOUT GETTING BACK TO MODIFY SO THAT REQUIRED US TO DO IT, WHAT WERE DOING IS MORE EXPENSIVE WAY TO DO THE BUILDING BUT WE DON'T WANT TO GO BACK AND AFFECT THE WETLANDS, THAT'S A REASON.

I WOULD SAY AGAIN WERE ASKING FOR 53 FEET AND I THINK WE WILL BE UNDER THE HEIGHT THAT WE WANT TO MAKE SURE WE SUMITA THIS WE HAD NOT DONE A FULL ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN WE DIDN'T WANT TO COME BACK AND SAY WE MISSED IT WE NEED ANOTHER FOOT.

MY GUESS WE WILL BE 51 OR 52 FEET.

NOT MY GUESS. >> WHEN I ASKED HER THAT QUESTION SHE ALSO INDICATED THERE MIGHT BE ASPECT OF THE FOR

DURATION. >> IS REALLY NOT THE WHOLE BUILDING IS 36 CLEAR WHICH WE HAVE THE FIRST BAY WHICH IS ALL THE PRODUCT ON THE TRUCKS THAT DOES NOT NEED TO BE AS HIGH BUT EVERYTHING ELSE IS 36 CLEAR AND BACK TOWARDS 95 THE ROOF KEEPS GOING UP BECAUSE YOU'RE SLIPPING THE WATER PRETTY FREE DURING THAT 300 FEET IT BECOMES FAIRLY HIGH AT THE END IT'S MORE LIKE

EIGHT TO 10 FEET TALLER. >> TAKE YOU, GET INTO.

>> I VOTED AGAINST THIS BEFORE AND IT PASSED SO I'M NOT GOING TO VOTE AGAINST IT BECAUSE I THINK IT'S POINTLESS AND HAVE A STATEMENT ABOUT KEEPING THEM HERE IS THE WETLAND IMPACTS IS AT 9.63 ACRES BUT I THINK THERE'S 17 PLUS NEARLY 18 ACRES.

I WONDER IF YOU ALL HAD AN IDEA WHERE AND HOW THE WETLAND ACRES

ARE GOING TO BEGIN. >> PERCIVAL I WANT TO TELL YOU I APOLOGIZE IF I MISUNDERSTOOD THE FACT THAT THINGS HAD TO BE

STACKED UP IN THE BUILDING. >> THAT'S FINE.

>> THAT IS MY MISTAKE. >> IS NOT A BIG MISTAKE, NO NEED

TO APOLOGIZE. >> I WILL SAY FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE, YOU KNOW YOU BEEN IN ENVIRONMENTALISTS FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS YOU KNOW THE RULES OF FEDERAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT ALL CALLED ELIMINATION OF REDUCTION OF WETLAND IMPACTS. AS WE TALKED ABOUT THIS PROPERTY TO BUILD 545,000 SQUARE-FOOT BUILDING ON A PIECE OF PROPERTY REQUIRES THE WETLAND IMPACTS THERE IS NO WAY TO GET AROUND THE PARTICULARLY IN THIS LOCATION.

I THINK I WOULD POINT OUT THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY UP AND DOWN I-95 HAVE BEEN MIXED USE FOR A LONG TIME TO PROMOTE BUSINESSES LIKE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES TO DEVELOP NEW THOSE INTERSECTIONS BECAUSE THAT WAY GET VEHICLES ON AND OFF THE INTERSTATE AND THEY DON'T FILTER OUT INTO THE NEIGHBORHOODS. THAT'S WHY JIM DETAILED OUR STRUGGLE OVER THE LAST YEAR TO FIND A SUITABLE SITE AND THIS WAS THE MOST WE COULD FIND IN ST. JOHN'S COUNTY THAT HAD LAND-USE AND REQUIRED TWEAKS AROUND THE EDGES IN ORDER FOR THE ZONING TO ALLOW KE TO BUILD A NEW FACILITY WHERE IT WANTS TO

GO. >> I APPRECIATE THAT AND IT'S A SUITABLE LOCATION FOR THEM. I INTEND TO VOTE ON THIS CERTAINLY GIVEN THE WETLAND IMPACTS AND YOU MIGHT SAY WHERE

YOU MIGHT MITIGATE THEM. >> I COULD SPEAK TO THE TWO.

WE WERE NOT INVOLVED IN THE INITIAL WETLAND PERMITTING PROCESS FTP AND ST. JOHN'S STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, THEY PURCHASE CREDIT WITH THE FISHTAIL MITIGATION BANK THOSE WERE PAID FOR. ONE THING I KNOW I DID SPEND TIME WITH BYRON PEACOCK WHO WAS HER WETLAND ENGINEER AND TO ME, DON'T HOLD IMPERFECTLY TO THIS BUT I KNOW THEY DID A GOOD JOB OF NOT IMPACTING I WOULD CALL THE HIGH-QUALITY WETLANDS THE TREES IN THE SWAMPY CONDITIONS. WE CAN SEE THE WETLANDS.

[00:25:08]

>> MOST OF THOSE WERE FAIRLY LOW QUALITY.

>> THE THIRD MAYBE NOT A QUESTION IT'S MORE OF A STATEMENT OF THE TRAFFIC AND I'M GLAD YOU'RE CONSIDERING A TRAFFIC LIGHT INTO A SEVEN. LAST WEEK I HAD TO DRIVE TO A FUNERAL AT SAINT AMBROSE CHURCH AND THERE WAS TRAFFIC COMING OUT OF THAT ROAD ONTO TO A SEVEN TO GET TO THE INTERSTATE AND THE DISTRIBUTION WILL BE DOING THE SAME BUT I LIKE THE FACT IT'S CLOSE TO I-95, I DEFINITELY LIKE THAT AND COMING BACK A LOT OF TRAFFIC AND SOMEBODY PULLED OUT NEARLY IN FRONT OF US SO I'M HOPING THAT YOU ALL ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE A TRAFFIC LIGHT SPINNAKER PUD DOCUMENTS WERE REQUIRED TO PROVIDED TRAFFIC REPORT OF 30 DAYS OF APPROVAL AND WEIRD HE DID A TRAFFIC REPORT AND WE HAD CONVERSATION WITH F DOT.

MISO WARRANTS FOR A TRAFFIC IT'S GOTTA GET PUT IN NOW ARE WORKING ON INCENTIVE AND HOW THAT'S GOING TO BE HANDLED AND I DON'T DISAGREE WITH YOU AS A DEVELOPER YOU WANT TO SPEND MONEY SMARTLY AND YOU WANT OUR CUSTOMERS TO GET OUT OF THERE, IT WAS A TRAFFIC ISSUE IT'S HARD FOR ME TO DRIVE MY CAR FROM CHICAGO AND VERY AGGRESSIVE AND I SHOULD HAVE TO STAY HERE FOR A MINUTE TO GET OUT OF HERE. IT'S GOING TO GO IN, HOW LONG THAT WILL TAKE A HAVE TO DO AN ANALYSIS AND HOW LONG IT TAKES TO GO TO THE PROCESS. WE GOTTA HAVE THE WAY OUR STRUCTURE IS MY GUESS IT'LL BE INSTALLED, WE HAVE ALMOST TWO

YEARS. >> GREAT ANSWER, I APPRECIATE

THAT. >> HENRY?

>> I GO DOWN THAT ROAD QUITE A BIT IN THE DIFFICULTIES OF GETTING OUT AND IN. I ASSUME THIS IS A DOCK HEIGHT WAREHOUSE. IS YOUR BUILDING MEASURED FROM FINISH FLOOR. I'M JUST CURIOUS THE HEIGHT OF YOUR BUILDING IS IT STREET HEIGHT.

>> AS YOU KNOW EVERY COMMUNITY THAT IS INTIMATELY.

AYE KNOW HOW THE CITY HANDLES IT BUT I'M NOT SURE THE COUNTY THE

HEIGHT MAY NOT BE. >> IT'S WHERE YOU MEASURE IT.

>> I BELIEVE IT'S FINISH FOR. >> NEXT QUESTION FOR ONE OF YOU YOU'RE GOING TO 500 AND SOME SQUARE FEET.

>> COMPUTER BUMPED ME OFF. WHY DO YOU NEED THAT IN THE PUD IS THERE CERTAIN SIZE MAXIMUM BUILDING.

>> I CERTAINLY DO HAVE A PROBLEM I'M JUST CURIOUS WHYTION.

>> A LITTLE HISTORY THIS BEAUTY WAS A 500 SQUARE-FOOT BEAUTY BACK IN THE DAY THEN IT WAS MODIFIED TO BE A LOWER NUMBER OF SQUARE FEET AND LAST YEAR WAS MODIFIED TO BE 501,000.

NOW ARE MODIFYING A MAXIMUM OF 545,000 SQUARE FEET IN ONE

BUILDING JUST FOR KE. >> I DO HOPE TO GET TRAFFIC LIGHTS UP. I'M OUT OF THERE ALL THE TIME.

LIKE YOU SAID THERE WAS A BOND WHEN THEY DID IT TO BE ABLE TO PUT IT IN AT SOME POINT WHEN IT'S NEEDED.

>> IT'S MIXED USE DISTRICT, OBVIOUSLY LAND-USE, ALL THE FIR AND ISR ALL THOSE THINGS HAVE TO COMPLY WITH.

>> , I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THOSE.

>> STAFF. >> THANK YOU MR. CHAIR.

AS FOR THE LAND OF ELEMENT CODE AND THE 12 DEFINITIONS FOR THE HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING THE DISTANCE FROM THE LOWEST POINT OF ESTABLISHED GRADE SURROUNDED THE PERMIT OR TO THE HIGHEST

POINT OF THE ROOF. >> SO IT IS GREAT IS NOT FOR.

>> ESTABLISHED GRADE IT IS NOT DEFINED ALSO.

>> AT THE LOWEST POINT WHICH WOULD BE [INAUDIBLE]'S.

>> IN OUR WORLD THEY WILL BE 4 FEET LOW THE ELEVATION.

IF THAT'S THE INTERPRETATION AND MEANS OF BUILDING IS AT 51 FEET

[00:30:01]

AND IS 51 MINUS 4 FEET AND IS MEASURED FROM THE LOWEST POINT.

>> ALL OTHER EXPERT COME TALK. >> IT WOULD BE GE 10151, BUILDING 200, THERE ARE SURROUNDING GRADES THAT WILL BE CLOSE TO THE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION BOTH OF THE IN CAPS WILL BE PARKING BECAUSE OF THE SENSIBILITY, THE TRUCK COURT IS LOWER WITH ARCHITECTURAL HEIGHT OF THE BUILDING IS FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF SO IT WOULD BE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TO THE TOP WHICH IS 53 FEET.

IT IS 4 FEET LOWER THAN ELEVATION.

THE FOUNDATION STARTS AT THE ELEVATION.

>> LET ME ASK A QUESTION OF STAFF WHEN WE TALK ABOUT GRADE DO WE TALK ABOUT FINISH GRADE OR NATURAL GRADE.

>> IT'S CALLED ESTABLISH GRADE WITH THE E-LOWERCASE-LETTER NG THERE'S NO DEFINITION OF ESTABLISHED GRADE SEWER ENGINEERS GO OUT THERE AND BASED ON WORK WITH THE CONTRACTOR AND WERE THE ESTABLISH GRADE IS AND WHATEVER THAT MEANS.

HOPEFULLY THAT HAS ADMINISTERED TOO MUCH BUT BASICALLY WHATEVER THE SITE CONDITIONS WERE FOR THIS DEVELOPMENT CAME IN IF THAT

MAKES SENSE. >> IS SOMETHING WE HAVE AN ISSUE

HERE. >> PERHAPS WE ARE TO GO BACK WHAT WE PROPOSE THIS THE PUD INCLUDES A BUILDING HEIGHT AND IT JUST SAYS STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PUD MAY BE A MAXIMUM OF 53 FEET IN HEIGHT PERHAPS WE OUGHT TO DEFINE HOW THE HEIGHT IS MEASURED SO WILL BE CLEAR ABOUT HER.

AS DEFINED WILL FIGURE THAT OUT AS STARTING THE MEASUREMENT AT FINISH FLOOR AND MEASURING TO THE TOP OF THE ROOF, HOW ABOUT

THAT. >> WE HAVE THE CODE AND THEN WE HAVE PROPOSAL A MAJOR MODIFICATION PUD'S CAN INSERT THINGS THAT VARY FROM THE CODE. IF IT DOES VARY MAYBE THAT'S A DISCUSSION TO DETERMINE WHETHER OR NOT IT'S A WAIVER FROM THE CODE AND THEN POTENTIALLY IF THE BOARD IS OKAY WITH THAT AND THE AGENCY IS OKAY WITH THAT WE CAN MOVE ON.

WHAT I WILL DO IN THE MEANTIME I'D GOING TO TRY TO GET ONE OF OUR ENGINEERS AND WE WILL TALK BRIEFLY BUT IT DOES APPEAR THE DOGS COUNT WILL CONFIRM THAT AND IF WE CAN FIGURE THAT OUT IN THE AGENCY WOULD HAVE AN OPPOR OPPORTUNITY.

>> WE ARE DEFINITELY RAISING THE PATTERN.

>> IS 5 FEET SPINNAKER PROBABLY IS.

>> THAT'S WHY I RAISE THIS QUESTION I THANK YOU GOING TO BE SHORT I KNOW THE CITY HAS SOME ADJUSTMENT WOULD FLOOD ZONE IN FEMA WHERE THEY MEASURE DEPENDING ON WHICH DISTRICT IN YOUR HEIGHT IT'S BEEN A ISSUE AND WHERE YOUR MEASURING FROM AND WHEN FEMA LAWS CHANGE IN THE CITIES HAD TO ADJUST I AM THINKING LOADING DOCK. AT ONE TIME IT WAS THE CROWN OF THE ROAD FOR THE COUNTY THAT WAS PROBABLY 15 YEARS AGO.

THAT'S WHY I'M ASKING I DON'T WANT YOU TO END UP.

>> THANK YOU FOR RAISING WHAT I WOULD PROPOSE AS YOU ALLOW US TO WORK WITH STAFF WITH DISPARATE UNDERSTANDING I'M GOING TO SAY IN MY LAYMAN'S TERM. WHATEVER THE FILL FOR THE BUILDING FOR THE TRUCK WITH THE TOP OF THE ROOF WOULD BE A

MEASUREMENT OF THE 53 FEET. >> THAT'S NOT QUITE RIGHT.

>> WERE MAING A RECOMMENDATION OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION.

THIS IS A RECOMMENDATION. IT'S UP TO THE AGENCY IF YOU WOULD LIKE US TO WORK IT OUT ON THE WAY WE CAN ADDED ADDITIONAL

[00:35:14]

CONDITION FROM THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT TO THE FINISH FLOOR.

IN MY OPINION WHICH I BELIEVE IS WHAT YOU HAVE DESIGN, IS THAT

CORRECT? >> THAT IS CORRECT WE ARE STILL IN QUESTION DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE A QUESTION AT THIS POINT.

>> DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKER CARDS? WE ARE BACK ON THE AGENCY FOR A

MOTION. >> AND REQUEST.

>> I'M GLAD TO SEE THAT THEY WANT TO STAY HERE I THINK IT'S A GREAT EMPLOYER. I'M GOING TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE AND I PROBABLY NEED LEGAL TO HELP ME MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE 2023 E- ONE DEER PARK COMMERCIAL CENTER BASED UPON SIX FINDINGS AS PROVIDED BY STAFF AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO INCLUDE WHERE YOU READ INTO WHAT I WOULD NEED TO

ADD. >> THE HIGH APPROVE FROM THE FINISHED FLOOR LEVEL INSTEAD OF THE NORMAL COUNTY STANDARD.

>> THAT IS MY MOTION. >> SECOND SPINNAKER SECOND BY

MEGAN. >> A DISCUSSION?

>> I WOULD LIKE TO SAY WHEN THEY FIRST ENTERED OUR VOCABULARY LAST YEAR AT THE ELKTON INDUSTRIAL PARK AND THAT WAS TURNED DOWN, A LOT OF PEOPLE WERE SHOUTING AND SCREAMING WE WANT TO CLOSE IT I 95 AND IT SHOULD BE WITHIN THE DEVELOPING BOUNDARY OF THE COUNTY AND I WAS ONE OF THOSE.

IT IS NOW IN MY OPINION APPROPRIATELY LOCATED AND YOU ARE KEEPING JOBS IN THE COUNTY. THEY ARE GOOD EMPLOYER.

I'M HAPPY TO SEE THEM STAY HERE AND I DEFINITELY INTEND TO VOTE FOR THIS. I THINK IT'S A GOOD ECONOMIC BOOST FOR THE COUNTY AND I'M GLAD THE NONMOVING.

THANK YOU ALL VERY MUCH. >> ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? SEEN UNLESS REGISTER THE VOTE. THAT PASSES FIVE -0.

>> I BUILD WAREHOUSES THAT I BEEN THROUGH THIS, I WAS SITTING

APPEAR. >> THANK YOU FOR THE BRAINSTORMING, YOU PROBABLY SAVED US FROM HAVING TO DO

ANOTHER MAJOR RUN. >> WE DON'T WANT TO FIND OUT

[3. COMPAMD 2023-03 11280 US 1 North Self Storage (Transmittal)]

AFTER WE CEMENT OUR DRAWINGS. >> JIM THANK YOU COMING DOWN FROM CHICAGO, SPEND A LOT OF MONEY WHEN YOU'RE HERE.

>> WE WILL. >> I SPEND A LOT OF MONEY DOWN

>> ARE RIGHT MR. WESTER. >> THANK YOU VERY MUCH BRAD WESTER DRIVER MCAFEE HAWTHORNE AND STEPHEN NOW.

JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA 32202, HE REPRESENTING ITEM NUMBER THREE SELF STORAGE FACILITY. HAVE A PRESENTATION IN A REACHED OUT BY E-MAIL AND PHONE TO THE MEMBERS.

I'LL BEGIN MY PRESENTATION HERE, THIS IS A PROJECT WE ARE DOING A SITE SPECIFIC TEXT AMENDMENT, PLAN TO THIS PROPERTY TO SUFFICE AND FA ARE INCREASED. BETWEEN THE 210 OVERPASS AND THE FLYOVER ON U.S. ONE NORTH. THIS IS A REQUEST TO INCREASE THE FLOOR AREA RATIO AND SITE SPECIFIC COMP PLANS 2.05 ACRES.

THIS IS A LONG THE U.S. ONE HIGHWAY INTENDED TO SERVE THE NEARBY RESIDENTS THIS IS A SELF STORAGE USE AND CURRENTLY ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN ASKING FOR ANY MAP AMENDMENT OF COMPANION OF REZONING IN THE PREVIOUS AGENT MENTIONED WE FOUND A REALLY NICE PIECE OF PROPERTY IN THE MARKET AREA WE NEED SOME

[00:40:09]

TWEAKS AT HAND IT WAS INTENSVE COMMERCIAL.

THE DRI IN A RUN OF PROPERTY 2.05 ACRES, ROUND THAT IS ACCOMMODATION OF THE NEWTOWN THE MIXED-USE AND COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE, THERE ARE SMALL LEFTOVER POCKETS THIS WAS A RURAL CULTURE IN A TRIANGLE AND THIS WAS THE REMAINING THERE AS WELL. HERE IS A CLOSE-UP IMAGE OF THE AERIAL PHOTO OF THE PROPERTY. YOU CAN SEE THE DEVELOPMENT TAKING PLACE AROUND. THIS'LL GO THROUGH THE VARIOUS USES SURROUNDED THE PROPERTY. IMMEDIATELY ABUTTING US TO THE NORTH'S CROSS RIDGE PLAZA CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A TENANT WHICH IS THE DAYCARE PRESCHOOL. THERE IS A NEXT ABUTTING TO THE RESIDENTIAL LOT 0.1 ACRES TOTAL IT'S LEGALLY NONCONFORMING BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MEET THE STANDARDS CURRENTLY.

SURROUNDING CONTINUING OUTDOOR STORAGE OF RV AND VOTE, PRETTY EXPENSIVE FEEDING OFF AND SURROUNDED HER PROPERTY IN THE

OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY TO THE EAST. >> THERE IS A CR TO 10 OVERPASS TALKING ABOUT SIGNIFICANCE OF THAT AND THEN I SEE OVERPASS.

WE CAN HEAR AT TIMES FROM THIS BUILDING.

ROAD BUILDERS IN THE FUTURE COMMERCIAL SITE AND THE KNOCKING TO DEVELOP IT FURTHER IN THE INTENDED FUTURE COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE AND INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH THEY DON'T HAVE AN FA ARE WITH THE PROPERTY THE ONLY LIMITED BY THE LOT COVERAGE BASICALLY.

THIS IS ABOUT THE COMPATIBILITY. THESE ARE PICTURES OF THE AREA I'M SURE YOU DRIVEN BY IT IN OVERPASS AREA AND THE COMMUNICATION TOWER THERE. AND ON THE SOUTH SIDE FRAMING THE DEVELOPING AREA AND THE 210 OVERPASS TO THE SOUTH.

MORE OF A HIGH ELEMENT TO THIS AREA ON U.S. ONE AND A TENANT SIGN HERE THAT IS REALLY OCCUPIED BY THE PRESCHOOL RIGHT NOW IN MANY SPACES READY TO GO FOR FUTURE IN-LINE COMMERCIAL .11 ACRES. YOU CAN SEE THE TRIANGLE PIECE ON THE PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY ABUTTING TO THE NORTH AND YOU CAN SEE ALL KINDS OF WHAT'S USED AS A STORAGE.

THIS IS RV AND VOTE STORAGE THIS AXIS IS AWFULLY U.S. ONE NORTH THIS IS A ONE RIGHT BEHIND US AND ACCESS ON THE PROPERTY OF OLD DIXIE HIGHWAY ABUTTING TO THE WEST IN IMAGES SHOWING THE SUPERSTRUCTURE OF THE FRAMING IN THE STEEL GOING IN RIGHT NOW FOR MORE OF THE RV AND VOTE STORAGE FACILITIES.

THIS IS A CONCEPT PLAN FOR PROPERTY HERE.

THIS TEXT AMENDED WILL BE TIED TO A SPECIFIC USE, OUR REQUEST IS FOR FA ARE INCREASE AND MORE SPECIFICALLY FOR SELF STORAGE ONLY. YOU COULD SEE HER PROPERTY HERE PULLING INTO THE PROPERTY FOR TURNAROUND LOADING AND UNLOADING BASE BACKUP TO U.S. ONE AND THIS IS VERY MUCH IN CONCERT WITH THE ABUTTING PROPERTY TO NORTH COMMERCIAL WILL SHOW THAT IN A MINUTE. ALL OTHER STANDARDS WILL BE MET INCLUDING HEIGHT, PARKING, STORMWATER, SETBACKS EXCEPT FOR FA ARE. THERE ARE NO OTHER WAIVERS OF VARIANCE NEEDED THERE ARE NO FLOODPLAINS, SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN, WE DO HAVE A TREE SURVEILLING PROPERTY BUT IS PRETTY MUCH A BLANK CANVAS READY FOR DEVELOPMENT IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH COMMERCIAL USE ALONG U.S. ONE NORTH IN THE REQUEST FOR CLIMATE CONTROLLED STORAGE ONLY NO OUTDOOR.

THE OUTDOOR STORAGE ALREADY EXIST IN THE AREA.

OUR REQUEST IS 32007 TO 50 SQUARE-FOOT THAT'S BUILT UP OVER

[00:45:03]

THREE FLOORS ONLY THAT'S ONLY 36% TOTAL LINE AREA THIS IS A REQUEST TO LIMITED THREE STORIES BECAUSE WILL MEET THE CODE REQUIREMENT IN COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ZONING LAND USE FOR A TOTAL OF 98002 TO 50000, 250 SQUARE FEET OVER 100,000 WHICH IS GENERALLY THE STANDARD FOR SELF STORAGE CLOSE CLIMATE CONTROL FACILITIES CURRENTLY THE FIR IS 50% AND ISR IS 75% WHICH IS A SERVICE RATIO AND THE MAX STANDARD CURRENT THE FIR TEXT MAMA THAT WERE REQUESTING AT HER PROPERTY SPECIFICALLY ALLOWS THE POLICY TO LIMIT THE USE THAT MAY GENERATE A HIGHER TRAFFIC DEMAND AND OTHER IMPACTS. AS YOU CAN SEE HERE COMMERCIAL INTENSIVE ZONING DOES ALLOW A LIST OF MANY, MANY USES AND THOSE CAN BE VERY INTENSE GROCERY STROKE, DRUGSTORES, ANNABLE HOSPITALS WITH NOISE, HARDWARE HOME IMPROVEMENT, RESTAURANTS, AUTOMOBILE, REPAIR GARAGE, ALL BY RIGHT AND HAVE A MUCH HIGHER TRAFFIC AND PARKING RATIOS ASSOCIATED IN VERY LOW IN TERMS OF THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS OF PARKING AND TRIP GENERATION.

THIS IS OUR TRAFFIC SUMMARY IT SHOWS A TRAFFIC CIRCULATION LINKS FOR THE COUNTY CODE AND WE ARE ON 126 U.S. HIGHWAY ONE BETWEEN VALLEY RIDGE CURRENTLY NOT EFFICIENT OPERATING AT LEVELS THE SELF STORAGE IS EXEMPT FROM CAN ENTER CONCURRENCY ADOPTED ORDINANCE 2018.

THIS IS ANOTHER CONCEPT OF THE SITE PLAN AND MINUTE SHOW AN FA OR COMPARISON IF WE WERE TO DEVELOP THE FLOOR AREA RATIO AS IT SUITS TODAY FOR THE SELF STORAGE FACILITY THIS IS WHAT IT WOULD BE 14000 SQUARE-FOOT ROUGHLY FLOOR PLAYING OVER THE CODE REQUIREMENTS. YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE PROPERTY IS ORIENTED ON U.S. ONE IS THE PROPERTY LONGER TINGLE IF YOU WILL AND PUT THIS UP TO THE FRONT IT REALLY HAS THE SAME HEIGHT AND MASS PERSPECTIVE ALONG U.S. ONE AS A CURRENT FAR STORAGE FACILITY. IN THE ORIENTATION IMPACT OF THE LAYOUT SPECIFICALLY, KEEP IN MIND THIS IS GOOD BE LIMITED TO THIS PROPERTY AND LIMITED TO THE USE AND ALSO THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THE LIMITATION ON THE FLOOR AREA RATIO BUT TO ADD A TOTAL OF WHAT YOU SEE 14883 COMPARED TO 32750 PER FLOOR, THE RED IS A MAXIMUM OF WHAT IT WOULD BE IN THE YELLOW IS A TOTAL REQUEST OF WHAT WERE ASKING FOR THREE WE MEET EVERY OTHER CODE PROVISION, HERE IS THE PROPERTY AND THIS IS HER SLSITE PLAN LATE INTO THE PROPEY YOU CAN SEE HOW CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY, THEY HAVE A VERY SIMILAR AND THEY HAVE A CUL-DE-SAC IMPEDING BACKUP VERY SIMILAR COMPATIBLE YOU CAN SEE THE DIRT CLEARED AND OTHER IMAGES OF THE PROPERTIES GOING UP FOR THE OUTDOOR, THAT IS SEPARATED FROM ANY RESIDENTIAL USES UP ONTO NEARBY THEIR PROPERTY HAS AN EXPANSION READY, YOU CAN SEE THE PAD IS READY SO THEY CAN INCREASE UP TO THE MAXIMUM THRESHOLD IF NEEDED. OURS WILL BE BUILT ON ONE SINGLE PHASE WITH A STORAGE FACILITY WE WOULD NEED ROUGHLY A YEAR OF FULL DESIGN AND PERMITTING THEM TO PUT A SHOVEL IN THE GROUND.

IF APPROVED WE WILL BE LOOKING AT THE FALL OF 24 BREAKING GROUND UNDERWENT SINGLE PHASE. HERE ARE RENDERINGS OF THE PROJECT WE HAVE A LIVE WALL PLAN WHICH YOU COULD SEE THE ARCHITECTURAL LEADING OF THIS IN A BEGINNING CONTROLLED.

HE CAN SEE THE DIFFERENT ELEMENTS THIS IS THE LOADING DOCK AND FEEDING BACK IN HERE IS WHERE THE CUL-DE-SAC WOULD BE TO TURN AROUND AND COME BACK UP. SELF STORAGE IS LOW INTENSITY USE EXPENSIVE PARKING AREAS IS NOT WARRANTED, SURELY ENFORCING EMPLOYER RATIO WITH NO OTHER WAVIER OR VARIANCES IT IMPOSES A HARDSHIP AND REGULAR SIZE AND SHAPE IS ONLY 2.05 ACRES, IN ORDER TO GET A SELF STORAGE FACILITY WE HAVE TO GET DOUBLE THE AMOUNT OF PROPERTY TO THE MITIGATING ELEMENTS OF THE FIR REQUEST, LESS LAND IS NEEDED THUS IMPERVIOUS LOT COVERAGE SIMILAR MASS IN PERSPECTIVE INCOMPATIBLE WITH AREA AND HAS

[00:50:06]

MUCH LESS TRAFFIC GENERATOR. WE THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND ASK FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL THIS IS A TRANSMITTAL

HEARING BY THE WAY. >> ANY QUESTIONS OF APPLICANT.

>> AREAS. I WAS WONDERING THIS IS MORE OF A QUESTION FOR STAFF BY A SIX MONTH AGO WE HAD AN FAR INCREASE REQUEST FROM DOUG BARNETT INDOOR SELF STORAGE ON 207 AND THEY WERE ASKING FOR A FLORIDA AREA RATIO FROM 70 - 120 AND THIS IS 50 - 110 IS THERE A REASON THAT WAS 7 TO BEGIN WITH BECAUSE IT WAS A MIXED-USE DISTRICT OR WHY IS THIS 50 AND I WAS 70? AND I MADE THE STATEMENT AT THE TIME I THOUGHT WE'RE GOING TO SEE A LOT MORE COMMUNION AND WE APPROVE THAT BUT MY SECOND QUESTION FOR STAFF HOW MANY OF THE FLORIDA AREA RATIO PROJECTS HAS PLANNING AND ZONING APPROVED OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS.

>> MR. CHAIR JUST THE ONE THAT YOU MENTION ALONG STATE ROAD 207 THAT IS THE FIRST ONE THAT WE KNOW OF HER REQUEST TO MAKE THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING THAT SO I DON'T MAKE A BLENDER IN THE FUTURE LIKE IT DID THE LAST MEETING.

I WOULD RATHER SEE SOME BUILDING UP AND HAVING LESS IMPACT THE MORE IMPERVIOUS. CAN YOU PLEASE REFRESH YOUR MEMORY WE WILL BE BETWEEN 35 AND 40 FEET WERE NOT ASKING FOR A VARIANCE YOU CAN GO OVER IN THE INTENSIVE DISTRICT IF YOU COME IN OFF THE PROPERTY LINE MORE BUT WERE NOT SEEKING THAT AND LIMITATION FOR THE THREE-STORY BUILDING.

THE OTHER ONE IN THE AREA ARE FOUR STORIES AND I THINK THE ONE MR. BURNETT HE HAD A LONG LINEAR FRONTAGE YOU CAN SEE THE MASSIVE OF THE BUILDING THIS ONE HAS A LONGER LINEAR FROM U.S. ONE AND IT WOULD BE THE SAME BUT WE WILL MEET THE 40-FOOT FOR STRUCTURE.

>> I APPRECIATE THAT, MR. BURNETT'S PROJECT DEVIL ASKED FOR HIGH INCREASE AND IS GOING TO BE WAY TALLER AND

ACROSS THE STREET. >> THE OVERPASSES THEY PROVIDE HEIGHT IN THEIR BACK STOP FOR THAT LINEAR AREA.

>> I THINK TRAFFIC FLOWS GOOD AND LOCATION IS FINE.

>> WE REACHED OUT TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE SCHOOL AND THEY WERE FINE WITH IT WE REACHED OUT TO THE TRANQUIL PROPERTY OWNER AND COULD NOT GET IT DONE WITH THEM BUT THEY HAVE

BEEN LEGALLY NOTICED AS WELL. >> READ AN ITEM A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO. IT WAS NOT AN INDOOR SELF STORAGE UNIT THAT WAS RIGHT NEXT TO AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AFTER HEADS WEST AND 16 A AND GOES NORTHWEST AND 16 GOES WEST AND THERE WAS A LOT OF NEIGHBORS CONCERNED ABOUT PEOPLE SITTING IN RVS BUT THERE MIGHT BE PEEPING TOMS AND CHILDREN AND THAT WAS A CONCERN EXPRESSED BY RESIDENTS SINCE IT IS A PRESCHOOL NEXT TO YOU WHAT YOU HAVE ENHANCED SCREENING OR OFFER

ON YOUR NORTH SIDE? >> CURRENTLY IT'S ONE TENET AND THEY CLEARLY HAVE THE SIGNAGE THERE INDICATING FUTURE TENANTS

[00:55:03]

HAVE THE ABILITY TO GO THERE, WITH THAT SAID THE LONG-TERM NATURE WE WILL MEET THE CODE WITH REGARD TO THE NATURE OF THE ABUTTING PROPERTIES IN THE SCREENING THAT IS INVOLVED WE HAVE THE RIGHT SETBACK NOR ARE WE ASKING FOR A WAIVER OF THE LANDSCAPING AND BUFFERING AND SCREENING REQUIREMENTS AND RIGHT NOW WILL MEET THE CODE ACQUIRE TO THAT.

RIGHT NOW HAVE A PARKING LOT SEPARATING OUR BUILDING IN ADDITION TO THE SETBACK TO THEIR STRUCTURE SO THERE IS SEPARATION BUILT IN FOR THAT AND THERE SHOULD BE NOBODY LOOKING INTO A COMMERCIAL CENTER BECAUSE IS NOT OCCUPIED IN OUR UNIT AND LEAVE.

>> THANK YOU. >> YOU'RE WELCOME.

>> DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT.

>> SPEAKER KURT. >> WERE BACK INTO THE AGENCY.

>> THE MOTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL TRANSMITTAL 031-1280 U.S. ONE SELF STORAGE BASED UPON THE FINDING PROVIDED IN THIS

MATTER. >> A MOTION BY

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.